Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Continental TurboProp crash inbound for Buffalo

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Continental TurboProp crash inbound for Buffalo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Feb 2009, 13:35
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Found in Toronto
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Colgan Air began operating the Q400 about one year ago. Prior to that they also operated other turbo-props like the Saab 340.

I sincerely doubt that "time on type" had anything to do with this accident.
Lost in Saigon is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 13:35
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Stockholm
Age: 50
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
plot for that house isn't too big, must have augered almost straight in to just take out one home.
CecilRooseveltHooks is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 13:36
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: long island
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When the television stations decide to go wall-to-wall coverage, I suppose it is inevitable that the drivel content will be increased substantially.

One interview however with a witness on the ground seemed to sound more credible than usual, as he described his own driving direction (east) and stated that the aircraft which he saw was travelling in the opposite direction from normal landings and approaches to 23.

The other tidbit which keeps recurring on at least some broadcasts is to the effect that "the crew reported mechanical problems before the crash". If so, could this have been done on a company frequency and ATC totally unaware of it?
finfly1 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 13:40
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 73
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Colgan Air began operating the Q400 about one year ago.
And have days ago optioned 15 more.

Bombardier Grants Option Rights to Colgan Air, Inc. for 15 Q400 NextGen Aircraft
boaclhryul is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 14:25
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crew:

Capt. Marvin Renslow, joined Colgan 9/2005, 3379 flying hours with Colgan.
FAA Airman records show him type-certified on both the Dash-8 and the Saab.
FO Rebecca Shaw, joined Colgan 1/2008, 2244 flying hours with Colgan.
FAA records show her type-certified but limited to second-in-command on the Dash-8.
She was also a certified flight instructor for smaller single-engine planes.
FAs Matilda Quintero and Donna Prisco, joined Colgan 5/2008
Also aboard, off-duty Capt. Joseph Zuffoletto
PlatinumFlyer is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 14:27
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATC feed

captainspeaking (tab #55), the stream from LiveATC.net is from a scanner that picks up the tower, approach and departure frequencies. See U.S. Class C Airport Feeds | Live Air Traffic Control Audio Feeds | LiveATC.net

All three show up on the clip that is circulating.
chucko is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 14:38
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
For this type turboprop what recommendations have been incorporated in FCOM's for icing conditions during approach?

Presumably the aircraft is certificated to land in icing conditions, but there might be minimization techniques to avoid sudden upsets?
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 14:58
  #68 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
finfly1;
One interview however with a witness on the ground seemed to sound more credible than usual, as he described his own driving direction (east) and stated that the aircraft which he saw was travelling in the opposite direction from normal landings and approaches to 23.
I listened to that interview as well and it was a very "rational", calmly described eye-witness account - very credible, so far as eye/ear witness accounts go.

The aircraft was described as:

- Low...300, 400ft
- Descending "steeply", but he qualifed that by saying he was looking at it "up through the top of his windshield" and it was (as you say) going away from him, (so judging "steepness" from that angle is difficult - they all look "steep")
- left wing slightly low, no extreme bank angle
- landing gear "up"
- no fire anywhere on the airplane
- "unusual engine noise", but he admitted he doesn't fly that often so it all may be "unusual".
- The direction of the flight was north to northwest and not south.


The eyewitness lives in the apartment one house away from the crash-site.

The approach they appeared to be planning was the ILS - are there any NOTAMS indicating unservicabilities of the ILS system that anyone flightplanning into that area may know about?
PJ2 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 14:58
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Found in Toronto
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Farrell
windshield wipers as ice-detectors
Many types of aircraft use windshield wipers posts for ice detection. Do you have a problem with that?

EDIT: I guess he changed his mind because he deleted his post... Or the mods deleted it for him?


Last edited by Lost in Saigon; 13th Feb 2009 at 15:20.
Lost in Saigon is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 14:59
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Roswell Georgia
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1000 hours per calender year for 121 ops in the US.
RWEDAREYET is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 15:05
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Notre Dame IN USA
Age: 82
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TabsAZ--
I was watching Anderson Cooper until after 2am. Both he and the assisting pilot [Tillman?] mentioned that there *was* a tape, not that there was not. Also, Anderson kept trying to keep a lid on the speculation by reporting only what they knew was confirmed. I thought it was an excellent job of reporting.
RiverCity is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 15:06
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oxenfforrdde
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn

Sad, 9/11 widow killed in crash.


9/11 widow killed in crash - , - Latest news & weather forecasts - MSN News UK
Tyres O'Flaherty is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 15:33
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Immediately after a ???07 was instructed to descend and maintain 6000'. The pilot replied with callsign only - no readback of level...
Is this normal practice in the States? It sounds unsafe to me. The ATCO never picked the pilots up on it either??
Buffalo approach control uses 2 different frequencies. In this case the one controller is working both sectors and transmitting on both frequencies. The radio is scanning both Buffalo approach frequencies (as well as Tower). There appears to be a delay function of 1 to 2 seconds either programmed or built into the scanner, so it will stop scanning momentarily after each transmission. If the controller transmits and the scanner happens to stop on the frequency that the aircraft is not on (50/50 chance) then the beginning of the aircraft's transmission will be missed because of the scanning delay. This appears to be evident with transmission heard from other aircraft on the tape as well. It is quite likely that the altitude readback was transmitted but just not picked up in the recording.

JC
-JC- is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 15:53
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Toronto
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Continental TurboProp crash inbound for Buffalo

Question for Dash-8 pilots:

Does the wing/prop/engine anti-ice system on the Dash-8 work automatically or does it have to be physically turned on in icing conditions to work? Just wondering....
LastCall is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 15:59
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: America
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Possible mechanical fault in the de-ice system? If one wing was working and the other wasn't, the iced-up wing could have stalled as they leveled and slowed at 2,300'.
Murexway is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 16:10
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortuntaely, as an ATCO, I've experienced this sort of incident before, i.e aircraft stops communicating.
Whatever was the cause, it happened very quickly and I'd be very suprised if ice was the major factor but the investigating authorities will make their fndings known ASAP.
All credit to the people in charge on the ground and their responses to the media, it's clear that their prority is to anyone on board and their relatives.

Whoever is coordinating all of the terrible events - well done to you.
goatface is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 16:19
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there are 5 seperate deice boots on LE of each wing, once turned to auto should operate in a sequence that shouldnt cause imbalance. IF operating normally
And the high "T" tail horizontal stabilizer? Looks like a lot of surface area way back there for the size of the aircraft.
L-38 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 16:26
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some speculation, but please check me on the facts.

It looks like (google map) and sounds like (ATC recording) that 3407 was flying towards the ILS to intercept it. I thought I heard the ATC say something about no autoland, due to variances in the ILS. So where the plane went down (about 1-2 miles north of the runway 23 centerline), looks like it might be a spot where one might disconnect the autopilot, to hand fly the ILS capture and final descent.
Flight Safety is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 16:29
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Icing

Ofcourse there is no idea of speculate of the reason but similar accidents have happened before. We had one in Sweden (Stockholm) long time ago where a 4 eng turboprop (vickers vicount) nosedived on short approach. That was due to heavy icing on the tail and when crew selected landingflaps the center of gravity changes rapidly and the tail could not support that with the icing and just nosedived into ground killing all omboard.
Weather that has something to do with this time will tell.
But a sad day for aviation is it nevertheless

Wings 1011
wings1011 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 16:32
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The leading edges of the T-tail also has pneumatic de-ice boots on the Q400, in addition to those on the wing leading edges and engine intakes.

As has been said, the apparent wx conditions well within the capabilities of the 400's de-ice system provided it was operating normally. From what I recall, the system needs to be selected manually to 'ON', and once selected runs in an automatic cycle. Detection of icing conditions determined by an ice detection system (message displayed on centre EFIS screen alongside engine instruments), with additional visual cues coming from the ice detection spigot on the wiper arms, and from visual inspection of approximately 2.5m of the wings visible from the flight deck.

However, the de-ice system on the 400 is prone to minor failures (with a caution illuminating on the master warning/caution panel), requiring crews to exit & avoid icing conditions. Had this been the case, I would expect the crew would have had ample time and opportunity to alert ATC should that have been necessary.

As for the 'chainsaw' sound reported by one witness, I doubt it would be the PTU. It's operation is fairly hard to detect on board the a/c, let alone as a ground-based observer.
Otto Throttle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.