Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

CAL 744 in hard landing at DPS after turbulence

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

CAL 744 in hard landing at DPS after turbulence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 01:53
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: timbuktu
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
10,000'.......or 200?

Macau Daily Times - 30 hurt in turbulence on China Airlines flight says airline

30 injured because of clear-air-turbulence - Taiwan News Online

Both report an "up and down motion" of 200' or 60m lasting about 10 seconds.

Seat belts lights on as crew had already detected turbulence on radar.
marchino61 is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 02:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: asia
Age: 51
Posts: 175
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Vonkluffen and ACMS as well, true CAT is not that common in that area, however large CB's and TS certainly are! Only takes a few moments of inattention and ' WHACK ' ( so I'm told ;-) ) . Be careful out there!

Buggs
buggaluggs is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 03:40
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Seat belts lights on as crew had already detected turbulence on radar"

can someone tell me how do you detect CAT on your radar?
domani is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 03:51
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
You can't see CLEAR air turb.

They must have seen water drop intensity colours and interpreted their radar accordingly.
ACMS is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2008, 21:03
  #25 (permalink)  
epc
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would any pilot cover up the windshield with newspaper or meal tray??? What's the point of doing this?
epc is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2008, 22:57
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Moved beyond
Posts: 1,173
Received 84 Likes on 49 Posts
According to newspaper reports CAL has just done it again on a flight from HKG to BKK. Several pax and crew injured. I find it hard to believe it was CAT. As others have said, it's far more likely they flew through the top of a CB.
BuzzBox is online now  
Old 4th Oct 2008, 06:05
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South of Watford
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
epc

The newspaper is there to stop rays from the sun damaging delicate skin and eyes
Sir Richard is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2008, 10:09
  #28 (permalink)  
epc
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
covering up the window

I'm not a pilot. It seems a really unsafe thing to do to cover the windshields. Are the Boings and Airbuses and traffic control now so advanced now as to render the eyes irrelevant in flying?
epc is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2008, 10:27
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Moved beyond
Posts: 1,173
Received 84 Likes on 49 Posts
Absolutely not!!
BuzzBox is online now  
Old 4th Oct 2008, 14:46
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seat belts lights on as crew had already detected turbulence on radar
I believe the majority of these "unexpected" turbulence encounters are not real CAT at all but the crew have flown through a CB top. No way are they going to admit to inattention to the tilt or gain controls or they were failing to operate the radar correctly. Mysterious sudden CAT encounter covers a lot of sins and no one can prove otherwise.
A37575 is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2008, 20:27
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fareham UK
Age: 77
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slats One, are you sure about the "scheduled service" flight home of the VC10? I flew with David (Flash) Philips, the Captain of the Andes upset flight, many times in later years on the DC10, and I believe he told me the aeroplane was patched up, but empty-ferried home to LGW where the true extent of the damage was then discovered.
Michael
michaelmarsh is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.