Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Reporters Sneaking fake bombs onto airplanes (Merged)

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Reporters Sneaking fake bombs onto airplanes (Merged)

Old 24th Aug 2004, 14:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reporters Sneaking fake bombs onto airplanes

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...0328&printer=1

Thats a little bit of BS
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 14:14
  #2 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Co-Pilot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Sky
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747,

Its a disgrace i know and its not helping our industry either... These do anything to sell a newspaper without thinking of the consequences
AIRWAY is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 14:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK , Coventry
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<I could have wiped out more than 220 British passengers... and thousands more on the ground below," France said.>>

Thousands?!?
G-TFLY is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 14:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Age: 48
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its not helping our industry either
How is revealing (yet a-bloody-gain) how p*ss-poor UK airport security is "not helping?" Or does it need a real bomb before anyone actually takes action. The tombstone imperitive is very popular in this industry after all.
eal401 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 14:27
  #5 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Co-Pilot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Sky
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well there's other ways of solving these kind of problems than jumping straight to the public eye, i mean this is just giving terrorists ideas.

But its only my interpretation.
AIRWAY is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 14:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Age: 48
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just giving terrorists ideas.
I doubt that very much. No journalists sneaked box cutters onto aircraft before 9/11 did they?
eal401 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 14:43
  #7 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How long is it going to be before one of these journos gets a bullet in their head from and unfortunate over-reacting security staff member for trying something like this? Imagine the headlines.

Take that tool that sat on a jet brandishing a knife for his photographer to take snaps of. What would have happened if somebod yon the flight had seen this, and forcibly tried to take the knife of him?
Jerricho is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 15:09
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Age: 48
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How long is it going to be before one of these journos gets a bullet in their head
I think we'll have a while to wait before that happens.

The real question is, did The Sun suddenly decide to do this, or were they "tipped off" about the state of security at Birmingham?
eal401 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 15:17
  #9 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,143
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
I could have wiped out more than 220 British passengers... and thousands more on the ground below," France said.
Well - actually - No!! Not unless he had the knowledge and ability to:[list=1][*]Locate the components of a bomb [*]Assemble it without blowing himself up [*]Get it through security [*]Get past the staff without looking and feeling uncomfortable and therefore suspicious. [*]Carry out the plan to kill everyone without being waylaid. [*]Ensure that he had left a full record of his plan at home, so that he could receive full credit in the media, as he would (fortunately) have died in the process. [/list=1]
These journos have such inflated ideas of their abilities and only know how to write sensationalist headlines.


--------------------
"I tell you, we are here on Earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
PAXboy is online now  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 15:23
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just cannot understand the reaction to this particular journo.

He has shown once again how poor security still is, how poor the checks still are and that if you are not prepaed to invest in personnel and training it will not get any better.

Do the Pilot fraternity not have an interest in supporting anything that highlights the fact that it is still easy to smuggle articles onto aircraft?

Strikes me that you are much more interested in reporter bashing than looking at the underlying problems.

As for "giving terrorists ideas", well, what utter rubbish!

PAXboy

I think he theoretically managed points 1 to 5!

If he had been the "genuine terrorist" he would have had access to the components and knowledge to set it up.

On point 6, as an airport worker, he didn\'t need to stay on borad to get blown up, just set a timer me thinks!!
desert_knight is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 15:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California USA
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see nothing in the article (please correct me if I missed it) that would indicate that this guy had any explosives among his bomb components. In other words, even if he'd been subjected to neutron-based detection (or another follow-on "bomb-sniffing" technology), he'd still have been allowed to pass because he did not actually HAVE any explosives. Then he'd have been able to claim that, even though his equipment had been "swabbed," they STILL failed to detect his "bomb." Of course, that would only have shown that the system worked, having not alarmed with a false-positive...

--Edited to reiterate that he did not have a bomb. I think Paxboy's points remain valid, especially the point regarding acting suspicious. Again, he DID NOT HAVE A BOMB. I'm willing to wager that, had he had a bag with a few kilos of C4 in it he would have acted differently. THAT may have been enough to change the outcome (not to mention land him in jail).
av8boy is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 15:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do they subject all maintenance staff to that from of checking at BHX??
Do they even have the equipment?
desert_knight is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 15:43
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: South Africa
Age: 59
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

It seems to me that most of the world have the security issues all screwed up.
The Airplane has become the weapon. NOT the box cutter, the cutlery or your favourite swiss army knife.
Are the measures taken at airports throughout the world really effective at securing THAT weapon ??
Airguitar is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 16:14
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If a normal fare-paying punter had tried to smuggle a fake bomb onto a flight, no doubt that passenger would be arrested, hauled up in court, probably get some sort of criminal record, and almost certainly be banned from flying with the airline concerned for the rest of their life.

Although I suspect he'll get away with what he's done (and maybe some will even applaud him for exposing a supposed loop hole in airport security), I sincerely hope that this PRAT from the Sun gets the same sort of treatment from the authorities that any normal passenger doing the same sort of thing would get.
EastMids is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 16:49
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
some will even applaud him for exposing a supposed loop hole in airport security
Maybe I missed something, but wasn't there a bit of a gap in the security!

.......was employed by private contractor Aviance despite giving bogus references and bank details.
This by itself is a pretty serious hole - considering the much hyped need for increased security!

I suggest you direct your criticism at the people who have left these large holes, namely the BAA and the contractors they hire.
desert_knight is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 16:50
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: The Land Downunder
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This just drives me absolutely mad!!! I use BHX quite a lot and this doesn't suprise me at all. Just about every time I go through security I am scrutinised, searched and generally harassed. Myself and other flight crew that I have been with have had all sorts confiscated like nail clippers, razors (e.g. Gillette Mach 111), and a compass of all things. Whilst this is happening workman with tool boxes overflowing (gets me mad as I am not even allowed a screw driver incase I need to do something crazy like manually check fuel levels!!!) just get waved through because the security staff obviously find them familiar. Doesn't just happen at BHX either. It would seem that this reporter has highlighted a very weak area, whilst flightcrew and passengers are treated like criminals they seem to not apply the same level of scrutiny to all levels of staff.
Artificial Horizon is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 17:41
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: london/UK
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Firstly, the jurno is not lightly to be prosecuted, it would not be in the public interest. He has shown a loophole in security at Brum, and that alone will negate any attempt to get him into court.

Did the press do this before 7/11? Yes they did, on a regular basis. So did the father on of one the victims of Lockabie.

Paxboy,

Did you read the artical? The point is that he has all the compants to make a bomb, except the explosives. Those are not difficult to come by if you happen to move in terrorist circles. He was not going to kill himself, as he wasn't planning to staying in the cargo hold, where he quite obviouisly would have been able to place a bomb had he brought the real thing with him.

While I am not a fan of the press, at least they have not got thier heads in the sand on this matter. Which would you rather have? This sort of artical, or photos of a smoldering hole?
bjcc is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 18:13
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Embedded in a pocket of resistance
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Although I’m no big fan of this sensationalistic sort of ‘investigative’ journalism, I have to admit that the current paranoid “security” system is begging to be exposed by these sort of journalists.

Basically we have an incompetent bureaucracy spinning out of control by confiscating nail clippers from flight crew (with crash axe in the cockpit ) or 90 year old granny’s while at the same time leaving complete areas in security uncovered.

At Crossair/Swiss we frequently complained about a certain French airport where all flight crew were intensely checked, while all ground crew (with access to aircraft!) was able to totally circumvent security! One morning a flight attendant had some difficulty opening the plastic wrap that holds together newspapers, the catering guy said “let me ‘elp you, mon cheri,” went to his catering truck and returned with a 30cm steak knife! All query’s from our Security Officer were systematically brushed aside by the French Airport Authorities with he usual efficient French mixture of ‘laissez faire’ and “Errrr….station culling?”

Just like the current ridiculous jumpseat restrictions, we desperately need some common sense in the security debate.
Robert Vesco is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 20:30
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: South East UK
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I missing something?


All this guy seems to have done is shown that he can get something which isn't a bomb on board a flight.


Er...I usually do that whenever I fly.
Kalium Chloride is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 20:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BHX Security a joke

As usual the small minded idiots at BHX security are to busy removing safety equipment from the first aid kits that crews have to have ( an ANO requirment ) rather than doing anything usefull.

The DFT should have a good look at BHX they will find it to be the most stupid security setup in the UK.
A and C is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.