Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Ryanair incident Ciampino.

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Ryanair incident Ciampino.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Dec 2008, 18:39
  #381 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah,
there are every type you could hope (or not) to meet there.

Not too sure it isn't 45989/Kremin/5tarbuck land, could anyone really be bothered mind you, just to give credence to their point of view by having 3 user names ?
Well, stranger things have happened & CaptK certainly does have some strange views on the world he inhabits, his "Alitalia" contributions being a case in point.
captplaystation is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 00:51
  #382 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Top Bunk
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ps2 or 3
600 odd posts in a similar vein............tedious
Dunno who the other two you refer to are. Please enlighten

Strong parallels with Anglo Irish Bank will emerge with your next results methinks.
Pretty close to the endgame I'd say
45989 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 08:44
  #383 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ref Irish banks/RYR see my response on post 388, I certainly don't discount the possibiliy, as I said " nothing is sacred".

Ref the "other two" versions of you, line 3 post 391.

Your other alter egos or just kindred spirits ?
captplaystation is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 12:10
  #384 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Top Bunk
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cpt PS

Fair enough.My point though is about how our profession has been devalued over the years by nitwits who are prepared to pay to fly regardless of the longer term implication for pay and conditions.
I would take advantage of the same fecwits if I was running any business that needed a steady supply of (willing) cannon fodder.
Shame is the model only works in a continuously expanding scenario.
The game is up for Micko
The recession has killed the expansion, UK MARKET AND CURRENCY now dead in the water
Shedloads of a/c coming.............
45989 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 12:20
  #385 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a little bit a "generation" thing. The guys coming into this business now are the " I want it & I want it now" or "me me me" generation, so regretably see it right & proper to by- pass the years it took me to get to the right hand seat of a jet. Instant gratification is the name of the game for their ilk.
Sad but true, and Ryanair and many other operators are only too happy to exploit it, and sell them what they want.
I totally agree, the business model is heavily dependant on expansion, and certainly if you look at the pax figures at the base I am familiar with, they are about 15% down on this time last year ( that is what is admitted so could be a lot worse) when 15% up would be the norm. So, in reality 30% down on what would normally be expected.
It will indeed be interesting to re-visit this in 1 years time, and I don't disagree, there is a possibility it could all end in tears. The tears though will be shared by many bods not connected to RYR too. Imagine what dumping around 2000 737 qualified pilots on the market would do to the terms & conditions elsewhere, not pretty methinks.
captplaystation is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 11:52
  #386 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Fair enough.My point though is about how our profession has been devalued over the years by nitwits who are prepared to pay to fly regardless of the longer term implication for pay and conditions."

Having to pay for your own training benefits noone (other than the airlines), least of all the poor souls footing the bill to do the job they want to do.
Flamin_Squirrel is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 15:55
  #387 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the Old Folks' Home
Posts: 420
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Paying for Training

Having to pay for your own training benefits noone (other than the airlines), least of all the poor souls footing the bill to do the job they want to do.
Almost everyone who goes beyond high school pays for his training. My parents and I paid for my degree so that I could get the job I wanted. What's wrong with that?
Smilin_Ed is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 17:29
  #388 (permalink)  
I call you back
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alpha quadrant
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You needed to achive certain grades to get into your course.

You only need money to fly.
Faire d'income is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2008, 08:48
  #389 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Almost everyone who goes beyond high school pays for his training. My parents and I paid for my degree so that I could get the job I wanted. What's wrong with that?
The supposition was that those who pay for learning to fly are some how stupid. I was just pointing out that's a fallacy. The rights or wrongs are either here nor there.
Flamin_Squirrel is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2008, 09:02
  #390 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fact, very few if any airlines now sponsor cadets,
Fact2 lots of people still want to do this job or ? who knows.

Therefore if you want it you have to pay for it.

Doesn't mean you are the creme de la creme if you get sponsored, or a duffer if you pay.
I have flown with guys who reinforce this stereotype, and just as often with those (from both sides ) who completely defy this (warped) logic.
It's just a numbers thing at the moment,same percentage of capable folk, few few sponsorships.
captplaystation is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2018, 18:00
  #391 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my head
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Final Report (December 2018) on Ciampino Birdstrike November 2008

Did someone get away with handing in their homework 10 years late?: http://www.ansv.it/cgi-bin/ita/Report%20EI-DYG.pdf


PS Original PPRuNe thread closed and forgotten, but the report is worth a read.
slip and turn is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2018, 19:16
  #392 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ball flock at low altitude

too many birds ingested into core due to low rpm on approach followed by an advance in power request while the birds were still being processed in the compressor..

I'm not sure that many engines could handle this combination, so best to reduce the occurrence rate in some manner.

I don't recall anything similar in combination since
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2018, 00:37
  #393 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: US
Age: 66
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by lomapaseo
Ball flock at low altitude

too many birds ingested into core due to low rpm on approach followed by an advance in power request while the birds were still being processed in the compressor..

I'm not sure that many engines could handle this combination, so best to reduce the occurrence rate in some manner.

I don't recall anything similar in combination since
Many years ago at SNA airport a Delta 757 sustained multiple bird strikes from seagulls right at rotation. One engine quit right away and the other would have failed shortly after however the Captain chose to abort the takeoff despite having rotated and being well past V1 on a 5700 foot runway. His decision to abort after V1 saved everyone’s life on the aircraft even though all training manuals said continue. It’s a testament to the 757 that the aircraft stopped on the runway.
Sailvi767 is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2018, 07:13
  #394 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SV Marie Celeste
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sailivi, would it not make more sense to read the report first and comment afterwards. They DID have enough energy to do a normal landing as they where in fact a bit high, a bit fast and they had a tailwind. They did not have a total loss of thrust either, the engines maintained approx 41% N1 (while commanded at TOGA thrust). The first point of ground contact was almost halfway down the runway. The (very understandable) decision to Go Around led to a stall and a hard landing in a stalled condition. The moral of the story is if you have to go through a flock of birds in short final it is better to continue to land with engines at low power than trying to GA at GA power. Partly because at low power most of the birds will go just through the fan and at high power they will go through the hot section.

I am sure I would not have done any better than the crew involved nevertheless it is interesting to learn what could have worked.
calypso is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2018, 09:35
  #395 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just an SLF but it's a good report, it's evident that until this one there wasn't a great deal of advice on what to do in the event of a birdstrike at that stage of flight and the aircraft manual was updated following the incident with the emphasis to consider continuing the landing if you were still likely to make it.

Also good to see that Ryan policy allowed for manual flight, if that still the same now, one would hope so given the amount of recent botched landing attempts where some crews lack basic skills due to always using the automatics.
Ben_S is online now  
Old 29th Dec 2018, 10:25
  #396 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ben_S
Just an SLF but it's a good report, it's evident that until this one there wasn't a great deal of advice on what to do in the event of a birdstrike at that stage of flight and the aircraft manual was updated following the incident with the emphasis to consider continuing the landing if you were still likely to make it.

Also good to see that Ryan policy allowed for manual flight, if that still the same now, one would hope so given the amount of recent botched landing attempts where some crews lack basic skills due to always using the automatics.

Why do passengers think we always make automatic landings ?
Weird.
joe two is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2018, 10:54
  #397 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,552
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by joe two
Why do passengers think we always make automatic landings ?
Weird.
Because that is often part of the spin put on our job by some in the media and some in management, who like to portray our job as being a doddle. Also, sadly because some of our colleagues who in the days of flight deck visits and now on social media like to tell everybody that their big toy is really "cool".

Ben_s:

Also good to see that Ryan policy allowed for manual flight, if that still the same now, one would hope so given the amount of recent botched landing attempts where some crews lack basic skills due to always using the automatics.
Just for Ben_s's benefit, and to give him some perspective I'll state that personally as a long haul pilot I always I don't think I've done an Autoland (outside of the simulator) in at least 5 years...I doubt many here routinely do autolands, regardless of the airline they work for .
wiggy is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2018, 10:57
  #398 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sudbury, Suffolk
Posts: 256
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by joe two



Why do passengers think we always make automatic landings ?
Weird.
...... because so many posts on this forum reflect the views of pilots who believe that flying skills have been degraded, or lost, by the continuous use of automatics through many phases of flight. I am sure you would not have to trawl too far to find a post saying "I used to insist on hand flying my approach but now Co.x discourage/forbid it"

Of course, the degradation of skills is only observable in other pilots.....
Maninthebar is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2018, 11:50
  #399 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Confusio Helvetica
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by joe two



Why do passengers think we always make automatic landings ?
Weird.
Well, on the A320, you can only hear the Cavalry Charge in rows 1-3, and even then, it goes against popular expectations. Those that hear the Cavalry Charge on final usually have it followed by a smooth landing -- "musta been Otto Pilot taking us in". On the other hand, those that hear the Cavalry Charge on rollout, usually went through some pea soup and are now looking for their teeth in the seatback following some hard braking, "Damn humans. Shoulda trusted the computer".
On other A/C types, the A/P disconnect sound is hardly audible from seat 1C, let alone the back of the cabin. Isn't it amazing what computers can do these days?.
DingerX is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2018, 12:03
  #400 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by calypso
Partly because at low power most of the birds will go just through the fan and at high power they will go through the hot section.
Why would that be ?
DaveReidUK is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.