PIA rapped over jet blazes at Manchester Airport
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PIA rapped over jet blazes at Manchester Airport
Five fires on Pakistani International Airline jumbo jets at Manchester Airport were caused by faulty maintenance at the airline's Karachi workshops, a report has found. Experts were called into to investigate after the fifth fire in March last year resulted in an emergency evacuation of passengers after the jet, a new Boeing 777, taxied to a standstill.
After a 10 month investigation the UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) said that some maintenance men in Karachi were clearing heat shields in wheels by submerging them in a bath of flammable solvents even though they had been warned not to do this. This cased the saturated shields to catch fire as the pilot applied the breaks after landing with full loads at Manchester airport.
The report reveals that PIA bosses were aware of the problem as far back as June 2004 when they issued a memo outlawing the practice of using solvent baths for heat shields. But the practice appears to have continued in some cases says the report.
As a result of these findings PIA have undertake a re-training programme of maintenance staff and ordered that heat shields should be steam cleaned from now on.
The report also criticises the crew of the Boeing for acting too slowly in evaluating the 332 passengers. After being warned by fire chiefs that flames were coming from the wheel, and that an immediate evacuation was necessary, the report says the crew took too long getting passengers down the emergency slides because they failed to send them all down in twos.
It says: 'This, together with the apparent lack of a sense of urgency and the fact that some bags were thrown down the slides ahead of passengers, contributed to the long evacuation time of four minutes.'
http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/publicati...er__ap_bgl.cfm
After a 10 month investigation the UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) said that some maintenance men in Karachi were clearing heat shields in wheels by submerging them in a bath of flammable solvents even though they had been warned not to do this. This cased the saturated shields to catch fire as the pilot applied the breaks after landing with full loads at Manchester airport.
The report reveals that PIA bosses were aware of the problem as far back as June 2004 when they issued a memo outlawing the practice of using solvent baths for heat shields. But the practice appears to have continued in some cases says the report.
As a result of these findings PIA have undertake a re-training programme of maintenance staff and ordered that heat shields should be steam cleaned from now on.
The report also criticises the crew of the Boeing for acting too slowly in evaluating the 332 passengers. After being warned by fire chiefs that flames were coming from the wheel, and that an immediate evacuation was necessary, the report says the crew took too long getting passengers down the emergency slides because they failed to send them all down in twos.
It says: 'This, together with the apparent lack of a sense of urgency and the fact that some bags were thrown down the slides ahead of passengers, contributed to the long evacuation time of four minutes.'
http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/publicati...er__ap_bgl.cfm
Last edited by LTNman; 25th Feb 2006 at 13:15.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kot Addu
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not very security concious either http://www.historyofpia.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4773
Too mean to buy a long personal title
Originally Posted by LTNman
Five fires on Pakistani International Airline jumbo jets at Manchester Airport were caused by faulty maintenance at the airline's Karachi workshops ...
http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/publicati...er__ap_bgl.cfm
http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/publicati...er__ap_bgl.cfm
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did a PPRUNE search and could find no info on the results of the enquiry. If this is of no interest I will delete the thread
Last edited by LTNman; 25th Feb 2006 at 20:10.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not at all LTNman, the report maybe two months old, but no one has brought it to this forum as yet.
I know from experience how much business PIA bring to Manchester Airport, but at what price? Safety needs to be at the forefront of every airfields minds.
Since the last incident PIA have had a good record into and out of Manchester lets hope the worst is behind them and we can look forward to a renewed era of flights from PIA.
I know from experience how much business PIA bring to Manchester Airport, but at what price? Safety needs to be at the forefront of every airfields minds.
Since the last incident PIA have had a good record into and out of Manchester lets hope the worst is behind them and we can look forward to a renewed era of flights from PIA.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Euroland
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The report also criticises the crew of the Boeing for acting too slowly in evaluating the 332 passengers.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Planet Earth for a short visit
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well what was going on yesterday pm? A PIA 777 getting a good soaking from the fire crew on Papa taxiway after landing around 0930. Fluid all seemed to be aimed at Right Main Gear.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the report
So were the crew sloppy or is this a realistic evacuation time when you don’t use Boeing employees?
The slides were deployed in the sequence R1, 2, 3 and 4, with 41 seconds elapsed time from the first signs of slide R1 being deployed to slide R4 being fully deployed.
The slides took between six and eight seconds from first signs of deployment to being fully deployed. All of the slides operated by the cabin crew were effectively deployed and used.
It took four minutes and ten seconds from the first signs of slide R1 being deployed to when all of the 332 passengers had been evacuated.
It took three minutes and twenty seconds for the evacuation of passengers down slides R3 and R4. A further two minutes thirty seconds after the last passenger evacuated, a crew member evacuated down slide R3.
A light wind caused the slides to move slightly whilst they were in the process of deployment, but the slides were stable and stationary once in use and passengers were evacuating form the aircraft.
The slides from the Boeing 777 are designed for dual lane use. Continuous dual lane use was not achieved, and passengers tended to come down one after another. This, together with the apparent lack of a sense of urgency and the fact that some bags were thrown down the slides ahead of passengers, contributed to the long evacuation time of over four minutes. A rate of one passenger every two seconds appeared to be the best that was achieved.
The average rate down each of the slides was one passenger every two to three seconds. For certification, an evacuation rate of approximately one passenger per second is required to be demonstrated.
The slides took between six and eight seconds from first signs of deployment to being fully deployed. All of the slides operated by the cabin crew were effectively deployed and used.
It took four minutes and ten seconds from the first signs of slide R1 being deployed to when all of the 332 passengers had been evacuated.
It took three minutes and twenty seconds for the evacuation of passengers down slides R3 and R4. A further two minutes thirty seconds after the last passenger evacuated, a crew member evacuated down slide R3.
A light wind caused the slides to move slightly whilst they were in the process of deployment, but the slides were stable and stationary once in use and passengers were evacuating form the aircraft.
The slides from the Boeing 777 are designed for dual lane use. Continuous dual lane use was not achieved, and passengers tended to come down one after another. This, together with the apparent lack of a sense of urgency and the fact that some bags were thrown down the slides ahead of passengers, contributed to the long evacuation time of over four minutes. A rate of one passenger every two seconds appeared to be the best that was achieved.
The average rate down each of the slides was one passenger every two to three seconds. For certification, an evacuation rate of approximately one passenger per second is required to be demonstrated.
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by silverhawk
Well what was going on yesterday pm? A PIA 777 getting a good soaking from the fire crew on Papa taxiway after landing around 0930. Fluid all seemed to be aimed at Right Main Gear.
Scottie Dog
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Varies!
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some Companies use what's called a precautionary disembarkation which would involve use of slides if no steps available. This does not carrry the same urgency as a full emergancy evacuation to avoid unnecessary injury. Just a thought!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by silverhawk
Well what was going on yesterday pm? A PIA 777 getting a good soaking from the fire crew on Papa taxiway after landing around 0930. Fluid all seemed to be aimed at Right Main Gear.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=5681753
Originally Posted by silverhawk
Well what was going on yesterday pm? A PIA 777 getting a good soaking from the fire crew on Papa taxiway after landing around 0930. Fluid all seemed to be aimed at Right Main Gear.
All arriving PIA 777s will have a wash to get rid of the evidence of hydraulic leaks!!!
Lets all kick PIA in the teeth eh? A Good airline in need of some minor cleanups, and safe (look at their safety record).
I wonder if the AAIB would have been so quick to criticize a first world crew? One only has to wonder.
I wonder if the AAIB would have been so quick to criticize a first world crew? One only has to wonder.
Last edited by flash8; 28th Feb 2006 at 16:34.
Sims Fly Virtually
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Am I being a bit dense? Do I assume that 5 "fires" have only occurred at MAN?
Or do they happen everywhere and only MAN ones are reported? (here?)
Or do they happen everywhere and only MAN ones are reported? (here?)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the AAIB report postulates that most of the pia wheel fires occured at MAN because that would be the first full weight landing following maintenance at karachi which contaminated the brake shields...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The report also criticises the crew of the Boeing for acting too slowly in evaluating the 332 passengers. After being warned by fire chiefs that flames were coming from the wheel, and that an immediate evacuation was necessary, the report says the crew took too long getting passengers down the emergency slides because they failed to send them all down in twos.
Understandably reluctant maybe. After all they were stationary with a fire tender present. Evacuations can cause severe injury's and even fatalities.
Understandably reluctant maybe. After all they were stationary with a fire tender present. Evacuations can cause severe injury's and even fatalities.
