Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A340-600 Maiden Flight

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A340-600 Maiden Flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Apr 2001, 22:23
  #1 (permalink)  
FL390
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking A340-600 Maiden Flight

As the title of this thread suggests, the first flight of Airbus's A340-600 took off today. It is now the worlds longest aircraft at about 240ft (I think).

Virgin is launch customer fo 2002
 
Old 25th Apr 2001, 01:01
  #2 (permalink)  
Frederic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Go to the Airbus site and download the movies! Pretty impressive aircraft!
 
Old 25th Apr 2001, 14:36
  #3 (permalink)  
moschops
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

At 240ft I'll bet take-off needs a delicate touch. What's the aft ground clearance on rotation -- and how long before someone smacks the back end?
 
Old 25th Apr 2001, 14:50
  #4 (permalink)  
AhhhVC813
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Apparently needs no more of a gentle touch than any other long airliner, nor will it require two stage rotations. However there is a piece of software included, that will reduce rotation rate if the tail is in danger of being "banged in".
 
Old 25th Apr 2001, 17:01
  #5 (permalink)  
SilentHandover
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Expect to see one at the Farnborough Airshow 2002, officials from Airbus are visiting EGLF soon to see if it can cope with the MEgaLongBus.
 
Old 25th Apr 2001, 18:46
  #6 (permalink)  
ExSimGuy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

80 yds from front to rear? I hope it doesn't only have loos at the back end
 
Old 25th Apr 2001, 20:07
  #7 (permalink)  
Dropp the Pilot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Take as many pictures of this sad device as you can, 'cuz as soon as guaranteed performance numbers are released for the 777-200LR are released this 340 will become VERY rare indeed...

Emirates doesn't take delivery of the 340 for eighteen months yet, but they are already trying to flog them!
 
Old 25th Apr 2001, 20:10
  #8 (permalink)  
Wrongstuff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Dropp...Yep there's always one!
 
Old 25th Apr 2001, 21:06
  #9 (permalink)  
Seloco
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

With reference to AhhhVC813's post, and having now seen the Airbus videos, it did seem to me that there was indeed a two-stage rotation at take-off, or is this just a normal precaution on a first flight?
 
Old 25th Apr 2001, 22:40
  #10 (permalink)  
northern boy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I see the Boeing shareholders are back on line.Any more?.
 
Old 26th Apr 2001, 04:13
  #11 (permalink)  
Former_SLUF_Driver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

240 feet looooooooooooooooooooong

Copied from the A340-600 AFM:

NOTICE A tail strike can occur while parked unmanned on the ramp in a still wind.
 
Old 26th Apr 2001, 15:40
  #12 (permalink)  
AhhhVC813
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Sad device eh Dropp? The only sadness I see is in the dire insignificance of your irrelevant posting.
 
Old 27th Apr 2001, 00:29
  #13 (permalink)  
Kangar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Dropp, the airline who uses this aircraft to do the intended job of a 777-200LR would be very stupid indeed, but the one who use a 340-500 to fill that gap, they would be a little more clever........as for the sad device, well, maybe you should get right on the phone to AI and point those silly enineers in the right way, after all what would they know about building a plane? Hilarious.
 
Old 27th Apr 2001, 23:21
  #14 (permalink)  
Frederic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angel

Been in Toulouse today! Seen the 340-600 do touch and go's. Life! I sat at the holding point when it landed. It was about 200m from my aircraft. WHAAAAAW! What a beautifull aircraft! I'm in love...
Seems AI is in a bit of a hurry to get it certified. The testpilots seemed to be working the aircraft pretty hard today. Oh and Dropp, I think it's great you hate the Airbuses, just gives me more of a chance to fly one. Less competition. Wouldn't mind a 777 either though.
 
Old 28th Apr 2001, 13:26
  #15 (permalink)  
HOBAY 3
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Still a long way off M0.86 though....
 
Old 28th Apr 2001, 14:40
  #16 (permalink)  
Dropp the Pilot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Actually I don't hate Airbuses at all, my related sentiments are more of relief (having abandoned them entirely after 3500 hours on type) and hope (that I never ever have to fly one again).

More to the point, they are a continual source of amusement...for instance, why does Boeing have a bunch of unsellable 340's sitting in their backyard? Did you see any 777's parked in Toulouse?
 
Old 28th Apr 2001, 20:54
  #17 (permalink)  
NigelOnDraft
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

<<for instance, why does Boeing have a bunch of unsellable 340's sitting in their backyard? Did you see any 777's parked in Toulouse? >>

Just shows Boeing's selling tactics! They have to take your "unsellable" 340s in order to shift their products... The better salesman is the one with no surplus stock!

Have flown both A & B - both good products, find it a bit strange that there are those here who seemingly seriously don't appreciate there's room for both companies, and in fact beneficial for some genuine competition that keeps prices down, and innovation high.
 
Old 28th Apr 2001, 21:47
  #18 (permalink)  
crewrest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

HOBAY 3:

Mach .86 -v- .83/.84: Big deal.

How about:

10 tonnes an hour -v- 8 tonnes an hour: ?

Really don't see why we should get in a tissy, all this Boeing v Airbus crap is a waste of breath. I've been in bars where it has all got rather heated over this subject.

After all isn't it a Boeing expression 'if it looks good, it is good'
 
Old 28th Apr 2001, 23:09
  #19 (permalink)  
northern boy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Well said crew rest. At the end of the day airlines exist to make money.A big fast Boeing is fine if you can fill it up with punters and freight but if you are developing a new route or times are hard reduced fuel burn can mean the difference between profit and loss,and that can mean the difference between having a job and being down the road. Its a question of horses for courses.All this "real men fly Boeings" may make some people feel good about themselves but is totally irrelevant in the real world.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.