Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Russia grounds some B737s

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Russia grounds some B737s

Old 26th Sep 2008, 01:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Russia grounds some B737s

Russia suspends Boeing 737 flights after crash
Pilots may need more training
Associated Press

Full article here
Published: 9/25/2008 2:03 PM
MOSCOW -- Russia's aviation authority has suspended flights of Boeing 737s until their pilots receive additional training after a recent deadly crash.

All 88 people aboard a Boeing 737-500 died when the plane operated by the Russian Aeroflot-Nord crashed Sept. 14 while preparing to land in the city of Perm in the Ural Mountains area.
weasil is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2008, 02:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Costa del Thames
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, the ADI on the -500 is no different from ADI's found on other 737's. However it's very different from ADI's found in various russian made airliners where the actual aeroplane symbol moves as opposed to the gyro itself.

Despite the sticky on top I would dare to say if this is the case, the crash (Perm) is most probably entitled to jet upset following a go-around. Furthermore, as an old Tu-154 pilot, and to further validate my point, the pilots of the ill-fated 737 where probably trained initially on older russian designs with tailmounted engines and not familiar/properly trained with the nose up momentum caused by underslung engines being firewalled in a go-around situation. With the stress of a go-around and unfamiliar handling caracteristics of the aeroplane and on top of that an instrument that doesn't look like/behave as you expect it to do, is a recipie for disaster.

Hardhat on
Brenoch is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2008, 04:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Speculation - but well informed speculation. A Flash Airlines 737 crashed off Sharm El Sheikh in 2004. The reasons were never properly determined but it was considered that it was a CFIT incident probably due to the captain misreading the ADI. He was an ex Egyptian Air Force Mig21 pilot and had been trained using Russian style AIs. Under stress, he may have reverted to type.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2008, 09:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: inside of a pretty bustard
Age: 53
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will agree all pilots to be assessed in simulators by SFI/SFE coming from other airlines what do yo say?
airman13 is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2008, 10:09
  #5 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 90
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brenoch

I agree entirely with you speculation about what probably happened.

However for the benefit of those pilots who may not have flown both types of attititude indication I am not sure about your description of the differences.

Gyros are gyros and have the same characteristics in both types of instrument.

What is different is that in the Russian type of display the aircraft symbol is mechanised to move in roll but is fixed in pitch with the pitch display moving behind it. As opposed to the 'western' totally fixed aircraft symbol where the roll and pitch indications are both arranged to move behind it.

A bit of a nit pick so no offence I hope

JF
John Farley is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2008, 12:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Costa del Thames
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
None whatsoever, well worded description of the russian-style ADI.

Thanks
Brenoch is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2008, 12:28
  #7 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,297
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Pictures are required: (this is actually from L-39 Albatros, Soviet bloc military jet trainer of choice)

Do not forget that Tu-154 would had been a 3 man cockpit (or even more). I disagree with the comment on crew's possible unfamiliarity to fly a go-around with adverse behaviour. It is not a mach tuck or dutch roll, irrespective of the way their training was conducted a manual go-around must had beencovered up to a proficient standard. The crew certainly knew how to perform a G/A, which of course does not explain why they did not (if that proves to be the case).
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2008, 12:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Around the lamp
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The transfer from eastern to western style ADI was a severe problem.

During the introduction of the Tu-154, there were a string of accidents of this type due to misreading of ADI. The problem at this time was, that the Tu-154 was the first (?) soviet aircraft with a western style ADI. In fact, the USSR want to export this a/c also, therefore they standardized the Cockpit to the west.

According to the swiss accident report of the Crossair Saab 340 near ZUR (where spatial disorentation of two former east block pilots in a western cockpit was also a contribution cause) in 2000, there were a dozen accidents.

I can just remember one, an Aeroflot Tu5 in the midst of the eighties in Uzbekistan (then part republic).

Regards,

Christian
Stubenfliege 2 is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2008, 13:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good write up on the Flash accident - and possible attitude confusion HERE.
forget is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2008, 16:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: btw SAMAR and TOSPA
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I read it, it was not a go around but a break-out from the approach pattern. As it appears radar vectors were used/commanded, wouldn't the approach pattern be flown in heading mode of the autopilot?

Why would that have been disengaged to break out? There may be more ground in the assumption that the power handling was not sufficient (autothrottle u/s) and the autopilot then disengaged itself.
threemiles is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2008, 19:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Do not forget that Tu-154 would had been a 3 man cockpit (or even more).
Aye. Things might have changed, but the TU-154 I was on in the early 90s actually had a five man crew: captain, first officer, flight engineer, radioman and navigator. The cockpit was spacious enough to accommodate not only them, but a gallery of spectators at the back!
Carbon Bootprint is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.