Air Canada A320 loss of control in flight: 14/4/09
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Air Canada A320 loss of control in flight: 14/4/09
Any more details on the following report from Avherald?
Incident: Air Canada A320 near Montreal on Apr 14th 2009, loss of control in flight
By Simon Hradecky, created Wednesday, Apr 15th 2009 21:41Z, last updated Wednesday, Apr 15th 2009 21:41Z
An Air Canada Airbus A320-200, registration C-FTJQ performing flight AC-926 from Montreal Trudeau,QC (Canada) to Fort Lauderdale,FL (USA), was enroute at FL360 about 170nm south of Montreal about 30 minutes into the flight, when the crew requested to return to Montreal and reported problems with the flight controls. The airplane was on final approach to runway 06L about one nautical mile before touchdown, when the crew declared emergency and requested emergency services to standby. The airplane continued for a safe touch down and stopped on the runway for about 10 minutes. The crew reported, that they had experienced "severe mechanical turbulence" and had lost control of the airplane momentarily.
A replacement Airbus A320-200 registration C-FFWI resumed the flight and reached Fort Lauderdale with a delay of 3:45 hours.
FlightAware > Live Flight Tracker > Air Canada #926 > 14-Apr-2009 > CYUL-KFLL
By Simon Hradecky, created Wednesday, Apr 15th 2009 21:41Z, last updated Wednesday, Apr 15th 2009 21:41Z
An Air Canada Airbus A320-200, registration C-FTJQ performing flight AC-926 from Montreal Trudeau,QC (Canada) to Fort Lauderdale,FL (USA), was enroute at FL360 about 170nm south of Montreal about 30 minutes into the flight, when the crew requested to return to Montreal and reported problems with the flight controls. The airplane was on final approach to runway 06L about one nautical mile before touchdown, when the crew declared emergency and requested emergency services to standby. The airplane continued for a safe touch down and stopped on the runway for about 10 minutes. The crew reported, that they had experienced "severe mechanical turbulence" and had lost control of the airplane momentarily.
A replacement Airbus A320-200 registration C-FFWI resumed the flight and reached Fort Lauderdale with a delay of 3:45 hours.
FlightAware > Live Flight Tracker > Air Canada #926 > 14-Apr-2009 > CYUL-KFLL
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In the shed
Age: 78
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
captplaystation
You wouldn't be suggesting - in the most subtle way - that FBW is, perhaps, not entirely, 100% completely and without question, foolproof, would you?
You wouldn't be suggesting - in the most subtle way - that FBW is, perhaps, not entirely, 100% completely and without question, foolproof, would you?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think unfortunately, that has been proven several times, be it the "system" or the poor humans inability to sucessfully interface with it, often with loss of life, or in the Qantas case perhaps merely a loss of personal hygeine 
IMHO it is a can of worms and everytime something else happens always we end up with the FBW defenders vs the luddites. We have done it to death so often here, purely my opinion, but no I don't trust it any more than I would a politician.
IMHO it is a can of worms and everytime something else happens always we end up with the FBW defenders vs the luddites. We have done it to death so often here, purely my opinion, but no I don't trust it any more than I would a politician.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: middle of nowhere
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And just why isn't anybody surprised, alarmed or outraged?
We all shrug our shoulders and think: "Nothing we can do about it, at least it didn't happen to me".
Brave new world!
We all shrug our shoulders and think: "Nothing we can do about it, at least it didn't happen to me".
Brave new world!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: East Molesey, Surrey, UK
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Captplaystation
Luddite about FBW, eh? That include the 777? Then the 787?
Or are we talking sidesticks versus something between your legs?
As for just shrugging, what else is there to do until we actually know something? At present we know the square root of sweet FA.
Luddite about FBW, eh? That include the 777? Then the 787?
Or are we talking sidesticks versus something between your legs?
As for just shrugging, what else is there to do until we actually know something? At present we know the square root of sweet FA.
I remember being shown a quite innocuous series of hydraulic and fbw failures in the A320 sim that collectively induced a rapid increase in pitch that had to be countered by smart action on the trim wheel and simultaneous disconnection of the auto thrust.It was not pleasant even when you knew it was coming.Airbus fbw is definetley not for the complacent.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When you lose the FBW the Airbus still gives you mechanical flight...does it not?...
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...facts and figures...
...once again wait to be extracted/downloaded from the very magic DFDR of said aircraft and subsequently being put in perspective for said incident by the real professionals of the Canadian AAIB and Air Canada...
...as an Airbus A320 series pilot myself, desperately waiting for the initial outcome of the probe with valuable hints for our daily ops, however I already fear the deja vue of loads of rubbish statements of all those desperate "hobby" wannabee AAIB posters in this thread...
...as an Airbus A320 series pilot myself, desperately waiting for the initial outcome of the probe with valuable hints for our daily ops, however I already fear the deja vue of loads of rubbish statements of all those desperate "hobby" wannabee AAIB posters in this thread...
hetfield;
That applies to the 330/340 but less so to the 320 series - the aircraft can (and has, I have been told by someone who did it, in test flights) be flown to the landing on the stab trim alone. I've done it in the sim and while it's not pretty, it isn't an automatic accident either.
That said, I see the anti-AB, anti-fbw troups are out in force, jawing without having the slightest idea as to what happened, (because they don't yet know) and why, (because they haven't flown the Airbus and know nothing about it), but ready to tell us, without knowledge and understanding, that any Airbus incident is "proof that the Airbus, and fbw are dangerous", which is nonsense.
The issues associated with the 320 series are knowledge and training based, not design based.
The Boeing question has not been answered, nor have any obvious-though-unasked questions regarding military aircraft and fbw. One would be much farther ahead in learning about and discussing the habits of the DC10 and MD11. "The DC10 Case", (Suny press) is well worth reading. No such books are available/written on the Airbus and fbw because the accident rate is not anomalous when compared with similar types/routes etc.
CerealAbuser;
In a word, yes. Providing the aircraft has hydraulics, the rudder and horizontal stab are available. There are no fatal accidents caused through loss of control through failure of fbw. Such failure is far more rare than loss of control through complete loss of hydraulics, which has resulted in fatal accidents.
The design is to keep it flying until one/some/all flt ctl computers are back. It's not designed to fly an approach.
That said, I see the anti-AB, anti-fbw troups are out in force, jawing without having the slightest idea as to what happened, (because they don't yet know) and why, (because they haven't flown the Airbus and know nothing about it), but ready to tell us, without knowledge and understanding, that any Airbus incident is "proof that the Airbus, and fbw are dangerous", which is nonsense.
The issues associated with the 320 series are knowledge and training based, not design based.
The Boeing question has not been answered, nor have any obvious-though-unasked questions regarding military aircraft and fbw. One would be much farther ahead in learning about and discussing the habits of the DC10 and MD11. "The DC10 Case", (Suny press) is well worth reading. No such books are available/written on the Airbus and fbw because the accident rate is not anomalous when compared with similar types/routes etc.
CerealAbuser;
When you lose the FBW the Airbus still gives you mechanical flight...does it not?...
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Not over the Rockies anymore.
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hetfield;
Quote:
The design is to keep it flying until one/some/all flt ctl computers are back. It's not designed to fly an approach.
What if it takes more time (for the flt ctl comps to come back) than you have fuel?!
Sounds funny, that's all. Not really pro or con as far as the bus is concerned.
Quote:
The design is to keep it flying until one/some/all flt ctl computers are back. It's not designed to fly an approach.
What if it takes more time (for the flt ctl comps to come back) than you have fuel?!
Sounds funny, that's all. Not really pro or con as far as the bus is concerned.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@act700
To make it clear. My post wasn't MY opinion!
It's the way I have been trained on A320 with a major Western Carrier.
regards
To make it clear. My post wasn't MY opinion!
It's the way I have been trained on A320 with a major Western Carrier.
regards
Last edited by hetfield; 16th Apr 2009 at 17:34.
Having had a look at the TSB Canada website I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for a report from them on this one!
The most recent report they have on their website is of a hard landing of a balloon in August 2007!
Transportation Safety Board of Canada - AVIATION REPORTS
The most recent report they have on their website is of a hard landing of a balloon in August 2007!
Transportation Safety Board of Canada - AVIATION REPORTS
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hope its not self-inflicted...one of our great men of genius, fancied himself a computer expert and thought that turning off the flight control computers momentarily would correct whatever problem they had.
Iceman49;
The Airbus 320/330/340 QRHs have mandatory reset procedures for troubleshooting all computers on board which may affect the operation. These procedures have been in use for a very long time and will be trained for and should be well understood. One just doesn't launch on a troubleshooting expedition in the 320 or any computerized device with home-grown or internet-researched "solutions". If a crew doesn't go by the book, then that is a training and standards issue, not an airplane issue.
act700;
Well, aside from being a straw-man argument, when serious problems arise, like any professional airman would, you deal with it...obviously. That's what we do. That said, the most serious computer issue to occur thus far, (QANTAS A330), did not present this problem. Not saying it can't happen but your question is quite far into hypothetical vs possible/probable. Such a scenario is not even in any training syllabus I know of - you're simply expected to deal with it.
The A320 is quite flyable on reduced ELAC/SEC/FAC authority, as described. Just as some people still think that "stall" means the engines quit on an airplane, some believe that the 320 stops flying when the computers "quit" - its a much more sophisticated design than that and if we think about it, would have to be to have survived this long without a computer-related accident.
Cheers,
PJ2
Hope its not self-inflicted...one of our great men of genius, fancied himself a computer expert and thought that turning off the flight control computers momentarily would correct whatever problem they had.
act700;
What if it takes more time (for the flt ctl comps to come back) than you have fuel?!
The A320 is quite flyable on reduced ELAC/SEC/FAC authority, as described. Just as some people still think that "stall" means the engines quit on an airplane, some believe that the 320 stops flying when the computers "quit" - its a much more sophisticated design than that and if we think about it, would have to be to have survived this long without a computer-related accident.
Cheers,
PJ2
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: At home
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The issues associated with the 320 series are knowledge and training based, not design based.
