Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Indian DGCA at it Again..

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Indian DGCA at it Again..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jun 2008, 13:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delhi
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indian DGCA at it Again..

Look at what the DGCA now proposes to do

http://www.moneycontrol.com/india/ne...-/17/31/343215.


Comments invited pls
teghjeet is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 13:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: eire
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like the most sensible thing the DGCA has recently proposed.
The Sandman is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 13:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks entirely reasonable to me.
411A is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 14:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MAN
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Entirely sensible
cldrvr is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 14:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cheshire
Age: 78
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face run that by me again . . . . . . .

Is this really PPrune ? With all the agreement displayed just above here there must be doubt !

But is it really sensible ? Is it really reasonable ?

A co pilot will need at least 4000 hours of flying of which 2000 hours should be jet experience
How many F/O's on UK charter airlines would meet these requirements ?
I know many Boeing and Airbus F/O's with well under 1000 hours total time, and even less on the jet types. Many UK charter companies are considering their guys for command courses when they get as far as 4000 hours.

Where and how will future Indian F/O's get the experience it seems they are going to need ?
AMEandPPL is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 14:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ---
Posts: 282
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..now this must create a shortage on experienced co-pilots.. interested to see how that develops!
ray cosmic is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 14:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 60
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the latest market forecasts on airline futures could be that a few experienced captains might be glad of one of those jobs to carry them over !
rmac is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 15:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Tis all very simple.
Indian First Officers would be restricted to routes within India, when they accumulated the requisite flying hours, they would then be available for international flying.
In the meantime, ex-pat First Officers would be recruited, with the required flying hours/experience, to operate international sectors, in the meantime.
Of course, these ex-pat F/O's would be paid a premimum over their Indian counterparts...and the inland revenue authorities in India would thus collect larger tax revenues.

Everybody wins!
411A is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 15:33
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GMT
Posts: 65
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Nothing surprises... they waste all their time coming up with illogical "rules" and finally lose the battle in the courts... earlier example is the FDTL rules.

Most of these rules are engineered by the vested interests who have questionable reasons for trying to espouse this. Why don't they apply the same rules to international airlines coming into India?
Jazbag is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 15:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: still trying to know
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone in India that can confirm it? Need something even almost official that could be used to comment better. Hope to receive an answer to this request, since newspapers all around the globe get their original sources and then comment according to their particular interests. Is it different in India?

Agreeing with 411A, low timers would fly inside India, and experienced ones the international sectors, then showing a better image to ICAO and other counterparts. You know, you can do as a national regulatory body whatever you like inside your country, but not internationally.
kwick is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 16:37
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds great,150hrs cadets should gain some idea of line flying on turbo-props etc and slowly move up to larger aircraft.Would you want to know that your f/o has only 150hrs,some i have meet cant take the weather down correctly.
tom booze is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 16:39
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Except they are also banning ex-pats from operating Indian aircraft. Quickly resulting therefore in pilot shortages, and the continued dominance of legacy, state-owned airlines over more efficient private enterprise.

Now that is not the result that you would have preferred is it now, 411A. Bloated state carriers over efficient private carriers?


As pointed out by many before, 200hr cadets have operated very safely for many years in a huge variety of airlines, from BOAC/BA and Cathay to easyJet and Air France - KLM, all safely gaining extensive operating experience in large jets from day 1, with excellent training behind them and excellent colleagues from whom to learn.

The problem occurs only when incapable, undertrained cadets are recruited, operating with inexperienced captains.
Re-Heat is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 17:24
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delhi
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why mandatory p2 1500hrs for P1

dont see any logic in that.

Especially if you read in context with

http://www.dgca.nic.in/circular/ops2_2008.pdf

That means no cpt will want to move to widebody bcoz it means 1500 hrs as p2....
teghjeet is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 21:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: planet earth
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Typical, nothing will ever change in India.
sevenforeseven is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 05:21
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delhi
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Matter closed...

Hi,

This is the latest news on the widebody requirements.



Airlines win pilot battle
teghjeet is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 05:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indian DGCA

Since when did anyone have an ATPL with 150hrs? 150hrs min to 4000hrs?? What are they talking about, It s a bit early in the morning here but i seem to be missing everything!
Captain Wonderful is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 06:07
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: negative RAIM.....
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The is nothing wrong with seemingly low time pilots getting into the seat of jets IF the training systems, protocols and culture exists within the airline. Singapore Airlines and CX have done it well and continue to do so. Pilots not making the grade are scrubbed, as it should be.

In India, this is definitely NOT the case. Book smart, yes, but from my experience with their national carrier the flying skils are just not there.

Whatever the DGCA proposes now or in the future will only ever be a smoke screen for the real truth. Exemptions to every rule are made due "operation needs" or plain old fashioned corruption and bribery, which again is more than ripe and systemic to getting anything done in that country.

Expats? No, not the answer. They / we are not wanted and treated with distain at every turn. Most of those I know still there are looking to get out purely due to the way things are done, how they are treated and the pure ignorance to any form of professional standards.

Until some serious cultural change in Indian airlines occurs, there lies more CAT ahead....
TopTup is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 06:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mars
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Finally..

Good for DGCA. Most pilots on the Kingfisher widebody are totally inexperienced on the International routes....let alone, not sure they would even pass a level 4 English. Mallya and his clowns around him, turned this airline into a CIRCUS AIRLINES. His BIG ego is going to kill this airline...just wait and see. Within a year of start of International....All his routes are covered..there is NO true demand for seats....Just total EGO trip. ONLY thing will be to SELL or SHUTDOWN this cash loosing cow.

Ground: Kingfisher 000, gate 5, request push and start for San Fran...TOTAL SOB on board: 135...
Kingfisher320 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 08:05
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GMT
Posts: 65
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
As DGCA is trying to become JAR compliant it needs to leave the responsibility of deciding who does and doesnt fly wide body to the airlines and the assessors in the airlines,

Nobody is going to give such an expensive aircraft into the hands of an incompetent....

After that if the assessors of the airline feel that such person needs more training than they are free to make him fly any amount as co pilot.

KF 320 seems to have got his a@@@@ taken some time..

Fly safe
Jazbag is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.