Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Thomson A/C In flight shutdown

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Thomson A/C In flight shutdown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th May 2007, 14:41
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
1. There appeared to be no physical damage to the engine itself. Only a 25degree overheat which dictated an engine change.
I imangine there are going to be some interesting findings when they open the engine compressors up.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 9th May 2007, 16:27
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lineing up in a 757 on 24L this morning. As we were cleared for take off, bird van asked tower if he could do a run on 24L after our departure.He had just done 24R. I did think about not going for a second! Then again the other, light blue, 757 infront of us had probably done the job. Why did the van bother?
doubledolphins is offline  
Old 9th May 2007, 20:47
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You always need to be wary of loafing birds around an airport that a shooed away from one runway only to set down near another. It's pretty damn difficlut to move birds completely off an airfield in a single day. Runway activity is your friend, as the birds don't feel welcome. Inactivity for over 30 minutes when bird shooing is ongoing somewhere else on the airfield is your worst risk. There goes ONA at JFK where they asked to use an inactive runway and nobody cleared it beforehand. Other similar examples
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 9th May 2007, 23:18
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a curiosity, would the aircraft have been flown manually throughout or on autopilot until on final?
fonawah is offline  
Old 9th May 2007, 23:39
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In the real world
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try and check previous posts - page 4!!
DooblerChina is offline  
Old 10th May 2007, 07:31
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,249
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=206063
212man is online now  
Old 10th May 2007, 08:38
  #127 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For all (and Doobler) - PAGE references are user-pecific depending on how many posts are displayed per page (User CP/Edit options). It is best to refer to post number. I assume you mean Post#61?

To answer the question, most airlines encourage use of a/p whenever available to ease the workload, so probably yes, but it is always up to the crew.
BOAC is offline  
Old 10th May 2007, 13:13
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone said why did they call mayday so early?

I was involved in a bird strike at CWL a couple of years ago. 737 on dep hit a seagull in the starboard engine (i think) and called mayday very early on, maybe 50ft ish?

Its a good job they did, there was traffic which I was going to clear for takeoff as the crew called Mayday. As a result the departure was held and a runway inspection carried out. The runway inspection carried turned up several fan blades / parts of fan blades on the runway. They could have caused another equally difficult situation for the next a/c.
Turn It Off is offline  
Old 10th May 2007, 16:27
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting a call in to ATC early on has another side to it: Emergency Turn Procedures are company specific although at a guess, most companies have pretty similar ones because everyone is trying to avoid the same obstacles. On paper, ATC don't know what those procedures are so having aviated and navigated it would be a right bummer if you followed the ETP only to meet the Copper Chopper working just to the north of the centreline because everybody was expecting this chap to go south neatly avoided by having communicated! A good reason to listen out and build a situational awareness of where and what others are doing. Difficult in Spanish or French but that's another thread!
Any ATC comment on knowledge of ETPs?
As an irrelevant aside, both guys are fairly new in their respective seats I believe. Well done guys.
yeoman is offline  
Old 11th May 2007, 07:37
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATC comment on ETP

I would think that at airfields where some are present, ATC have been contacted by the airline and told what they are so it can be included in TRUCE etc??

I am not aware of any where I am, maybe a cardiff pilot might confirm whether they have an ETP?
Turn It Off is offline  
Old 11th May 2007, 09:16
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: 30 West
Age: 65
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No - our company uses e turns and hasn't spoken to anyone about it - most are ahead to 1500 agl then left or right back to the overhead fix
javelin is offline  
Old 11th May 2007, 09:53
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is not reasonable for ATC to know every company SOP.
But - if you say " callsign mayday standby", then we know that you have a problem , and we can start taking the appropriate actions , and wait for the crew to come back to us with what they intend to do.

louby
loubylou is offline  
Old 11th May 2007, 10:18
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice!

Are you cardiff based Javelin? If so will you pm me pls?

TIO
Turn It Off is offline  
Old 11th May 2007, 18:12
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems to me, that "Fam Flights" should be re-instated.....or am I jumping the gun...[again]
bb
wiccan is offline  
Old 12th May 2007, 09:16
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: LIVERPOOL
Age: 71
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello everyone-I'm NOT a pilot-I'm one of those people that sit behind you and pay your wages-YES a dreaded member of the public.
I'm also a nervous flyer (had my first flight since 1982 the otherday)-and I just wonder if you guys ever think how an event like this affects the general public.
My pet fear about flying is loss of power on take off-I am literally cacking it when we roll down that runway-'What happens if the engine fails now-jeez we'll just fall out of the sky, and we're not high enough for the pilot to recover'-I think these are quite common thoughts of the ignorant passenger.
This incident, although it reflects my pet fear in real life, has gone a long way to ease my fears.
I realise that
1. A big jet can take off and climb on one engine.
2. The crew remain calm and in control of the situation
3. The bloody thing can land ok on one engine
I probably still be cacking it going down the runway-but not as much
Take care.
martinj2 is offline  
Old 12th May 2007, 10:46
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doubledolphins

"Lineing up in a 757 on 24L this morning. As we were cleared for take off, bird van asked tower if he could do a run on 24L after our departure.He had just done 24R. I did think about not going for a second! Then again the other, light blue, 757 infront of us had probably done the job. Why did the van bother?"

I presume you are refering to the ops vehicle 'Scarecrow. Whilst not employed by the airport, I am given to understand that runways checks are performed by various operations personnel using callsigns 'Checker', 'Ops' and 'Scarecrow'. The fact that the 'run' was being undertaken by 'Scarecrow' does not necessarily mean that it was a birdscaring exercise and it was in fact more likely to have been a routine runway surface inspection.

Hope this helps.

Scottie Dog
Scottie Dog is offline  
Old 12th May 2007, 13:41
  #137 (permalink)  

Forewarned is Forearmed
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: uk
Age: 60
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scottie Dog : Sadly Aircraft don't scare birds that well, sometimes we check the runway towards the end of a patrol before changing over, as an additional surface inspection or indeed in case some bird/s are not clearly visible from the normal patrol route.
Ranger 1 is offline  
Old 20th May 2007, 07:15
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was squawk 7700 used?
fonawah is offline  
Old 20th May 2007, 10:55
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bournemouth UK
Age: 49
Posts: 862
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, watch the second video and you'll hear them being asked to squawk 7700.
Sky Wave is offline  
Old 22nd May 2007, 01:00
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: london
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cargo Boy,
the guys did exactly what they are told on TOM opc/lpc, whith regards to ATC comms.


After the airplane is under control (it was) and it is not going to hit anything (it wasn't), transmit a mayday call. If there is no emergency turn, tell them your are going straight ahead (ie. not following the sid). If there is an emergency turn, just give atc a rough idea of what you are going to do. Keep it brief. Thats exactly what they did. If you have any further objections to that, take it with the Tfly training department.


The 45 minutes in the air that some of you find too much, were not to reduce the aircraft weight. In the old days, having an engine failure on take off and landing within 9 minutes, was an indication of job very well done. In the CRM era we live, the pilots must be more methodical and don't rush. After all, these airplanes are certified to fly on one engine for 3 hours! I am not suggesting un-necessary delayed landing. But what is necessary, is to perform all the normal and non-normal checklists methodically. That includes the QRH, the after take-off checklist, the diversion checklist, the overweight landing checklist, the approach checklist etc. Also you need to decide where you are going to go, your landing performance and to brief the cabin crew and to speak/reassure the punters. That's what we are taught and we are checked to meet that. Obviously, if the situation involves uncontrolled fire, smoke etc, is a different ball game.


The only comment about this star performance would be the way the fire crews approached the aircraft. They seemed happy to walk slowly past the sides of the tires (danger area). Their job was to check possible tire/brake overheat or any other smoke source. It seems their curiosity to see what went wrong overwelmed them and they had to have a good look inside the engine as well.

Regards, Gonso
gonso is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.