Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

United pilot arrested at LHR

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

United pilot arrested at LHR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2009, 20:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 53
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
United pilot arrested at LHR

BBC NEWS | UK | England | London | 'Drunk' pilot is held at Heathrow

Oh dear - not again... Will this prove to be a fair cop, or another unjustified over-reaction?

iwalkedaway
iwalkedaway is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 20:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: England
Age: 35
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Number 1 on BBC news already

'Alledgedly.'

There's your key word.
TheOptimist is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 21:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Valley Where the Thames Runs Softly
Age: 77
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just for the record, for those who have missed the many previous threads on this subject, the pilot concerned will have been bailed to return to the police station because the standard Intoximeter is not accurate down to the very low limit for a pilot, being designed to deal with drivers whose limit is four times higher. Hence a doctor will have taken a blood sample which will have to be sent away for analysis.
Unwell_Raptor is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 21:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hazel Grove, Stockport
Age: 83
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Before people go ranting off at security staff, it has been reported this time by UA's own staff according to a BAA spokesman.
lakerman is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 21:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: U.K.
Age: 68
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Analysis for what?

Unwell raptor,

Analysis for what, exactly?

DB
Dream Buster is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 21:38
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 53
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The 'allegedly' was my word when I first posted this item - NOT the BBC's.

iwalkedaway
iwalkedaway is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 21:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Valley Where the Thames Runs Softly
Age: 77
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DB:
Analysis of the level of alcohol in the blood. This is slightly more accurate than the usual breath test. I believe that the limit for those carrying out an aviation function is 20mg of alcohol per 100 ml of blood, as opposed to the driving limit of 80mg per 100ml (which equates to 35 microgrammes of alcohol per 100ml of breath as far as the law is concerned).
The arrested person has a right to take some of the blood with him to arrange his own analysis if he so wishes.
Unwell_Raptor is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 22:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The pilot has now been charged, he has been bailed to appear at Uxbridge Magistrates' Court on 20 November.
shiftkeying is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 22:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The last UAL guy at LHR did OK in crown court after producing character witnesses, maybe this one will also walk with a suspended sentence on the criminal charges:

Heathrow pilot was caught drunk at 9am about to fly to America | Mail Online

I'm not sure the FAA will be so understanding given recent events but, who knows?
Airbubba is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 23:29
  #10 (permalink)  
Jox
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: LHR ( EGLL )
Age: 57
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I accept that this is rumours and news.

Shiftkeying has made an intelligent post; Court case at Uxbridge Magistrates on the 20th. Case is unlikely to be dealt with there and will most probably be referred to the Crown Court to be heard at a date and time to be determined in the future.

Arrested - Innocent

Charged - Innocent

On bail - Innocent

Convicted - Guilty!

Speculation - Unhelpful and destroys reputations & families.

Please can we wait for all self righteous assassinations and speculations until our colleague has been dealt with by the appropriate authority in accordance with the law. That is his right, until such time that a case has been proved.

We have all seen pages on similar incidents only to find out that in the end that something untoward, unexplained or subsequently proved has resulted in no conviction in accordance with the law.

I urge you all, keep your powder dry until an outcome is apparent. If he is acquitted, no problem then, if he is found guilty then you are welcome to your opinions, until then .

Jox
Jox is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 02:24
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I see that CNN actually named the pilot ... for what purpose I don't really understand.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 03:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't a pint of shandy, or a half of Watneys, threaten to put you over that limit? Is it the same with GA in the U.K. I'm wondering?
SDFlyer is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 06:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If indeed he was intoxicated enough for a UA ground staff to notice, then the copilot needs the sack.
Fatfish is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 06:51
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DORSET
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, "drunk" is a very misleading word. You do not have to be "drunk" (ie poor judgement, loss of psychomotor control) to fail a breathalyser test, you just need a trace of alcohol in your blood stream.

The only sensible thing is to not drink at all if you have an early start the next day. A small price to pay to keep your job.
sharksandwich is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 06:56
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: North west UK
Age: 64
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the run up to x-mas drink drivers are a targeted, get them off the roads we all cry, but if your a pilot you are innocent!!!!!!
If he has provided a sample which has been over the proscribed limit, then he will have been charged.
The rest is just formality it's the way it works for everyone even pilots!!!!!!!
PA38 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 07:12
  #16 (permalink)  

the lunatic fringe
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 67
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the run up to x-mas drink drivers are a targeted, get them off the roads we all cry, but if your a pilot you are innocent!!!!!!
PA38 have you been at the bottle as well?

No one has suggested it is ok for a pilot to operate over the limit.

I shudder. This thread is already degenerating into the same mess the others have
L337 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 07:28
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any chance we can just link this thread to the interminable discussions on identical headlines past, and then close it, so we don't have to go round the same carousel again?
No, not really.

Wouldn't forgive a taxi driver, a bus driver, a camel driver, found to have too much alcohol in his/her blood.


No, the tests aren't conclusive.

Yes, they are sometimes inaccurate.


But, usually, as in DUI stops, there is a reason somebody gets "pulled over."

Can a regular drinker fly a plane?

Surely.

But, do we want someone who can "function" half-snockered at the pointy end?

I'm not convicting these boys without a jury, but can we please, please, once in a while assume that there must have been a valid reason for the event?

I personally don't fly commercial any oftener than I have to, and this is one of the reasons.

Flying commercial at one time was a pretty good guarantee of safety, of placing your butt into the loving, caring hands of consummate professionals.

Now, not so much.

It seems, these days, that boarding a flight means you're a member of a certain "risk pool."

Is it that we hear of this more often through better/faster reporting, or are instances of "don't give a poop" attitude issues becoming more frequent?

Should have written "more aggressive/faster" reporting, but all y'all get the idea.

Since when has it become fashionable to take 150+ lives for a ride when your condition to do so might even be a weensy bit in quesion?

(I already know the answer - since idiot SLF are willing to fly based on absolute lowest ticket $$)

Sometimes, one begins to look forward to the fully automated cockpit, with a dog who bites the man who tries to touch the controls.
rottenray is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 09:04
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
PA38,
Interests:
Aviation, BEER, electronics, BEER , computers & BEER
Really?

rottenray,
I personally don't fly commercial any oftener than I have to, and this is one of the reasons.

Flying commercial at one time was a pretty good guarantee of safety, of placing your butt into the loving, caring hands of consummate professionals.

Now, not so much.
Well, to be blunt, I do not agree with you but perhaps that's because I've been around a bit longer.
Stick to the majors with a track record and, if that doesn't suit then, like a couple of tearful, fear of flying women I saw on a TV documentary on board an elective holiday flight, perhaps you should consider land or sea transport.
Basil is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 09:14
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: some hotel
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see that CNN actually named the pilot ... for what purpose I don't really understand.
To attract viewers perhaps?
postman23 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 09:20
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: some hotel
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not convicting these boys without a jury, but can we please, please, once in a while assume that there must have been a valid reason for the event?

I personally don't fly commercial any oftener than I have to, and this is one of the reasons.

Since when has it become fashionable to take 150+ lives for a ride when your condition to do so might even be a weensy bit in quesion?
@Rottenray
Lighten up man, you say you don't convict, yet in the next line you do. Also you admit that most of the time there is no fire as there is no smoke. You obviously are not a pilot. ASSUME makes an ASS out of U and ME is the second lesson in flight school.

To your other point: in days gone by, a glass of red wine was tolerated and considered the norm with on board dining at certain airlines. If you are looking for blood on the wall keep on going but at least admit that you are just looking for sensation with that BS post.

Need I mention that I am commenting your words and not you as a person or can we take that as a given these days?



PS: it is this misplaced trust in so-called authorities, that more often than not lack qualified staff and standards, that causes the herd to become unsettled. Glued to the box, blindly following the 'news'. Forced make-believe crap after a thousand repetitons written on the blackboard.

I shall respect the teacher.
I shall respect the teacher.
I shall respect the teacher.
I shall respect the teacher.
I shall respect the teacher.

NOT...

Last edited by postman23; 11th Nov 2009 at 09:38. Reason: addendum
postman23 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.