Ash clouds threaten air traffic
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bury
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not good 
Statement on Icelandic volcanic eruption: Monday April 19, 2145
Since our last statement at 1530 today, the volcano eruption in Iceland has strengthened and a new ash cloud is spreading south and east towards the UK. This demonstrates the dynamic and rapidly changing conditions in which we are working.
Latest information from the Met Office shows that the situation is worsening in some areas. Based on this information, the situation for Northern Irish airports for the morning is uncertain, due to the new ash cloud. The latest information shows that Scottish airports should be available from 0700 and more airspace over England may become available from 1300 although not as far south as the main London airports.
We will continue to monitor Met Office information and the situation is likely to change overnight. We will make a further statement at approximately 0300 (local time), tomorrow, Tuesday 20 April and again at 0700.
Statement on Icelandic volcanic eruption: Monday April 19, 2145
Since our last statement at 1530 today, the volcano eruption in Iceland has strengthened and a new ash cloud is spreading south and east towards the UK. This demonstrates the dynamic and rapidly changing conditions in which we are working.
Latest information from the Met Office shows that the situation is worsening in some areas. Based on this information, the situation for Northern Irish airports for the morning is uncertain, due to the new ash cloud. The latest information shows that Scottish airports should be available from 0700 and more airspace over England may become available from 1300 although not as far south as the main London airports.
We will continue to monitor Met Office information and the situation is likely to change overnight. We will make a further statement at approximately 0300 (local time), tomorrow, Tuesday 20 April and again at 0700.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Age: 68
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
R44
There were a dozen or so operations cancelled for CYYT last evening and early this morning after the suggestions from the UK met office of that area being affected by ash. Those concerns it appears haven't been echoed, or at least considerably downplayed by the Canadian met folks. Media reports indicate that the folks on this side of the pond tasked with watching that kind of event are saying currently nothing closer than 1,000 kms east of CYYT Operations are back up and running and currently only being affected by the usual fog etc.
There were a dozen or so operations cancelled for CYYT last evening and early this morning after the suggestions from the UK met office of that area being affected by ash. Those concerns it appears haven't been echoed, or at least considerably downplayed by the Canadian met folks. Media reports indicate that the folks on this side of the pond tasked with watching that kind of event are saying currently nothing closer than 1,000 kms east of CYYT Operations are back up and running and currently only being affected by the usual fog etc.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my head
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not an easy decision for someone or some committee I guess ... plenty of data to look at, but as Dream Buster may have been implying with tongue in cheek about Cranfield's sense of urgency, with the world in these parts at a standstill, what we get tomorrow may not be a very scientific decision, well not as we usually expect it in aviation, Jim 
I'm with WhipperSnapper.
I'm with WhipperSnapper.
I have no doubt that companies will hide behind the authority and responsibility of the commanders
Regarding Lufthansa VFR flights, Deutsche Flugsicherung spokesperson stated that PiCs have full responsibility for safe conduct of flight. DLH spokesperson agreed, adding that all safety regulations are being obeyed.
Didn't know Luftie is allowed to fly VFR with pax onboard.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bury
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NATS at 10.00....
Latest information from the Met Office shows that the situation is worsening in some areas. Based on this information, the situation for Northern Irish airports for the morning is uncertain, due to the new ash cloud. The latest information shows that Scottish airports should be available from 0700 and more airspace over England may become available from 1300 although not as far south as the main London airports.
Will BA try and get something in the air ?
Latest information from the Met Office shows that the situation is worsening in some areas. Based on this information, the situation for Northern Irish airports for the morning is uncertain, due to the new ash cloud. The latest information shows that Scottish airports should be available from 0700 and more airspace over England may become available from 1300 although not as far south as the main London airports.
Will BA try and get something in the air ?
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Samsonite
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hope the planned resumption of flying is due to the reported change in eruption emissions, but I do worry it's more to do with economics.
Public opinion is turning against this thing rapidly.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
604guy
Thanks mate, suppose to be flying from Manchester to Calgary tomorrow, not holding my breath though... I'm not a plank driver so can't really give much opinion to the high altitude ops but I dont or wont feel 100% comfortable if we do go....
Thanks mate, suppose to be flying from Manchester to Calgary tomorrow, not holding my breath though... I'm not a plank driver so can't really give much opinion to the high altitude ops but I dont or wont feel 100% comfortable if we do go....
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The middle ground.
Apart from my brief foray into this forum for some humour (from which I quickly retreated as the mods weren't to keen), I have just been reading for a few days, hoping for a let up so that I can sort out the various positions of some family around the globe. (staff travel).
As I said before, I fly, I studied Geology at University, however I would not put myself in a position to say I am qualified to discern whether it is safe to fly.
As a passenger I have flown in proximity to erupting volcanoes. The visible plume was obviously avoided and despite the effect of the size of the plume I am sure we were avoiding at quite some distance.
I am aware the the damage a turbine could be subjected to if ingesting x amount of ash.
Nobody really knows what x is equal to though. Not a volcanologist, not a pilot, certainly not Nats, Eurocontrol nor the Met office, nor, I hazard a guess, the blokes who designed the Engine (apart from the carte blanche and slightly vague referrence about known ash clouds).
Since the initial days of the eruption even those lovely satellite images became fairly useless at detecting the presence of ash in the atmosphere, and so, the boffins relied on mathematical projections of where the ash should be.
Basically what I am getting at is we didn't know a whole bloody lot.
I am not usually astounded by PPRuNE contributors capacity for jumping down somebody's throat, but I am often astounded by sheer bloody arrogance. People on both sides of the line have been assuming a whole damn lot. That flying through UK airspace would have resulted in engine flame outs, or such significant damage as to warrant the engine being decommissioned. That there was absolutely no danger at all and the conservatives have paid Nats to do the incumbent some damage (or some such conspiracy).
The truth lies somewhere in between, and what has really bothered me throughout the whole thing, apart from not being able to pronounce the name of the Volcano, is how little seems to have been done to assess the situation until the Airlines turned around and said 'look this can't continue or we'll not exist next week'.
Anybody who argues their motives are wholly from a financial point of you are being naive. God knows they cannot afford to lose as much as they have done, but remaining grounded for a week would have a far smaller financial impact than losing all of your customers as your planes start calling Mayday all over the world.
I think the initial reaction to close the airspace was probably warranted given how little we knew, but the laissez faire approach that seems to have been taken to getting some hard evidence as to what measures were actually necessary long term is bizarre. And a couple of F18's from Finland and a Dornier somewhere over Grimsby don't cut it for me. Nor does mathematical modelling or guess work.
My two peneth and nothing more, feel free to rip it apart if you like.
As I said before, I fly, I studied Geology at University, however I would not put myself in a position to say I am qualified to discern whether it is safe to fly.
As a passenger I have flown in proximity to erupting volcanoes. The visible plume was obviously avoided and despite the effect of the size of the plume I am sure we were avoiding at quite some distance.
I am aware the the damage a turbine could be subjected to if ingesting x amount of ash.
Nobody really knows what x is equal to though. Not a volcanologist, not a pilot, certainly not Nats, Eurocontrol nor the Met office, nor, I hazard a guess, the blokes who designed the Engine (apart from the carte blanche and slightly vague referrence about known ash clouds).
Since the initial days of the eruption even those lovely satellite images became fairly useless at detecting the presence of ash in the atmosphere, and so, the boffins relied on mathematical projections of where the ash should be.
Basically what I am getting at is we didn't know a whole bloody lot.
I am not usually astounded by PPRuNE contributors capacity for jumping down somebody's throat, but I am often astounded by sheer bloody arrogance. People on both sides of the line have been assuming a whole damn lot. That flying through UK airspace would have resulted in engine flame outs, or such significant damage as to warrant the engine being decommissioned. That there was absolutely no danger at all and the conservatives have paid Nats to do the incumbent some damage (or some such conspiracy).
The truth lies somewhere in between, and what has really bothered me throughout the whole thing, apart from not being able to pronounce the name of the Volcano, is how little seems to have been done to assess the situation until the Airlines turned around and said 'look this can't continue or we'll not exist next week'.
Anybody who argues their motives are wholly from a financial point of you are being naive. God knows they cannot afford to lose as much as they have done, but remaining grounded for a week would have a far smaller financial impact than losing all of your customers as your planes start calling Mayday all over the world.
I think the initial reaction to close the airspace was probably warranted given how little we knew, but the laissez faire approach that seems to have been taken to getting some hard evidence as to what measures were actually necessary long term is bizarre. And a couple of F18's from Finland and a Dornier somewhere over Grimsby don't cut it for me. Nor does mathematical modelling or guess work.
My two peneth and nothing more, feel free to rip it apart if you like.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bavaria
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Statement on Icelandic volcanic eruption: Monday April 19, 2145
Since our last statement at 1530 today, the volcano eruption in Iceland has strengthened and a new ash cloud is spreading south and east towards the UK.
Since our last statement at 1530 today, the volcano eruption in Iceland has strengthened and a new ash cloud is spreading south and east towards the UK.
Gosh darn it, nature can be bloody inconvinient.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Londonium
Age: 49
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well the met office are quite rightly just telling it how it is, and quite rightly washing their hands of commercial decisions.
The very fact that the airspace was meant to open quite nicely at 0600, 1200, 1800 in a linear fashion implies to me that someone has been leaned on.
From the met site, the ash is hanging over us in precisely the same as for the past week.
I was thinking earlier, why doesn't willie walsh conduct a one man flight marathon in a 747 over the north sea? He could even thrash the engines to the max cruise for prolonged periods....
At least it isn't the case, per the Protect and Survive videos, that fallout is deadly dangerous ( on the ground at least)
The very fact that the airspace was meant to open quite nicely at 0600, 1200, 1800 in a linear fashion implies to me that someone has been leaned on.
From the met site, the ash is hanging over us in precisely the same as for the past week.
I was thinking earlier, why doesn't willie walsh conduct a one man flight marathon in a 747 over the north sea? He could even thrash the engines to the max cruise for prolonged periods....
At least it isn't the case, per the Protect and Survive videos, that fallout is deadly dangerous ( on the ground at least)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For what its worth.....speaking as a many years experienced aircraft engineer with a fair bit of boroscope experience......I have seen engines damaged by volcanic ash...some minor damage, the engine still worked, produced power etc but had suffered damage that required it to be removed for overhaul. the problem is the ash cant be seen easily unless its a dense cloud. (Like the Eric Moody experience..although at night they didn't see it) For the airlines to take the risk of damaging the engines...its a big risk. I fully agree its moving towards the 'calculated risk' scenario now. BA conducted a flight over UK/Wales etc, there was reportedly no evidence at all of any ash deposits/damage etc. Engine boroscopes were done before and after the flight with no damage....does this prove anything? depends on exactly where they flew compared to the Met/Nats reported ash areas. If the airlines repeatedly flew through these areas then the damaged may be caused. if they are willing to accept the possible damage and overhaul costs of the engines then Ok....from my own personal experience, it comes down to a financial decision. They can 'safely' fly however, the engines would have to be inspected (boroscoped) almost every day or two (depending on the type/ammount of flights) and the airlines take the risk of the overhaul cost. (I'm willing to do the overtime!!!)...potentially the risk/cost of damage will exceed the cost of operating. (Removing engines takes time, as well as the potential lack of spares in the near future...) I would be happy to take a flight in the current situation if I know the airline is tsking all the steps to monitor the engines etc properly......
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sky news reporting the statement from "National Air Transport Traffic service" 
now, yet still also reporting that Midlands airports will be opening at 1300 and London airports at 1800!
They need to stop reading PPRuNe - No idea where they got that from.
now, yet still also reporting that Midlands airports will be opening at 1300 and London airports at 1800!They need to stop reading PPRuNe - No idea where they got that from.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: depends
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Matt101
Hear, Hear, Exactly the opinion I tried to get out there
We have made snap decisions to start, we had little choice. Now don't whine about who is to blame and who should pay. Let's learn from it and enable ourselves to cope with it from this point onward.
00nix
(an aerospace engineer working in ATM)
Hear, Hear, Exactly the opinion I tried to get out there
We have made snap decisions to start, we had little choice. Now don't whine about who is to blame and who should pay. Let's learn from it and enable ourselves to cope with it from this point onward.
00nix
(an aerospace engineer working in ATM)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: On a foreign shore trying a new wine diet. So far, I've lost 3days!
Age: 75
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone have any news what the Canadians are doing about their visit from the ash yet?
http://http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2010/04/19/nl-flights-resume-419.html?ref=rss&loomia_si=t0:a16:g12:r1:c0.46815:b33053428
On the beach
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Read your airframe or engine manufacturer's guidance
We spend time researching and typing this guidance to avoid our aircraft owners and pilots getting into trouble. Goodnight.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: scotland
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm with matt101 on this, also as a scientist, I think the industry is missing the best chance it may get for a while in collecting as much data as possible by running 'propper test flights' under scientificly designed sets flight variables, in order to make the predictions of what the safe flying ppm levels are and also what other steps should be made to increase safety for flights in ash clouds.
