Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

BMJ article - Security Screening Effectiveness Needs To Be Investigated

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

BMJ article - Security Screening Effectiveness Needs To Be Investigated

Old 23rd Dec 2007, 10:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BMJ article - Security Screening Effectiveness Needs To Be Investigated

Every year the British Medical Journal publishes a christmas edition containing humorous, not entirely serious, and/or particularly topical articles.
This year it includes a suggestion for an experimental investigation of airport screening effectiveness.

Screening programme evaluation applied to airport security

Essentially the suggestion is to use the techniques that would normally be used to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness (i.e. a clinical trial) to investigate airport screening.

Whether the particular study they have suggested would be practical or sensible this article does draw attention to some important issues.

In particular, the authors have looked at the scientific literature and found...

"...no comprehensive studies that evaluated the effectiveness of x ray screening of passengers or hand luggage, screening with metal detectors, or screening to detect explosives."
stagger is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2007, 14:07
  #2 (permalink)  
LH2
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Abroad
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course, we are not proposing that money spent on unconfirmed but politically comforting efforts to identify and seize water bottles and skin moisturisers should be diverted to research on cancer or malaria vaccines
God forbid!!

After all, I would much rather see myself or a member of my family die of cancer than blown up in an aircraft... or would I?
LH2 is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2007, 23:02
  #3 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BALPA are publishing a report on how to conduct minimally invasive cardiac surgery next week, I hear...
Apparently the first line reads,

"This procedure is only to be carried out on people who actually require surgery, not the heart surgeon."
Human Factor is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2007, 00:41
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Before people perhaps get carried away discussing the appropriateness of this sort of topic being addressed in a medical journal - can I reiterate that this appears in the Christmas issue of the BMJ which by tradition contains an "eclectic collection of amusing satire, unfamiliar perspectives, and the truly bizarre".

The article, although not entirely serious, does raise some important issues about security screening (e.g. the lack of evidence for its effectiveness) by drawing parallels with medical practice.

Also note - the BMJ does offer a moderated "Rapid Response" mechanism if anyone has any comments. I'm sure contributions from aviation professionals would be welcome. There is a "Respond to this article" link on the page.
stagger is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.