Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Delta 767 EGCC 09/12/06 Gear Trouble?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Delta 767 EGCC 09/12/06 Gear Trouble?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Dec 2006, 19:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Delta 767 EGCC 09/12/06 Gear Trouble?

I was on the departure end of runway 1 at about 12:30pm Saturday 9th an EGCC and saw a Delta 767 depart and not retract its left MLG. It appeared to climb fairly slowly (I estimated to about 5000ft) and make a right hand turn to fly back toward the airfield.

I watched it for as long as I could I'd guess 7-8 mins and in all that time I never did see that left gear go away, but neither did I hear anything of it, or see it return to the airfield.

Can anyone shed any light on what happened, or where it went?

What are the SOPs (obviously they differ airline to airline) for this sort of problem?

Regards,
BigHitDH is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 19:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will not be the one saying that BA's sops would call for them to fly to destination with the one gear down. ;-)

I imagine that the gear pin was left in the gear and that the plane will reduce weight (dumping and just flying around burning off fuel...only a few of the earlier 767's can't dump fuel) and then put all the gear down and land.
jondc9 is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 20:00
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ooops

Hmm, I thought the crew had to have all the gear pins in the cockpit before doors shut as part of their checks?
BigHitDH is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 20:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink Delta 767

In regards to the Delta that departed and was unable to retract his left wheel:

I was working on sector that morning and he did infact level off at 6000ft for around 30 miles north of Manchester to allow him to try and rectify the situation.

However after many minutes of trying he requested to divert to Gatwick (this being the reason you never seen him return to Manchester). He did infact fly all the way to Gatwick at 6000ft.

I bet everyone with a window seat got a good view!!
captainlj is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 21:06
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Captainlj

Many thanks for that answer!
BigHitDH is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2006, 03:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
big hit

yes, the pins are supposed to be in the cockpit...but mistakes do happen.

now, I don't know for a FACT that was the reason the left gear didn't retract...there might have been another reason, or multiple reasons.

there is an old joke stateside about an arrogant delta pilot followed by another airline...arrogance abounded by the delta, and the following less arrogant pilot finally mentioned that since DELTA LOVED TO FLY AND IT SHOWS...it might be wise to remove the gear pin before it showed how stupid they were.

amazingly enough, if you takeoff and can't retract the gear and simultaneously lose an engine...you have real problems.

one might call the CAA people at gatwick to find out the whole story.
jondc9 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2006, 10:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: LAS
Age: 58
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its was Ship 1504. and as stated they diverted to LGW
The flight was also a line check (checkride) for the captain!! Makes it fun!
I highly DOUBT its the grear pins...probably hear about it soon.
I wonder why he didnt return to MAN? Perhaps to burn fuel to reach a landing weight instead of dumping?
V1uhoh is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2006, 11:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
v1uhoh (great name by the way)

if it was the gear pins, the check airman might have been doing the walk around...ouch!

of course it may have been many other things than the gear pins...I do hope someone close to this will keep us informed.

I can imagine the problem would be easier to repair at gatwick?
jondc9 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2006, 11:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would think he would burn plenty at 6000 feet with gear down also maybe his maintenance wanted him there as they have a big operation at Gatwick

G-I-B
GOLF-INDIA BRAVO is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2006, 14:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: netherlands
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello,

A/C went to LGW and needed an overweight landing check.
They followed the FIM and found the left gear position actuator at fault.
Replaced and now all ok.
This actuator will tilt the gear in position for retraction.

regards VvG
vincent van gogh is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2006, 14:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And did the Captain pass his line check?
Vampy is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2006, 17:51
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by captainlj
He did infact fly all the way to Gatwick at 6000ft.

I bet everyone with a window seat got a good view!!
He actually didn't, more like FL90/9000 down to Gatwick. He was on a Pole Hill and asked to maintain 5000, then requested climb to 6000. Once they decided to go to LGW (without fuel dumping) they were given a radar heading back southbound and cleared up to FL90 for the trip to LGW.

Still a good view though.

BAe 146
BAe 146-100 is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2006, 10:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

from memory the tilt actuator tilts the gear to 17 degrees and only after the pseu see"s the gear tilted will it allow to retract. two tilt switchs,strange a tilt actuator failure ,unless a remove/install carried out and no bleed of the system,probably find a tilt switch failure
chemical alli is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2006, 10:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't think a 767 could dump fuel

louby
loubylou is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2006, 11:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by loubylou
Didn't think a 767 could dump fuel
louby
My understanding is that some can.
matkat is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2006, 11:25
  #16 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Longer than I care to admit, I had two incidents operating on a CV880 when a nose gear failed to retract after take off and another one when the left main gear failed to retract. Both incidents resulted in return and were due to linkage failures.
HotDog is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2006, 11:41
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Besides the engineering considerations, and as all safety aspects were covered, it is also obviously better to get the pax to a point where there are the best opportunities to reroute them on to their destinations same day, and London is going to offer much better opportunities for this than Manchester.
WHBM is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2006, 12:07
  #18 (permalink)  
Plumbum Pendular
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Avionics Bay
Age: 55
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, I thought the crew had to have all the gear pins in the cockpit before doors shut as part of their checks?
This is the sort of ignorant "pre guessing" that really is starting to irritate me about Pprune.

Of the many many reasons that a MLG would not retract why do you instantly imply that it was because a gear pin was left in?
fmgc is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2006, 15:10
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The -300 has fuel jettison. Unsure if this is standard or an option. Dumps from Centre tank only at @ 1100 kg/min. With 37.0T in the (full) wings and a typical ZFM of 120.0 that would leave you over MLM of 145,149 kg, probably even after a low level / high drag transit to LGW. I'm assuming that DL would have had > full wings for a run to Whereverville USA. The LDA at LGW is considerably shorter than MAN but is still long enough at MLM.

The Truck Tilt forms part of the Air Ground Logic and, as stated previously, prevents gear retraction if inop.

Would probably have been good to have a 3rd brain in the Checker - use of resources etc (rather than the 1/3rd brain of the pin theorist).
yeoman is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2006, 18:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of the many many reasons that a MLG would not retract why do you instantly imply that it was because a gear pin was left in?
It happens.... we had a B777 RTF last week due to main gear not retracting, cause found to be gear pins!

Mutt
mutt is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.