Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Turkish airliner crashes at Schiphol

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Turkish airliner crashes at Schiphol

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Mar 2013, 15:02
  #2901 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blind pew
I must correct you on your statement re autocratic captain..whilst somewhat correct the accident cause lies in an incompetent bullying management, incorrect training and poor maintanence. This was reflected in the press of the time but the inquiry's conclusions were incorrect..partly due to evidence being withheld or manipulated.
Admittedly that's a side of the story I don't know so well (the accident itself was a little over 6 years before I was born), so if you could PM me with some details that'd be grand. I'm not sure about evidence being withheld as such, but I do know that the comparative lack of hard evidence as to why the droops were raised was the primary motivator behind CVRs becoming mandatory on G-registered civil transports with almost immediate effect, which for the UK civil service was very unusual.

Last edited by DozyWannabe; 2nd Mar 2013 at 15:05.
DozyWannabe is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2013, 20:56
  #2902 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DozyWannabe you referred briefly, in passing, to the Trident accident in 1972 and stated that ... the autocratic tendencies of the flight commander rendered the rest of the crew's input moot...

Given the obvious care and thought you take with your posts, I say, with respect, that I think it would have been fairer if you had made it clear that this particular statement was your opinion, rather than to have stated it as accepted fact.

I suggest that few pilots around at that time would disagree with the statement that the captain could be autocratic, but there was nothing in the AAIB report to suggest that he had, in your words, ...rendered the crew’s input moot... on this flight.

If you would like to read the AAIB report, it can be found here

As I believe blind pew is hinting at, I think it would be a much more rigorous investigation these days, with more evidence being unearthed and made available to the enquiry, resulting in a rather different report, but then, that’s just my opinion!

Last edited by Trident Sim; 3rd Mar 2013 at 01:02.
Trident Sim is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2013, 22:03
  #2903 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Forest
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CRM 2B or not 2B

I was serving at the time of BEA 548 and I knew those involved. I maker no comment on the accident per se but the CRM aspect of this thread attracts my attention. I joined the company from the military where I had been an “Independent” Flight Commander. I was very aware of the stresses and strains apparent in the company chain of command (and that is quite definitely another story – which will probably never be told!). As to “bullying management” (Blind Pew), I would suggest that in those days, management was extremely benign compared to what it later became. One would have no hesitation at all in going upstairs to relate ones problems (and cock-ups) pro bono publico (or, at least, for the other crews).
I had to start at the very bottom, as a “third pilot” with only one ring, looked on with contempt by all and sundry in the crew room. I learned to hold my tongue and observe and sometimes it was not a pretty sight. Because of my background – and nothing to do with CRM, which had not even been invented then – I had no hesitation in voicing my concerns and can categorically state that on certainly two occasions I averted disaster, once with probably only one second to spare. In my dotage, morbid curiosity has got the better of me and I have actually been to see the valley where 150 people might have gone to meet their Maker. On other occasions, there might certainly have been considerable embarrassment, but not necessarily any real danger.
And sometimes, old coals are best left unraked. We all learned our lessons – the hard way. As I said, this was before the days of CRM. Or was it?
Prober is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2013, 03:42
  #2904 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trident Sim
Given the obvious care and thought you take with your posts, I say, with respect, that I think it would have been fairer if you had made it clear that this particular statement was your opinion, rather than to have stated it as accepted fact.

I suggest that few pilots around at that time would disagree with the statement that the captain could be autocratic, but there was nothing in the AAIB report to suggest that he had, in your words, ...rendered the crew’s input moot... on this flight.
Thanks for the kind words (and thanks for the follow-up blind pew - I'll get on it ASAP!). It's not so much an opinion I arrived at myself as what I had been led to believe by most of the material I've read on the matter. Now of course, because there was no CVR to provide hard data, all the report can say for certain is what was derived from the wreckage and the FDR and any embellishment is supposition - however on balance of probability I have always understood that it was a likely contributory factor, even if indirect.

I wasn't intending to go into that much detail because the intent was to use it as a probable example of why CRM became so important, and the thread is not about BEA548.

That said, thanks for the extra info and regards!
DozyWannabe is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2014, 21:45
  #2905 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post-crash video of Turkish Airlines Flight 1951
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=dd1_1392461371
drdino is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2014, 07:04
  #2906 (permalink)  
Green Guard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
soft wet soil played a good agent to prevent fire , similar to one Onur Air MD80 in Eelde not very far from Amsterdam in 2003
 
Old 16th Feb 2014, 18:10
  #2907 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 76
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
soft wet soil

Cannot quite follow why this particular subject has been resurrected, with yet another picture of the accident site and the effacatious qualities of soft wet soil. Could it be that as we now have lots of wet soil, courtesy of Zeus, all those aloft over the UK are quite safe. Good publicity to revive our battered tourist industry perhaps.
Chronus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.