Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

QANTAS / BA Flight hits JFK blast fence

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

QANTAS / BA Flight hits JFK blast fence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th May 2006, 23:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: age (It's French for cheese. This made sense when it said From and not Location)
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QANTAS Flight hits JFK blast fence

In the BA lounge at JFK, lots of Aussies being told to pick up their bags as their incoming aircraft hit a blast fence on the taxi in. Anyone care to fill in some details, they say at least 24 hours to repair.
Not a journo, just a passenger with an interest in aviation waiting in the lounge wondering what the damage was.

Last edited by VivaTheBeaver; 31st May 2006 at 21:32.
VivaTheBeaver is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 04:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MASP

From The Sydney Morning Herald, online:

"Qantas jet hits airport blast fence
Debbie Cuthbertson
May 30, 2006 - 11:33AM

A Qantas plane has hit a fence at New York's JFK airport.

A spokesman for the airline has confirmed that the wing tip of a Qantas aircraft hit a blast fence at the airport last night.

He said the aircraft was taxiing on the runway after landing at JFK about 5pm New York time (7am AEST).

Qantas is expected to release to a statement about the incident."
MASP is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 04:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MASP

Just posted, a similar report (below) from The Australian, online. (The time lag in reporting seem unusual):
"Qantas jet damaged in NY
By staff writers
May 30, 2006
A QANTAS jet clipped a fence after arriving at New York's John F Kennedy International Airport today, authorities said.
AP reports that no one was hurt, and the plane was not significantly damaged.
The plane had flown in from Los Angeles and hit the fence as it was heading for a terminal.
AP said the plane landed safely about 5.30pm (0830 AEST), according to Tony Ciavolella, a spokesman for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which operates the region's airports.
Passengers were reportedly held up for only a few minutes after the accident and then disembarked."
MASP is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 05:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
S erves them right.Why cant they find their own terminal at JFK instead of clogging up the stands that BA use
frangatang is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 06:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because Frangatang, BA get a lot of lucrative money by handeling Qantas at the terminal and as they are both oneworld carriers it makes sense for them to be together.
apaddyinuk is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 07:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: sydney. australia
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty tough Franga..3 services a week..2 hour transit..and I'm sure BA do pretty well from the deal!
qfcabin is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 07:03
  #7 (permalink)  
VH-GRUMPY
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Also because BA used to be a shareholder in Qantas - they sold out only last year I think.
 
Old 30th May 2006, 07:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Endor
Age: 83
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wingtip schwingtip. It doesn't matter much, its just money and a new or repaired wingtip.
YesTAM is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 07:38
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manoeuvring a large aircraft around on the ground at JFK is quite challenging in general with narrow-ish taxiways and numerous 90deg turns. In the BA terminal 7 area there are also nearby obstacles and quite specific stand entry requirements to reduce the risk on hitting anything with your wingtip/outboard engine. Great concentration is required and it's always a relief to shutdown/take off. Aircraft have clouted things there before and will again, this was probably a first for Qantas though.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 09:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 411
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I have to agree with TopBunk. Taxiing a B744 around the cycle track width taxiways in JFK is always a challenge. It is amazing that there are not more incidents like this. Manoeuvering the A380 is going to be even more exciting.
Fly3 is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 09:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The West
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try an A340-600......................
islandhopper is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 13:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by frangatang
S erves them right.Why cant they find their own terminal at JFK instead of clogging up the stands that BA use
Now... where was that cranium-retract lever...
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 17:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,539
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
They will still be able to repair this faster than they will the new all plastic 787 super airfix kit that everyone is leaping to buy.
surely not is offline  
Old 30th May 2006, 18:08
  #14 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by VivaTheBeaver
In the BA lounge at JFK, lots of Aussies being told to pick up their bags as their incoming aircraft hit a blast fence on the taxi in.
I just missed the excitement - I left the lounge about 45 minutes before you posted (on the 1900 BA to LHR), abandoning a number of Aussies sitting on the next sofa still eagerly discussing their forthcoming QF flight. Little did they know what was to come.
Globaliser is offline  
Old 31st May 2006, 02:33
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MASP

More Australian press coverage, The Age online:

"By Debbie Cuthbertson, Vanessa Burrow
May 30, 2006 - 3:32PM ...

Qantas is investigating an incident in which one of its jets carrying more than 200 passengers hit a fence at a United States airport.

One passenger on the flight has told theage.com.au the flight was like a minor collision in a car park.

The wing tip of a Qantas Boeing 747-400 struck a blast fence at new York's JFK Airport around 5pm local time yesterday (7am AEST), a Qantas spokesman has confirmed.

"QF107 from Los Angeles with 204 passengers on board was taxiing to the terminal at the time," the spokesman said.

"We understand it was being directed by an airport marshaller. No-one was hurt as a result of the incident."

Flight cancelled

Flight QF 108 from New York to Sydney flight was cancelled as a result of the incident, the spokesman said. Passengers on that flight have been booked on other flights, as have passengers who joined QF107 in Los Angeles. They are yet to depart.

The spokesman said he could not estimate the cost of the damage to the jet.

"We are currently assessing repairs needed to the wing tip," he said.

Qantas had notified the Australian Transport Safety Bureau and relevant US authorities about the incident, and would be conducting its own investigation.

"No one was hurt as a result of the incident and passengers were kept updated at all times by the flight crew," the spokesman said.

Passengers on board the flight said it took Qantas and airport staff about an hour to get the plane clear of the blast fence at the edge of the tarmac.

Greg, a passenger travelling on the flight to New York from Sydney via LA, told theage.com.au no one was injured or distressed in the minor accident.

'A bit like a car park accident'

"(It was) a bit like a car park accident, you know, when you bump one of those poles," he said.

"Everyone was pretty amused by it all."

Another passenger, who preferred not to be identified, said the flight crew appeared to overshoot the guide line for turning into the gate.

"Moments later a loud, shuddering groan shook the aircraft and we came to a stop," he said.

"Looking out the windows, we could see that the starboard wingtip had hit a blast fence . . . the damage to the leading edge of the wingtip was clearly visible."

The man said the first officer announced the accident, saying, "There's not much room to manoeuvre".

Crews lightened the wing by pumping fuel into the port wing fuel tank and removing luggage and cargo, and the wing was lifted clear of the fence."
MASP is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2006, 15:12
  #16 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 50
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SN

Whatever do you mean. Everyone knows Boeing plastic is invulnerable, not like that Airbus stuff... (tiptoes away)
MarkD is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2006, 08:52
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Usually Oz
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

With apologies to George Orwell, "All marshallers are wonderful; some are more wonderful than others!"

G'day
Feather #3 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2006, 10:03
  #18 (permalink)  
Plumbum Pendular
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Avionics Bay
Age: 55
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One passenger on the flight has told theage.com.au the flight was like a minor collision in a car park.
How refreshing to read a story about an aviation incident that has not been "sensationalised" (sic).
fmgc is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.