Air India Express B738 crash
Brilliant post,Highcirrus -you are quite correct in saying that a little humility is important and goes a long way.Not always apparent,unfortunately.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The only common factor appears to be poor command by the Captains concerned.
Today we tend to fly as crews. There was a discussion here of PF and PNF botched coordination and disagreement on a go around decision and Flyingphil cited the CI TPE crash as an example of how not to do it. I replied with a mention of the eerily similar CI NGO crash. My apologies if we were out of line.
Caveats, Flyingphil is not a pilot and I drive the lav truck so we always appreciate your superior views here.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I drive the lav truck
To repeat: Flyingphil's 'accident' does not state who flew the g/a
Your first shows a botched HANDLING during an INADVERTENT g/a , not a 'decison'.
Your second doesn't even mention a g/a
Mangalore = no go-round. Compute.
With my inferior knowledge of how you fly today as crew, it looks very much like all the Captains involved in those accidents failed to exercise command of a crew (of more than one)?
Edit: Thanks Aditya
Last edited by BOAC; 9th Jun 2010 at 07:31.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry Guys, I copied the wrong link.
Read about this incident in a book years ago in which several CVR-Recordings were listed. This book contains several incidents/accidents of A300s in Asia unfortunately.
This one here is the correct one:
ASN Aircraft accident Airbus A300B4-622R HL7296 Cheju Airport (CJU)
And here with the detail of "disagreements" between the flight-crew whether to abandon or execute the landing.
Accident Database: Accident Synopsis 08101994
Concerning to the book mentioned the Captain was a US- or Canadian Expat and PF on the leg and gave the "Contine Landing"-Command when suddenly the F/O initiated a GA.
This lead (as mentioned in the links) to a delayed Touch-Down with subsequent overran of the RWY.
May I ask again if anybody who works or has worked for a Pilot-Agency to share his/her experiences of Training before joining an operator?!?!
I knew some pilots of my company who worked elsewhere before and had to get used to our procedures although they joined us as DEC.
Some of them were retired guys from our national major airline with over 20K in the log.
In addition I watched several Justplanes-DVD's in the past and came across a bunch of different tasks and procedures with the same acfts e.g. A320
Would be interesting to know how this potential for critical mistakes (Which might also be applicapable here) is handled!
Read about this incident in a book years ago in which several CVR-Recordings were listed. This book contains several incidents/accidents of A300s in Asia unfortunately.
This one here is the correct one:
ASN Aircraft accident Airbus A300B4-622R HL7296 Cheju Airport (CJU)
And here with the detail of "disagreements" between the flight-crew whether to abandon or execute the landing.
Accident Database: Accident Synopsis 08101994
Concerning to the book mentioned the Captain was a US- or Canadian Expat and PF on the leg and gave the "Contine Landing"-Command when suddenly the F/O initiated a GA.
This lead (as mentioned in the links) to a delayed Touch-Down with subsequent overran of the RWY.
May I ask again if anybody who works or has worked for a Pilot-Agency to share his/her experiences of Training before joining an operator?!?!
I knew some pilots of my company who worked elsewhere before and had to get used to our procedures although they joined us as DEC.
Some of them were retired guys from our national major airline with over 20K in the log.
In addition I watched several Justplanes-DVD's in the past and came across a bunch of different tasks and procedures with the same acfts e.g. A320
Would be interesting to know how this potential for critical mistakes (Which might also be applicapable here) is handled!
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Sorry Guys, I copied the wrong link.
Read about this incident in a book years ago in which several CVR-Recordings were listed. This book contains several incidents/accidents of A300s in Asia unfortunately.
Read about this incident in a book years ago in which several CVR-Recordings were listed. This book contains several incidents/accidents of A300s in Asia unfortunately.
Concerning to the book mentioned the Captain was a US- or Canadian Expat and PF on the leg and gave the "Contine Landing"-Command when suddenly the F/O initiated a GA.
This lead (as mentioned in the links) to a delayed Touch-Down with subsequent overran of the RWY.
This lead (as mentioned in the links) to a delayed Touch-Down with subsequent overran of the RWY.
It is a classic case of how not to do it. They probably had room to either land long and stop or go around but not do both halfway. I too thought of this crash when details began to emerge on the AIX mishap: expat and local crew, reported dispute over landing or go around and reports of a late touchdown.
Interesting point on the options as FO to call for go around (waveoff in some circles) by either pushing power forward, or raising gear.
My first instinct would be that the better choice is add power. Power and attitude are the first two determinants of performance, tough configuration is a non trivial third.
Seems to me that raising the gear merely adds the chance of a gear up landing to an already f&!@$#d up situation.
I may be biased by the number of times I yelled "power" and slammed the throttles forward (yes, attitude to climb chosen) to initiate a waveoff when a student pilot got us too slow, or too something, a bit too close to the ground. Power gives you options via energy.
What was instructive was to see other ways of looking at it. Many different ways to peel the onion.
My first instinct would be that the better choice is add power. Power and attitude are the first two determinants of performance, tough configuration is a non trivial third.
Seems to me that raising the gear merely adds the chance of a gear up landing to an already f&!@$#d up situation.
I may be biased by the number of times I yelled "power" and slammed the throttles forward (yes, attitude to climb chosen) to initiate a waveoff when a student pilot got us too slow, or too something, a bit too close to the ground. Power gives you options via energy.
What was instructive was to see other ways of looking at it. Many different ways to peel the onion.
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Canada
Age: 82
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On this one, the captain BW was a 'North American' (i.e. a Canadian, not an American or a Mexican ). I believe he came from Wardair and had to flee the country on short notice to avoid possible charges as an expat commander involved in an accident. I think he may be retired from Air Canada by now.
"This is old news but it's worth mentioning. I just found out today that the captain of the ill-fated KE A300, died of cancer a few months ago. He was a CDN 767 F/O before his death. RIP"
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
This is a quote from an archived post on PPRuNe - sent on 23 Feb 2001
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Grounded
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Centaurus
How does the F/O fix the problem, exactly? his support calls went unheeded. It is usually obvious by 200 ft agl that the aircraft is going to finish in the over-run if high and fast on a short wet runway - or in the under-run if undershooting. So what happens if the F/O says calmly "Captain - I have control and we are going around Sir".
I'm just a PAX so may be talking rubbish
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: mumbai
Age: 46
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks a lot IFLYtb20
Hi!,
Thank you for pointing this out IFLYtb20. I cant believe that a newspaper would use posts without so much as an acknowledgement.
I guess professionalism is not their strong suit.
Just wondering if the administrator has any comments on the issue (on pprune policy)?
Cheers
Wispering Willows
Thank you for pointing this out IFLYtb20. I cant believe that a newspaper would use posts without so much as an acknowledgement.
I guess professionalism is not their strong suit.
Just wondering if the administrator has any comments on the issue (on pprune policy)?
Cheers
Wispering Willows
Join Date: May 2002
Location: dubai
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All very well bashing up on foreign pilots, down there in India..
Clearly the handling pilot got it "wrong".
What if the PIC was incapacitated, through fatigue or some other reason? Is it not the f/o's job and indeed duty, to take over if he thinks there will be a crash?? It doesn't matter how inexperienced or experienced the other pilot is, that is his most important duty. If necessary get the axe out! From the CVR transcript, he was of that opinion, or he would not have suggested a go around.
Have we not moved on from, 1976, Tenerife?
When I interview a prospective f/o a question I throw in is this. "If I was carrying out an approach and you thought we were going to crash, what would be your actions??"
Clearly the handling pilot got it "wrong".
What if the PIC was incapacitated, through fatigue or some other reason? Is it not the f/o's job and indeed duty, to take over if he thinks there will be a crash?? It doesn't matter how inexperienced or experienced the other pilot is, that is his most important duty. If necessary get the axe out! From the CVR transcript, he was of that opinion, or he would not have suggested a go around.
Have we not moved on from, 1976, Tenerife?
When I interview a prospective f/o a question I throw in is this. "If I was carrying out an approach and you thought we were going to crash, what would be your actions??"
Last edited by doubleu-anker; 13th Jun 2010 at 19:12.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: mumbai
Age: 46
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you
Thank you for your comment.... I was also hoping to ignite a rational debat on the casues of the crash. But that dosne't seem to have happened.
Cheers
Wispering Willows
Cheers
Wispering Willows
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: France
Age: 79
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Captain Oveur ?
Centaur,
Perhaps only an eye-brow raising title for those who don't admit to having watched the Airplane movie...ROFL.. Roger, Oveur and Out..inflating autopilot now, getting hat and coat.
DaveD
Perhaps only an eye-brow raising title for those who don't admit to having watched the Airplane movie...ROFL.. Roger, Oveur and Out..inflating autopilot now, getting hat and coat.
DaveD
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: other side of the world
Age: 58
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interestingly, after the first few pages of this thread there is no more mention of the crew duty cycle, which seems to be at the end of a sleepless night.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On a Wing!
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
End of a tiring duty cycle and a very hard Qtr in the peak of a circadian low...
It gets one thinking. I've personally found myself nearly nodding off during the approach phase of an usually tiring 9 hour / 2 landing duty cycle doing PM for the F/O. This is an effort just to keep awake...
What happens if you have a complicated decision to make towards the fag end of that duty cycle...
It bothers me...and thus came FRMS.
It gets one thinking. I've personally found myself nearly nodding off during the approach phase of an usually tiring 9 hour / 2 landing duty cycle doing PM for the F/O. This is an effort just to keep awake...
What happens if you have a complicated decision to make towards the fag end of that duty cycle...
It bothers me...and thus came FRMS.
Last edited by King on a Wing; 20th Jun 2010 at 17:39.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OMAA
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WSJ article Pilot Error Seen as Likely Cause of Air India Mangalore Crash - WSJ.com
Any steps resulting in improved safety is . Safety comes before comfort and facilities. SAFETY FIRST.
While it's still early for conclusions, some formal findings could be announced shortly. A spokesmen for India's civil aviation ministry said Friday that "the probe will be completed [by the] end of this month and [a] report will be out July 1." On Friday, a spokesman for Air India, the national carrier, said it "will announce some new plans" next month, but declined to elaborate.
Prompted partly by the crash, DGCA officials are scrambling to demonstrate a tougher approach. They are considering imposing or reiterating rules that for many years have been mainstays of global aviation safety.
Prompted partly by the crash, DGCA officials are scrambling to demonstrate a tougher approach. They are considering imposing or reiterating rules that for many years have been mainstays of global aviation safety.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Currently unemployed and live in my parents basement
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes!!!! they have increased safety tenfold..require all expats an air force medical Must be able to do 100 pushups in under a minute, 30 Chinups in under a minute and run 3200 meters under 11 minutes.