Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Southwest 737 lands at Yeager Airport after hole in fuselage

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Southwest 737 lands at Yeager Airport after hole in fuselage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jul 2009, 16:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: YBBN
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank $DEITY it wasn't an Airbus....
yssy.ymel is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 17:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,076
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Charley West does have some challenging aspects but nothing to the point of overflying it if they needed down pronto, especially so if the crew was familiar with the airport.

It's no Aspen.
West Coast is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 17:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Here, there, everywhere
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yssy.ymel, to speculate for just a minute - I would guess you hit it right on there.

Being a SWA -300, I can only imagine that it is a high cycle airframe. Despite the best safeguards in place, fatigue related failure can occur when least expected.

As stated, the uniform shaped hole suggests that the tear strips did their job.

Now what would have happened if a pax/hostie had been stood under the hole a la the Aloha incident....
Love_joy is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 17:39
  #24 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with West Coast, Charley West is a bit intimidating, mostly because it does look like you are landing on an aircraft carrier, granted a very long aircraft carrier. However, as he stated it is certainly no Aspen.

I have landed 727s and other smaller jets at CRW a few times, however, I am much more familiar with ASE. I'm sure the reason why they landed at CRW will come out in the near future.

But to be very honest, CRW would not have been my first choice, but then again, I was not flying the aircraft. I'm sure they had a very valid reason and I'm not going to second guess the crew.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 18:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Love_joy
Being a SWA -300, I can only imagine that it is a high cycle airframe.
Registration N387SW
Serial 26602
Line Number 2627

First Flight 16.06.94
Delivery Date 29.06.94

Airframe is apparently 15 years old. Not particularly elderly...
DozyWannabe is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 18:30
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After viewing the photo,s it appears that the hole has regular edges as if it is a panel that has partially detached!
Good picture - you can even determine the (empty) edge rivnut's with their proper spacing - all indicative of a missing plate or antenna patch.

What? . . . No fatties sucked out James Bond style as in the movies?
L-38 is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 20:09
  #27 (permalink)  
IGh
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Castlegar
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Similar to B727 failure

Someplace there's a photo of a similar fuselage SKIN failure, on a B727. I can't find the photo, I see there are several B727 cases that read about the same as this B737 case, eg:

= = = \/ = = =

ASIAS BRIEF REPORT... ACCIDENT AND INCIDENT DATABASE
Report Number: 19881226056139C
Local Date: 26-DEC-88
City: CHARLESTON
State: WV
Airport Name: YEAGER
... MINOR
Aircraft Make: BOEING
Aircraft Model: 727-200
... Airframe Hrs: 68035
... EASTERN AIR LINES
NARRATIVE

AIRCRAFT EXPERIENCED RAPID DECOMPRESSION. EMERGENCY DESCENT AND LANDED. FUSELAGE SKIN FAILURE CAUSED PROBLEM.

and

CHI87IA067 January 25, 1987 B727-122, : N7015U EXTERIOR SKIN FAILED IN FATIGUE ... CRUISE ... LOST CABIN PRESSURE .... MASKS AUTOMATICALLY DEPLOYED.
IGh is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 20:40
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Petaluma
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
68,035 hours TT

That's TEN YEARS airborne, god knows cycles. That's all??
Will Fraser is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 20:46
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
aerial picture of CRW

File:20090121 0693 Yeager Airport.JPG - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
smith is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 21:44
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well all's well that ends well. Post 2 shows somebody made a very definite decision and did a good job of slowing it all down in time. I agree with an earlier poster that at least one of the crew was probably familiar with the airport, and even if not, I still don't think it the worst decision ever made.
greuzi is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 21:53
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hole in US plane forces landing

The US carrier Southwest Airlines has inspected about 200 planes after a hole opened up in the passenger cabin during a flight, forcing an emergency landing.

BBC NEWS | Americas | Hole in US plane forces landing


quant is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 23:19
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
two things

one, does anyone have the full report on the 727 that had something similiar happen to it? will you post it?

two: alot has been made of my post questioning CRW as an emergency airport. I meant it as a thought provoker. IF the plane could have kept going to a better airport, the crew would have. So, I am saying that things might have been worse then they appeared.
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 23:45
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South West
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Fatigue

yssy.ymel and Love_Joy
As somebody with a bit of experience of 737 Classic heavy maintenance I completely agree with you - fatigue crack. I've seen cracks around there before but not in that exact location. Size of the hole looks to me pretty much as per the tear straps.
Sonic Bam is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 23:57
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CRW landing

I've been into CRW several times with the 737NG. No sweat, no fret, piece-a-cake.
furloughed_again is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 23:58
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,494
Received 152 Likes on 83 Posts
Thank $DEITY it wasn't an Airbus....
OK I'll bite.

Why would an Airbus have been a bigger problem in this case?
TURIN is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2009, 00:31
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UIP : 4° 10’ 0” W, 47° 58’ 0” N
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I have to ask too. What would be different if it was an Airbus 318/19/20/21? I'm not mech or engineer so it's a sheer curiosity.
EISNN is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2009, 01:54
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Over the hill and far away
Age: 76
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it possible that yssy-ymel was thinking of the publicity bandwagon that would have started to roll:- "Yet Another Airbus Disaster/Near Disaster" sort of thing in the world's tabloids (and possibly even here on PPRuNe, perish the thought)?

Last edited by kenhughes; 15th Jul 2009 at 01:55. Reason: Spel cheking
kenhughes is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2009, 02:24
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: YBBN
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's it Ken. It appears every time there is an incident involving an Airbus airframe, there is a hurricane of st produced linking each and every Airbus incident with each other.

Ill informed, unprofessional reporting by the media, and some pretty silly discussions on here don't help much either.
yssy.ymel is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2009, 02:56
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Petaluma
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't such comment be not fact based? Where is the skin on Airbus implicated in failure? Fatigue is associated with metals, yes? At least in this case, AB would get a pass, especially here ??

Will
Will Fraser is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2009, 03:07
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
> Now what would have happened if a pax/hostie had been stood > under the hole a la the Aloha incident.... Well, fair question; would that have plugged this hole, or caused it to get bigger? (I realize we won't know unless they test this somehow ...)
ankh is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.