One Key Fits All Boeing Flight Decks: Lord Janner
Guest
Posts: n/a
One Key Fits All Boeing Flight Decks: Lord Janner
From today's Telegraph:
According to sources, Lord Janner is apparently also a keen PPRuNer. 
One key to all Boeing cockpits, claims peer
By Andy McSmith
(Filed: 06/10/2001)
ALL Boeing aircraft use the same standard key to lock and unlock the cockpit door, a Labour peer alleged yesterday.
Lord Janner said it was "absolute madness" that there were thousands of keys in circulation that could be used to gain access to the cockpit on any passenger aircraft made by the American firm.
The only exception was the Boeing planes used by El Al, the Israeli national airline.
The standard keys are thought to have been issued at the request of the airlines, because pilots have to fly a different plane each day.
The peer said the issue had been raised with him by a serving airline pilot.
A Boeing spokesman said the company did not comment on security but recognised that it would have to be improved following the terrorist attacks.
Lord Janner, a prominent figure in Britain's Jewish community, said: "It is grotesque that there aren't separate keys and locks for each aircraft. It is absolute madness, particularly following the events of September 11.
"The Government must order that locks on these aircraft are changed."
He has also raised the fact that airline passengers are still served wine in long-stemmed glasses, although metal knives are now banned.
"They don't seem to have thought this through. If you break the bottom off one of the glasses, you've got a lethal weapon."
Lord Janner pressed for improvement to cockpit security by installing stronger doors and walls.
A Boeing spokesman said: "All our aircraft are designed and built to meet safety requirements of airlines and regulatory authorities."
The Civil Aviation Authority said: "The locking of cockpit doors is only one part of a specific set of procedures which are constantly under review by the CAA and the Department of Transport. It's the responsibility of airlines to ensure that there is no easy access to the flight deck."
By Andy McSmith
(Filed: 06/10/2001)
ALL Boeing aircraft use the same standard key to lock and unlock the cockpit door, a Labour peer alleged yesterday.
Lord Janner said it was "absolute madness" that there were thousands of keys in circulation that could be used to gain access to the cockpit on any passenger aircraft made by the American firm.
The only exception was the Boeing planes used by El Al, the Israeli national airline.
The standard keys are thought to have been issued at the request of the airlines, because pilots have to fly a different plane each day.
The peer said the issue had been raised with him by a serving airline pilot.
A Boeing spokesman said the company did not comment on security but recognised that it would have to be improved following the terrorist attacks.
Lord Janner, a prominent figure in Britain's Jewish community, said: "It is grotesque that there aren't separate keys and locks for each aircraft. It is absolute madness, particularly following the events of September 11.
"The Government must order that locks on these aircraft are changed."
He has also raised the fact that airline passengers are still served wine in long-stemmed glasses, although metal knives are now banned.
"They don't seem to have thought this through. If you break the bottom off one of the glasses, you've got a lethal weapon."
Lord Janner pressed for improvement to cockpit security by installing stronger doors and walls.
A Boeing spokesman said: "All our aircraft are designed and built to meet safety requirements of airlines and regulatory authorities."
The Civil Aviation Authority said: "The locking of cockpit doors is only one part of a specific set of procedures which are constantly under review by the CAA and the Department of Transport. It's the responsibility of airlines to ensure that there is no easy access to the flight deck."
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: MAN
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Changing the locks and having numerous keys may be a solution but difficult to administer on a large fleet. How about combination locks or finger print/iris identification as well. Is a modified door lock really going to keep a determined terrorist out - i dont think so.
Helicopter Pilots Get It Up Quicker
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trying to bring some cheer to the otherwise serious subject...
At least the the AA & RAC could open aviation sections for all those of us who seem to lose things or have locked the ignition key in the car....
[ 06 October 2001: Message edited by: pilotwolf ]
At least the the AA & RAC could open aviation sections for all those of us who seem to lose things or have locked the ignition key in the car....
[ 06 October 2001: Message edited by: pilotwolf ]
Just a thought. Why not make the cockpit door of full length bullet proof glass with a one way mirror, so that the pilots could see what is going on in the cabin, but the cabin occupants could not see through into the cockpit. That way, the cockpit crew would have early warning of a problem and take appropriate action such as violent flight manoeuvres.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: MAN
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Centaurus
Good idea - we will still be able to read the newspaper without upsetting the pax, but it still does not resolve the issue of the locks. We need to get in and out at present. Welfare/CRM and all that.
Good idea - we will still be able to read the newspaper without upsetting the pax, but it still does not resolve the issue of the locks. We need to get in and out at present. Welfare/CRM and all that.
Discussed this on my company site last week. 757 only needs a 60-80lb pull to overide the damn lock anyhow.
Bring back big, fat, smelly flight engineers!!! Nobody gave them any crap!
Key exists in case the captain goes a little bit myocardial whilst the FO is having a "catering offload" in the little room behind the flightdeck. Remember that Beech 18 where the pilot was screwing his passenger in the cabin and the door slammed shut? How about that Aeroflot Airbus with the (unconfirmed) report of two kids at the controls?
Extra door between FD and cabin.
Bring back big, fat, smelly flight engineers!!! Nobody gave them any crap!
Key exists in case the captain goes a little bit myocardial whilst the FO is having a "catering offload" in the little room behind the flightdeck. Remember that Beech 18 where the pilot was screwing his passenger in the cabin and the door slammed shut? How about that Aeroflot Airbus with the (unconfirmed) report of two kids at the controls?
Extra door between FD and cabin.
Don Quixote Impersonator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tried the individual key per aircraft, and I'm here to tell you it doesn't work.
Well it does lock the door, but if nobody's got the right key it can bring up some really interesting situations and I'm only talking about a fleet of 2 dozen aircraft.
Wound up with one key fits all and how do you then control the issue of keys and copying?
Bring on electronic or key card locks.
But the answer still lies on the ground BEFORE they get on board.
Well it does lock the door, but if nobody's got the right key it can bring up some really interesting situations and I'm only talking about a fleet of 2 dozen aircraft.
Wound up with one key fits all and how do you then control the issue of keys and copying?
Bring on electronic or key card locks.
But the answer still lies on the ground BEFORE they get on board.
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're all so worried about various methods of locking that stupid door, one way or another. It is irrelevant. Here is why.
Can anyone tell me how many attempts there have been at forcing a door open so far???
I have never heard of one. The door in every case was either not locked at all or opened by the crew themselves (obviously as a result of threats from terrorists).
So no matter how good your lock, the terrorist will convince the crew, one way or another, to open the damn door or else...
Can anyone tell me how many attempts there have been at forcing a door open so far???
I have never heard of one. The door in every case was either not locked at all or opened by the crew themselves (obviously as a result of threats from terrorists).
So no matter how good your lock, the terrorist will convince the crew, one way or another, to open the damn door or else...
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chatham Dockyard
I totally agree. The amount of cr*p being spouted not only here but in the press/media is .....
Gaunty and Centre Command are right.
What matters is what happens on the ground.
Hijackers aren't going to be stopped by the CAA's daft kneejerk reaction of immediately banning flight deck visits, or locked doors.
Also, and I realise this may be a more controversial view, but I think if security changes are so extreme that our lifestyles are dramatically changed (all our lifestyles, not just as aviators), then the terrorists have already won a major victory.
We have to accept some risk, or life will become unbearably restrictive. Two hour check-ins for domestic flights, for example, are unacceptable.
Plastic cuttlery, plastic 'glasses', where do you stop? Virtually anything can be used or adapted as a weapon by someone determined enough. Strip searches before flight? We have to keep some sense of proportion or the security restrictions will be unbearable.
I know a disgruntled/mentally deranged Fedex employee in the junpseat decided to try to get revenge on his company, but how many hijackers have asked permission to visit the flight deck?
Let's keep some sense of proportion.
I totally agree. The amount of cr*p being spouted not only here but in the press/media is .....
Gaunty and Centre Command are right.
What matters is what happens on the ground.
Hijackers aren't going to be stopped by the CAA's daft kneejerk reaction of immediately banning flight deck visits, or locked doors.
Also, and I realise this may be a more controversial view, but I think if security changes are so extreme that our lifestyles are dramatically changed (all our lifestyles, not just as aviators), then the terrorists have already won a major victory.
We have to accept some risk, or life will become unbearably restrictive. Two hour check-ins for domestic flights, for example, are unacceptable.
Plastic cuttlery, plastic 'glasses', where do you stop? Virtually anything can be used or adapted as a weapon by someone determined enough. Strip searches before flight? We have to keep some sense of proportion or the security restrictions will be unbearable.
I know a disgruntled/mentally deranged Fedex employee in the junpseat decided to try to get revenge on his company, but how many hijackers have asked permission to visit the flight deck?
Let's keep some sense of proportion.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I have here in front of me a copy of the "Direction to Aircraft Operators, Aerodrome Managers, Security Approved Cargo Agents, and Catering Undertakings under the Aviation Security Act 1982 Relating to Heightened Security Measures 2001", which was issued by DTLR on the 26th September.
Without going into detail, it's clear that many airlines - and airports - are going well beyond the guidelines set down by the DTLR. There is, for example, no restriction placed on the presence of glassware or metal cutlery on board UK aircraft (though razor blades (both open bladed and safety razors) are on the list, as are darts and knitting needles).
Perhaps instead of trying to lull pax into a false sense of security with those rather pointless exercises, maybe they should be employing the 'Dunkirk Spirit' and showing that no matter what terrorists try to do, we will continue with our way of life - unbowed and unintimidated.
Without going into detail, it's clear that many airlines - and airports - are going well beyond the guidelines set down by the DTLR. There is, for example, no restriction placed on the presence of glassware or metal cutlery on board UK aircraft (though razor blades (both open bladed and safety razors) are on the list, as are darts and knitting needles).
Perhaps instead of trying to lull pax into a false sense of security with those rather pointless exercises, maybe they should be employing the 'Dunkirk Spirit' and showing that no matter what terrorists try to do, we will continue with our way of life - unbowed and unintimidated.
Rebel PPRuNer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 50
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As an SLF, I just want to comment on why people do bring some things like razors on board - if you're on a late night flight into, say, STN for an early morning onward connection and then discover that (a) your bag wasn't tagged at the originating airport and (b) everything is closed at STN overnight then you start to wish you had a little bag of essentials to make an overnight at that rather chilly establishment more bearable.
This is of course a completely fictional situation
If loss of luggage wasn't a frequent occurrence people wouldn't want to bring most of it into the cabin - it's a pain in the ars* to lug about.
Just a thought.
This is of course a completely fictional situation
If loss of luggage wasn't a frequent occurrence people wouldn't want to bring most of it into the cabin - it's a pain in the ars* to lug about.
Just a thought.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: london,UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems to me we all have an individual key already - our ID & PIN.Why not fit all cockpit doors with swipers,& either a fleet database or even just the crew on the day?
[ 08 October 2001: Message edited by: rob777 ]
[ 08 October 2001: Message edited by: rob777 ]
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Essex,UK
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely it is not an issue if there is only 1 key to fit all if there was a bolt in the cockpit to lock the door, anyway I could imagine the outcry if the flight was delayed due to previous crew accidentally taking the key home !! 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i do not think you will ever be able to make the flight deck totally secure because you always have to allow for de-compression scenarios which includes some sort of blowout mech incorporated into the door structure.anyway who would try a hijack now,they would not stand a chance!!!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that all this talk of locked, bulletproof, security doors has overlooked one point. What happens when the crew need to go down the back for a pee??? The hijacker need only wait serupticiously at the flightdeck door after taking control of the cabin. I believe the only aircraft with a loo directly accesible from the flightdeck is the 747-400? So then, is the mod programme for thousands of aircraft going to include an entire new toilet installation as well as the "impenetrable" door??? I believe the best solution is (unfortunately) a semi automatic pistol on the flightdeck with a Captain who is not afraid to use it. Even this has its problems, day to day security of the weapon itself, and effects on the aircraft if it was actually used.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: toronto canada
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here's a suggestion to all. When all matters get uncontrollable, how about we have some form of immobilizing agent that will temporarily handicap an attacker so we as aviators can ensure a safe dissolve?, i am talking about some form of tear gas that can be dispensed in the enviromental system of the cabin. We as pilots, won't suffer from such discharge as we have our own means of providing a steady uncontaminated stream of breathable air (i.e. quick donnig mask coupled with smoke goggles). Of course the entire pax and remaining crew in the rear will suffer, but just a temporary dose that can be cleared of with minor minor side effects will suffice. This will give us time to make a desicion and a safe way to resolve a situation with just minor side effects and enough time to apprehend the culprits. How many hijackers/terrorist would think or be able to sneak a PBE on board. Plus we know all f/a stations should be armed with a pbe of their own, this however should be concealed. Get some laboratories to work on such an agent. This could be used in many different situations. This is what i think, and if anybody thinks that this could be a viable option and act as a last resort, together with having our cockpit doors locked at all times, i know we will have it made. and pls. I would like to get the credit if this ever materializes. good luck to all.