Garuda again !!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: NSW,Australia
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Garuda again !!
From Crikey.com.au
Garuda almosts land on airport workers. Will Rudd demand answers?
Ben Sandilands writes:
An alarming incident at Perth Airport involving a Garuda Indonesia 737, more than 100 predominantly Australian passengers and a construction crew working on a closed section of a runway last Friday has come to light.
The flight from Denpasar was about to land when the pilots queried why they could see vehicles and machinery at the end of the runway and began a go-around.
Perth tower is understood to have been doubly surprised.
Not only had Garuda and all other airlines using the airport been issued with a special notification of the work, which instructed them to use a displaced threshold, meaning land further down the runway than normal, but a copy of these instructions had been transmitted to the flight as it approached Perth.
Make that a triple surprise. The Garuda flight then lined for another landing on the runway and appeared at imminent risk of touching down right on top of the work site.
The tower ordered the Indonesians to abort the landing approach and go around again, but they kept coming, levelling off at the last moment to skim over the obstacles and then land safely on the remainder of the runway.
A major investigation has been launched by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. It is certain to ask whether or not the original notification to all pilots was clearly written (which Crikey understands that it was), whether Garuda’s operations division actually read and acted upon the notification, whether its pilots paid any attention to the electronic copy of the notification sent to their flight, and whether they understood the urgent advice from the tower to discontinue their landing approach and what factors might have made them ignore its directive.
This is a serious matter. While the ATSB only deals with the technical aspects of incidents with a view to furthering aviation safety, there is a political dimension which PM Rudd, as leader of the opposition, grasped in the aftermath of the 7 March, 2007 atrocity in which another Garuda 737 crash landed at Yogyakarta Airport which killed two AFP security officers, two Australian government employees, one journalist, 17 other passengers and left dozens injured or crippled among the 118 survivors.
That Garuda jet was still a smoking ruin when Rudd called for criminal sanctions against the pilots involved, who tried to land it on a short runway at twice the normal speed.
Subject to the findings of the investigation, what will the PM do about the antics of Garuda (which is responsible for the competency of its pilots) at an Australian airport?
Or does being in government make it all too hard to demand answers and actions?
Send your tips to [email protected], submit them anonymously here or SMS tips and photos to 0427 TIP OFF.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 60
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have to agree with you totally about the risks of flying Garuda, used them a lot when I worked in Indonesia.
What concerns me most about your mail though, is my surprise at how many communications systems (last two lines of your post) Oz has in place to encourage people to inform on their neighbours and mates
What concerns me most about your mail though, is my surprise at how many communications systems (last two lines of your post) Oz has in place to encourage people to inform on their neighbours and mates
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A lot of the lazy jouno's in Oz rely on the general public to do their leg work. They sit at a keyboard and blog then call it journalism. Unfortunately the Big Brother mentality ensures that there is no shortage of people trying to get their 15 minutes of fame.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In what context is that?
What does the comment on a journo have to do with what has been said? Crikey is usually good on new aviation info. Comment on the substance, not the fact that a e-zine or journalist published it. Is it factual, and it looks like it is.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What concerns me most about your mail though, is my surprise at how many communications systems (last two lines of your post) Oz has in place to encourage people to inform on their neighbours and mates
Guest
Posts: n/a
Don't know any more than what's posted here but this sort of thing - aircraft trying to land on WIP short of a temporary displaced threshold - has happened many times and the world over. Whatever the reasons, clearly it is all too easy to do.
In these days of safety management, maybe it's time to close runways when there is work going on.....not that that is any cast iron guarantee that no-one will try to take-off or land on it, I know, but at least it reduces some of the risk.
In these days of safety management, maybe it's time to close runways when there is work going on.....not that that is any cast iron guarantee that no-one will try to take-off or land on it, I know, but at least it reduces some of the risk.
100 predominantly Australian passengers
How is it that they are banned from the EU but still allowed to fly to Australia?
After spending some time in Indonesia and seeing the operations of Merpati a few years ago I would never get on an Indonesian airliner.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to agree with previous posts about Indonesian operators. The worst thunder storm I experienced during thirteen years in SE ASia was one afternoon in Jakarta.Most days the worst cb's seemed to lurk over the high gound to the South of the field, but on this occasion they drifted over the top. Despite 1000mts. in heavy TS, with windshear, and multiple lightening strikes, on the airfield,including our aerobridge, Mepati and Garuda just kept on trucking. I don't know if its commercial pressure or just a lack of imagination.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 1°21'10.20"N - 103°56'36.21"E
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bad weather ..
just a 2 cent of my experience in asia ..
when I was in india once, despite the horrible weather, the airlines were flying.. and we had some nasty air pockets.
one of my colleagues, a british commented that they should stop flying if the weather is bad, instead of subjecting passengers through the roller coaster rides.
An indian Railway engineer seated next to us casually commented - "if we stop operating in bad weather, we will never have flights in this part of the world for half the year, and secondly, in Europe cancellation will inconvenience a few thousand people, while in Asia, cancellations will create a domino effect running into 10 times or 100 times stranded passenger, compared to Europe.
And same goes for the train services in India. Apparently, even when there is severe storm, they prefer to operate, even at slower pace, and keep stopping when the floods are overflowing bridges and such, than cancel trains and strand many more thousands, just from one day of cancellations.
Not every country has the luxury of hiding under covers when it rains, I guess.
Coming to Garuda, while aussies have a serious love hate affair with Indonesia, (including the public roar in Aussie for the Bali Nine) Garuda is not as horrible as the picture being painted. Maybe an Aussie can tell why Aussies hate indonesia, but still insist on partying and holidaying in Indonesia.
GA maintenance and training is supposed to be top notch, though you have slips when you are forced to fly and keep the country alive, rather than run for covers when it seems to be bad WX. It is far far from Adam air and such, in terms of MX and pilots.
Maybe one of the Indonesian experts can enlighten all of us
I gotta agree though you do get a few rotten apples here and there, maybe those in GA get caught more often ...
Got to run for cover now...
Over and out
when I was in india once, despite the horrible weather, the airlines were flying.. and we had some nasty air pockets.
one of my colleagues, a british commented that they should stop flying if the weather is bad, instead of subjecting passengers through the roller coaster rides.
An indian Railway engineer seated next to us casually commented - "if we stop operating in bad weather, we will never have flights in this part of the world for half the year, and secondly, in Europe cancellation will inconvenience a few thousand people, while in Asia, cancellations will create a domino effect running into 10 times or 100 times stranded passenger, compared to Europe.
And same goes for the train services in India. Apparently, even when there is severe storm, they prefer to operate, even at slower pace, and keep stopping when the floods are overflowing bridges and such, than cancel trains and strand many more thousands, just from one day of cancellations.
Not every country has the luxury of hiding under covers when it rains, I guess.
Coming to Garuda, while aussies have a serious love hate affair with Indonesia, (including the public roar in Aussie for the Bali Nine) Garuda is not as horrible as the picture being painted. Maybe an Aussie can tell why Aussies hate indonesia, but still insist on partying and holidaying in Indonesia.
GA maintenance and training is supposed to be top notch, though you have slips when you are forced to fly and keep the country alive, rather than run for covers when it seems to be bad WX. It is far far from Adam air and such, in terms of MX and pilots.
Maybe one of the Indonesian experts can enlighten all of us
I gotta agree though you do get a few rotten apples here and there, maybe those in GA get caught more often ...
Got to run for cover now...
Over and out
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lost, but often Indonesia
Posts: 652
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Garuda
I've been flying with Garuda for years and think they're the best of the lot when it comes to Indonesian Airlines. Maybe others would have landed regardless?
Prof. Airport Engineer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Australia (mostly)
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leaving aside the jokes, I’ve got some work coming up at an airport with a shortened runway where this same sort of problem can be expected to occur (no prizes for guessing which continent).
I hadn’t given it much thought up until now but this thread has prompted me to look to other, more positive, ways of handling the problem. What about setting up one of the lighting towers, aimed up at aircraft on finals, and having the generator engine ticking over all night, with a worker ready to flick the switch on. At first I was thinking to be sarcastic and say the worker is probably redundant, since it would only need the safety officer (who is always listening out on the radio) to position himself close to the switch when certain airlines approach, but that is nonsense. Genuine mistakes happen and to respected operators. The safety officer and workers genuinely see well beforehand if an aircraft is going to land on them, and they can switch the lights on if it is looking too close. Wouldn’t want too many false alarms though.
I hadn’t given it much thought up until now but this thread has prompted me to look to other, more positive, ways of handling the problem. What about setting up one of the lighting towers, aimed up at aircraft on finals, and having the generator engine ticking over all night, with a worker ready to flick the switch on. At first I was thinking to be sarcastic and say the worker is probably redundant, since it would only need the safety officer (who is always listening out on the radio) to position himself close to the switch when certain airlines approach, but that is nonsense. Genuine mistakes happen and to respected operators. The safety officer and workers genuinely see well beforehand if an aircraft is going to land on them, and they can switch the lights on if it is looking too close. Wouldn’t want too many false alarms though.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somewhere in the Tropics UTC+7 to 9
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am extremely disappointed to find out this serious incident happend.
I called a colleague at the NTSC and he didn't know if the ATSB has informed the NTSC of the incident or not.
If the pilot was not informed of the NOTAM, then this would not be the first time for Garuda (remember the missile testing in India last year?). The biggest concern is, what part of the "displaced threshold landing clearance" don't they understand?
I find it sad I had to ask a friend at PER airport to verify the incident.
We'll see how it's gonna go.
As good as Garuda's training goes, still need to find out how the heck this incident happened. It is rather disturbing that despite the best maintenance and training and working conditions amongst the airlines in the country, Garuda's incidents (and accidents) seem to have a higher proportion of human factor causality than the competitors...
PK-KAR
I called a colleague at the NTSC and he didn't know if the ATSB has informed the NTSC of the incident or not.
If the pilot was not informed of the NOTAM, then this would not be the first time for Garuda (remember the missile testing in India last year?). The biggest concern is, what part of the "displaced threshold landing clearance" don't they understand?
I find it sad I had to ask a friend at PER airport to verify the incident.
We'll see how it's gonna go.
As good as Garuda's training goes, still need to find out how the heck this incident happened. It is rather disturbing that despite the best maintenance and training and working conditions amongst the airlines in the country, Garuda's incidents (and accidents) seem to have a higher proportion of human factor causality than the competitors...
PK-KAR
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ECUREILIX...........I take your point about seasonal weather in India, but there is a big difference between the continuous bad weather conditions of the Indian monsoon, and a passing severe thunderstorm in SE Asia. The thunderstorms in the region rarely last more than 30 minutes, so why compromise safety by pressing on into known bad weather and windshear when a small delay means cavok. If you don't believe me compare the safety records of the airlines in the region, and you will soon see that although they all fly in similar weather environments, some have a markedly better safety record when it comes to weather related incidents.
^^^ In answer to your earlier post's question, while no expert on Indonesians, I did live there for four years and am married to one...
In general, and yes, generalisations are very dangerous, but there is usually some truth in them, it seems to be the case that if something has not happened previously to an Indonesian, they don't see that it could. Hence they cram 5 people on a motorcycle and weave through the traffic to see Granny on a Sunday (along with 10m others in Jakarta!). I watched a guy on a tower crane on a building site over Jl Sudirman clamber along the arm and start bashing a recalicitrant bit of machinery with a hammer, no apparant safety equipment other than hanging on manually. I have seen roadworkers swinging pickaxes and shovels while wearing flipflops. Amazing place.
As to why they are flying through thunderstorms, Indonesia is still largely a society where you do what your boss says.
In general, and yes, generalisations are very dangerous, but there is usually some truth in them, it seems to be the case that if something has not happened previously to an Indonesian, they don't see that it could. Hence they cram 5 people on a motorcycle and weave through the traffic to see Granny on a Sunday (along with 10m others in Jakarta!). I watched a guy on a tower crane on a building site over Jl Sudirman clamber along the arm and start bashing a recalicitrant bit of machinery with a hammer, no apparant safety equipment other than hanging on manually. I have seen roadworkers swinging pickaxes and shovels while wearing flipflops. Amazing place.
As to why they are flying through thunderstorms, Indonesia is still largely a society where you do what your boss says.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Melbourne, China
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hence they cram 5 people on a motorcycle and weave through the traffic to see Granny on a Sunday (along with 10m others in Jakarta!). I watched a guy on a tower crane on a building site over Jl Sudirman clamber along the arm and start bashing a recalicitrant bit of machinery with a hammer, no apparant safety equipment other than hanging on manually. I have seen roadworkers swinging pickaxes and shovels while wearing flipflops.
.. anyway, back to this incident. The fact that they came in for another approach with a similar profile as the one before would suggest that the pilot was locked on to the ILS? If so, then this is more of a case of poor (or lack of) manual flying skills than just not reading or understanding the NOTAMs. Just my dua rupiah's worth.
PPRuNe Handmaiden
Why not use the same lighting as suggested here
If the link doesn't work and I suspect it won't, the one with the red "NOT HERE" and the green "HERE" flashing lights.
I was right, it won't work.
If the link doesn't work and I suspect it won't, the one with the red "NOT HERE" and the green "HERE" flashing lights.
I was right, it won't work.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oop North
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't they have IOSA accreditation: http://www.iata.org/ps/certification/iosa/
