Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Retirement age for pilots now 65 in Asia.

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Retirement age for pilots now 65 in Asia.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Dec 2004, 12:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arrow Retirement age for pilots now 65 in Asia.

The retirement age for Japanese pilots has been raised from 63, to 65 recently.

The forthcoming "Baby Boomer" (post WWii) peak of imminent retirees has obviously played a major role in the JCAB's (Japan Civil Aviation Bureau's) decision to revise (upwards) the age at which pilots flying in Japan can operate domestically in airlines.

It is also an indication that Japan is unable to attract sufficient non-Japanese pilots, to fill the massive vacancies that will inevitably occur en masse, meaning Japanese airlines will be left unable to cope with projected future growth, and therefore losing valuable market share if Japan wishes to cash in on the burgeoning tourist influx.

The likely winners are the Chinese airlines, now actively recruiting foreign pilots to fill their own shortfalls.

China 's tourist numbers to Japan have been on a progressive rise for the past number of years, as the affordability of air travel, and affluence of that country increases.

Pilot salaries offered by Chinese airlines have been on a continual rise, whereas salaries and conditions offered by the Japanese have decreased, making the Japanese aviation employment scene "just another Asian contender", according to some pilot recruitment agencies.
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2004, 12:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know what the retirement ages are for the rest of the countries in the Far East hiring expats?

FM
Fr8t M8te is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2004, 14:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Out there
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With Europe having no limit from 2006, Hong Kong CAD will follow suit.
Baywatcher is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2004, 19:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Floating around the planet
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Baywatcher...

Is that true????No limit for airline pilots????

A-3TWENTY is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2004, 03:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very recently from a “horse’s mouth”:

In October 2005, ICAO will review the current air transport pilot (commander) retirement age of 60 as the overwhelming majority of contracting ICAO states is now in favour of revising upwards to age 65.

Formerly this scheme had been stymied by intervention from the USA but that nation’s objection has now been dropped as there is no convincing statistical medical evidence available to demonstrate the overriding necessity for pilot (commander) retirement at age 60.

Individual states may currently have retirement ages at, say 63-65, thus permitting domestic flying, but other states may prevent over-flight/landing of overage (60+) crews by citing the current ICAO age 60 rule that is, by default, incorporated into their own national legislation.

Eg: EU pilot (commander) retirement age 65 – France prevents over-flight/landing of such over 60’s crews by embracing the current ICAO retirement ruling (60) into its national legislation.

When ICAO moves upwards to retirement at 65, France will be unable to continue on this tack.

Last edited by highcirrus; 7th Dec 2004 at 05:18.
highcirrus is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2004, 07:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UAE
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm more interested in how soon I can retire, not how long I can keep working for!
BigGeordie is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2004, 07:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: A galaxy far far away
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember from my air law days that you could fly up to 65 as long as you were the only flight crew member onboard over 60. In other words as soon as you were 60 or over your first officer had to be 59 or less.

Does anyone else remember this?

T.
Teroc is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2004, 21:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool LASORS

LASORS Section A A9 JAR FCL

Age 60-64. The holder of a pilot licence who has attained the age of 60 years shall not act as a pilot of an aeroplane engaged in commercial air transport operations except:
as a member of a multi-pilot crew and provided that...
such holder is the only pilot in the flight crew who has attained the age of 60.

Age 65. The holder of a pilot licence who has attained the age of 65 years shall not act as a pilot of an aeroplane engaged in commercial air transport operations.
PODKNOCKER is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2004, 23:38
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: vancouver oldebloke
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just heard from a 'whiteeye'with Japan Air that they(whiteeyes) are allowed to stay until 63?at the moment....subject to change
oldebloke is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2004, 08:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Hartlepool
Age: 79
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kaptin M

Having been recently discarded by my company for having had the cheek to reach age 60 this is a subject close to my heart.

I believe that you may however been wrong about the Chinese; from what I've been able to establish China actively enforces an age 60 rule.

Regards

Packsonflite
packsonflite is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2004, 15:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If anyone has trouble sleeping, here's the ruling from the 1998 High Court of Australia case re the Rule of 60:

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/di...8+%20hca+18%22

I've scoured far & wide to try & find Annex I to the Chicago Convention but haven't been able to track it down. Might be that a change in the Convention is required...

One thing which I've wondered since the 1998 case: Capt Christie was a 744 pilot and Qantas' case was that he couldn't perform that job by operation of law in countries where he'd be required to operate.

What about if he was, say, a 737 pilot? It appears from the case that it was agreed that an over-60 pilot could operate to DPS, NAN and NZ as well as in Australia, due to lack of legislation in those countries forcing overflying pilots to be under 60. Do the 737s go further afield? If not, then by Qantas' own admission, then is the company forcing 737 pilots to retire at 60? Could 767/747/A330 pilots who reach 60, possibly convert to 737/717/DHC-8?
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2004, 17:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's all very well for the law to say that you can carry on to 65 but people grow older at different rates and I've flown with a few near 60 years old who really should have been retired. 5-6 days on, early starts and high intensity short-haul in busy airspace takes it out of me now, can't imagine being up to it aged 65. Granted there will be those who would still be up to it at 70, I know a few, but I can see an awfull lot of awkward and pride destroying sessions in the sim coming up if 65 becomes the norm. Not easy to take someone to one side and say "no more", pretty rare now but not in the future I fear.
Max Angle is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 17:55
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 71
Posts: 108
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone have a hard reference on this change from retirement at 60 to 65.

I find nothing at ICAO web.

Any official words or press releases? Any convincing web sites.

This is our future and will effect many of us. It cirtainly affects me!

Anyone??
Lord Lucan is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 18:30
  #14 (permalink)  
MPH
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Both sides of 40W
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Max Angle: Sorry to say it, but, I've flown with a lot of younger aged felllow pilots whom have had a wink or two, well before 'top of descent'!!!! It's all very relative but, to limit people on the assumption that age is a limiting factor to their abilities in carying out their profession is daft. It's more to do with Unions and the 'labour agreements', drafted and agreed upon to support and promote professionals within the companies. Let's be fair this regulation on 'age limitation' is long overdew for a change.

MPH is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 18:41
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
True, it's fair to say that we do all age at different rates - but it's also fair to say that statistically, people these days are not only living nominally longer, but are healthier longer as well. This has been happening over a period of years - in the Christie case, over Capt Christie's career the max age was moved from 55 to 60.

Lifestyle, genetics and a host of other factors doubtless play a part. The captain of the Iberia A340 which recently had to drop into Lisbon was doubtless within age and checked out fine at his last medical.

That didn't prevent him from later suffering a fatal heart attack.
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 21:01
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Taildragger67

Capt Christie and others wanted to continue flying, but if my memory is correct they wanted to continue on the 747-400. QF argued successfully in Court that they could not utilise them due to the type of flying the 400 did.
There are about 20-25 Captains with QF who are 60+ flying the 737, 767, A330 domestically in Australia and to NZ.
Bali comes under Indonesian rules who in the past have restricted the age rule to below 60.
I wander how many more in Qantas will now extend beyond 60!

Last edited by RaTa; 15th Dec 2004 at 21:58.
RaTa is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2004, 00:07
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 347
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Max Angle:

"I can see an awfull lot of awkward and pride destroying sessions in the sim coming up if 65 becomes the norm. Not easy to take someone to one side and say "no more", pretty rare now but not in the future I fear."

You make a very valid point. Starting your retirement unexpectedly as a result of a failure in the sim could be a very bitter pill to swallow. Most pilots I know take a great deal of pride in what they do and if your competence has degraded without your noticing it, it could be very tough to be told, as you put it, "no more".
Having said that I still find an arbitrary date to be illogical in determining your competency.
innuendo is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2004, 07:30
  #18 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
RaTa up to 2 years ago Indonesia allowed their own nationals to fly Part 121 until 64 and the only lmitation for pilots of foriegn registered aircraft was that they comply with the State of registrations rules....so a QF Captain could go on doing Bali until he failed a medical.

If it has changed since then I'm unaware.
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2004, 09:07
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chimbu Chuckles

For some reason only known to himself, one of our 60+ made an enquiry with the Indonesians and they said 60 was max. So he now does domestic and the odd Tasman.
Having said that I am willing to admit something may have gone astray in the translation.
RaTa is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2004, 13:41
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: on the move again...
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dragonair also had fun with this...

Believe Dragon also had fun with this issue afew years back when a 60yr old Captain was offered a 2 yr extension in the RHS in same aircraft/same company, only to find once he had commenced extensions that he was limited to shuttles between HKG & Taiwan with the odd flight elsewhere - I think he couldn't fly in to China if my memory serves....similar reasons to above...

I think he's now fully retired...

Not sure what HKCAD's view was of the the rules etc as I cannot recall accurately but I'm sure that one of the HK bods will do so...

Z.
Zones is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.