![]() |
N185CH
Any idea what this is doing flying around the UK this week? (Manchester, Tatenhill, Biggin Hill etc)
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....b5deaa70ed.jpg |
It’s not a Chinook!
|
It's not a Chinook; it only has one engine and is thus a CH 46 not a CH 47.
|
|
Rather a big aircraft to be single engine.
|
Originally Posted by Rho Tarbled
(Post 11740203)
Rather a big aircraft to be single engine.
|
I'd like to have seen that! If I'd been paying attention at 10am when it departed Biggin, I might have done!
Looks doing a lift at Tatton Park? |
Looking at the N number…..ex- Columbia Helicopters or perhaps a long term lease from them.
N185CH KV107 by swissheli.com A Kawasaki built aircraft. CN 4003 It would be funny if is also the one used in the James Bond film “You only Live Twice”. UPDATE: Found out it was not the Kawasaki/Vertol used in “You Only Live Twice” that was “ 1963-05-20 BV-107II-2 c/n 105 supplied in kit form to Kawasaki in 1962, built as KV-107II-2, c/n 4004, del KHI-Air Lift Inc as JA9503, 20May63. used in filming James Bond 007 movie "You Only Live Twice" w/o 05Aug67 with 1872 total flight hours. https://www.helis.com/pics/whodata.jpg https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/55986 The Heliswiss N185CH is Kawasaki C/N 4003 the preceding one off the line. |
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....d0c2dd517e.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....a22f2ef543.jpg Found these on the interweb. |
Originally Posted by chevvron
(Post 11740175)
It's not a Chinook; it only has one engine and is thus a CH 46 not a CH 47.
|
Originally Posted by treadigraph
(Post 11740281)
I'd like to have seen that! If I'd been paying attention at 10am when it departed Biggin, I might have done!
Looks doing a lift at Tatton Park? |
Having visited JMSDF helicopter mines sweeping squadron in the 1980s, the KHI Vertol 107s were the current airborn minesweeping assets of the time. They were being replaced by a fleet of Sikorsky S-80M-1 (MH-53Es) at that time The 107s were sold world wide. I later saw one was part of a Swedish navy fleet. They were relatively low flight time machines as the JMSDF retired their aircraft after 5000 hours as part of the JMSDF policy. They were also meticulously maintained.
|
One of my favourite "what-if's" when I was younger - what if the UK had bought 107s (or Phrogs, or other mil versions thereof) as a means of using all those Gnome engines instead of the Wessex? All that useful cabin space, with excellent access - and no combining gearbox or engines pointed at some ridiculous angle down toward the ground requiring an equally-ridiculous nose-door. I'm sure the Phrog had its handling idiosyncrasies, but were they any worse than the ground-resonance-prone, over-powered but underperforming (especially at altitude) Wessex? I bet the seating arrangement was less likely to cripple the pilot, too.
|
Do I recall the CH-46 had something of a structural issue early on (I saw a macabre joke that an airborne CH-46 could potentially become a formation of two CH-23s...)?
|
no combining gearbox The Boeing Vertol 107-II is a large twin-turbine engined Air Transport category helicopter of all-metal semi-monococque stressed-skin construction. It has tandem 3-bladed fully articulated rotorheads with partially-overlapping blades, which are synchronised by a mix box, forward and aft transmissions and interconnecting drive shafts. |
Quite right of course, SASless - but in my 6 years on Wessex vs 9 years on Chinook, I never heard of any crew wrecking a Vertol (OK, Boeing..) combiner whereas the one in the Wessex (and Lynx..) positively invited error from distracted aircrew. I wouldn't mind betting that the HYD systems on the Vertol design both carried on working in the event of a double-donk stop, unlike the Wessex.
|
Originally Posted by Thud_and_Blunder
(Post 11741366)
Quite right of course, SASless - but in my 6 years on Wessex vs 9 years on Chinook, I never heard of any crew wrecking a Vertol (OK, Boeing..) combiner whereas the one in the Wessex (and Lynx..) positively invited error from distracted aircrew. I wouldn't mind betting that the HYD systems on the Vertol design both carried on working in the event of a double-donk stop, unlike the Wessex.
|
Tis always best to speak reverently of the RCAF SAR Labrador Helicopter variant.
The crews luved that machine. |
Tread,
Do I recall the CH-46 had something of a structural issue early on (I saw a macabre joke that an airborne CH-46 could potentially become a formation of two CH-23s...)? |
Originally Posted by SASless
(Post 11741924)
Tread,
I met a very nice fellow who had reached senior management at one of the Gulf of Mexico outfits that had in his service in the US Navy been a pilot in just such a CH-23...and survived the event despite it having occurred in cruise flight. I rubbed his shoulder raw hoping such luck would rub off on to me. cheers |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:10. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.