Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Two Russian pax a/c crashed within minutes of each other

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Two Russian pax a/c crashed within minutes of each other

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Aug 2004, 07:50
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Down south, USA.
Posts: 1,594
Received 9 Likes on 1 Post
Even if investigations over there conclude that terrorists were the cause, let's hope that the criminals are caught, and that the Western media, somehow, avoids splashing any graphic images all over the tv screens. This took place for weeks after 9/11, and the airport channels could not be changed!

Many people might still be frightened sheep regarding air travel. Let's hope, for the sake of many thousands of jobs 'on the line', that nothing multiplies the anxieties.
Ignition Override is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 08:00
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once again confusion reigns. So far this morning I have heard.

"both airplanes made a hijack distress signal"

"one airplane made a hijack distress signal"

"both planes made a hijack or some kind of other distress signal"

Anybody have any ATC news confirming what the Russian pilot(s) were squaking prior to going down? or is this more nonsense from our wonderful media?
InTheAir is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 08:33
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Zambia
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC news said this morning one A/C had sent out a "hijack alert" and the newsman described it as an "airbourne SOS". I presume that one of the pilots had managed to squwark 7500. Thats all that i can add really, except to say that if it is the Chechens, i hope this doesn't affect other nations aviation industries, as this is a particularly unfortunate russian problem.

Sad day.
itchy kitchin is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 08:36
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody have any ATC news confirming what the Russian pilot(s) were squaking prior to going down? or is this more nonsense from our wonderful media?
Being Russia, I would expeect details to be released very, very slowly.
Terror_is_firmer is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 09:04
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
10:44, Moscow time
Siberia Airlines official statement

According to updated information from Head of the Military Sector of the Main Center of the Russian Unified System of Air Traffic Control, the hijacking alarm which was received last night came from the TU-154 plane of Siberia Airlines. It happened just before the loss of contact with the plane and its disappearance from the radar screens.

As it has been reported, last night the air company's Flight Control Center received a telegram with information about the alarm sent from one of the missing planes and a request for additional security measures.
More airline's official statements (in English) on the Sibir website
cringe is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 09:12
  #46 (permalink)  

Coppula eam se non posit acceptera jocularum
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Northumberland, UK
Age: 61
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Russian news report:

http://www.gazeta.ru/2004/08/25/oa_131251.shtml

with summary in English:

http://www.gazeta.ru/2004/08/25/oa_131252.shtml

Report in Russian states (and please bear with my translation) that officials do not confirm that there was an act of terrorism, but indirect attributes speak about it. Representatives of the Ministry of Internal Affairs say they are already taking measures to increase security at many Russian airports, railway stations, sea and river ports. The TU154 had been in service since 1982, had 30751 hours and was last serviced this month. Less info about the TU134 although the airline state it was one of the best in the fleet. The local authorities in Rostov are preparing to accommode the families of victims. There are also links to the names of those who died (although Sibir have already made a change to the list because of confusion over a transit passenger at Moscow). RIP.
Evening Star is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 10:00
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: London
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They took off at the same time, went down at about the same time, but the crash sites are 500 miles apart. Any explanations/guesses?
Frangible is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 10:16
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They took off at the same time, went down at about the same time, but the crash sites are 500 miles apart. Any explanations/guesses?
Have you bothered to read the previous posts??
ABird747 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 10:38
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The departures were over an hour apart with the Tu-154 taking off for Sochi at 9:25 p.m. and the Tu-134 for Volgograd at 10:32 p.m.

Source: Bloomberg quoting Russian officials
cringe is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 11:00
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dublin
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All in all another sad day for aviation. May all passengers & crew rest in peace.
Flying Mech is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 11:02
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North London, England
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So far from the info we have I would go along with them both being terrorist attacks. It's too much of a coincidence surely, plus there was that "hijack" alert from the 154.
Maniac618 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 11:23
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel contamination from the same tanker???
LTNman is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 11:24
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: guernsey
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chronology/Locations

This is the BBC Timeline of the incident:

Domodedovo Airport
1735: A Sibir Airlines Tu-134 bound for Volgograd departs

1815: A Volga-Aviaexpress Tu-154 leaves for Sochi

1856: Contact lost with Tu-154 (41 mins after t/o)

1859: Contact lost with Tu-134 (1 hr 24 mins after t/o)

Tula region Wreckage from Tu-134 found near the village of Buchalki soon after contact is lost - 125 Miles from Moscow - in 1 hr 24 min

Rostov-on-Don: Wreckage from Tu-154 found - 600 miles from Moscow. - in 41 min....

Either this chronology is wrong...or something else is up
kuningan is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 11:45
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: London
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read the post that said
"Both planes left Moscow's Domodedovo Airport about 10:30 p.m." The reporting moved on, and now I know different but why don't you save your sarcasm for something worth while Abird747?
Frangible is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 11:59
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: what U.S. calls ´old Europe´
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some picture from german ´stern´ online news :


Only new information on that site is that the 154 should have broken up in midair before crashing.

my feelings are with the cictims.
Volume is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 13:14
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
I've always found current Russian airport security to be the equal of that in the west; going through there again this weekend and have no qualms. In fact, it doesn't suffer from the American concern about politically correctness and just intensive searching 1 in every n pax even if they're old ladies; in Russia they go through whoever they please. I presume there are certain social groupings that get checked over every time. So be it.

The 134 in question, for those discussing aircraft age, was built in 1977. Bear in mind that Russian aircraft do nothing like the hours of those in the west. The fairly intact panel in the picture above with the registration on it is the (appears to be port) engine cowling.

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/604674/M/

Thoughts with the families of those involved.
WHBM is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 13:35
  #57 (permalink)  
See and avoid
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 687
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts
Only new information on that site is that the 154 should have broken up in midair before crashing.
What does "should have broken up" mean? Does that mean they think it did, based on the wreckage?
visibility3miles is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 13:57
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Chechens not responsible for Russia crashes says aide

Wed 25 August, 2004 14:14

LONDON (Reuters) - A London-based spokesman for the leader of Chechnya's main rebel group says it is not responsible for near-simultaneous air crashes in Russia which killed 89 people.

Asked if his group was responsible for the crashes, Akhmed Zakayev, a spokesman for Chechnya's separatist leader Aslan Maskhadov, told Reuters in London: "Of course not."

"To us any form of terrorism is absolutely unacceptable. We have condemned it and continue to condemn it," he said...

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackage...9&section=news

__________________________________________

...President Vladimir Putin, vacationing in Sochi, ordered the FSB security service to investigate the crashes ahead of Sunday's presidential election in Chechnya. Rebel separatists have threatened to disrupt the poll with violence.

"The main line of inquiry we are following is violation of the rules of operating civil aircraft," FSB spokesman Sergei Ignatchenko said.

Ignatchenko said this meant pilot error, mechanical defects or problems with fuel quality -- prime suspects in Russia, where pilots are poorly paid and planes often old.

"We are also examining the possibility of a terrorist act, but we have no evidence to support this."...

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackage...8&section=news
Airbubba is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 14:02
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on here. Lets look at the odds. They both left same airport and crash within minutes of each other even though they left 40 minutes apart. I would like to think fuel quality, but there is just too much that points to sabotage.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 14:21
  #60 (permalink)  
Union Goon
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from Itchy Kitchum
i hope this doesn't affect other nations aviation industries, as this is a particularly unfortunate russian problem.
Nope its not. Its a problem for ALL aviation and it is VERY naive to think otherwise. A few determined lunatics acting in concert can do this anywhere, and every country on earth has a few lunactics who can't get what they want at the polls or are just imbalanced/indoctrinated and in their certainty that they are right will resort to other means.

Don't dismiss it because it only happened so far in Russia or the USA or Israel or Pakistan, or the planet Mars or somewhere else that you feel superior to. Attempts have been made in Europe and Asia to do similar things. That they were foiled was due as much to luck as anything else.


FOCAL,
Unfortunately I agree with you. Fuel contamination would be most likely at a similar time after take off. Not similar time on the clock.

I hope all the crews and pax rest easy.

Cheers
Wino
Wino is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.