PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   R44 Down in Fiji (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/624264-r44-down-fiji.html)

gruung 5th August 2019 06:26

R44 Down in Fiji
 
Sad news coming from Fiji, an R44 registration DQ-HPT crashed on Friday night whilst doing a medivac with 3 on board.

Some of the debris from the crash has washed up ashore and they have recovered one body, they are still searching for the bodies of the pilot and child. According to reports the helicopter went missing at 6:45pm on Friday night so it would have been dark and they were flying over water.

Search fijisun or fijivillage for the news articles

Twist & Shout 5th August 2019 09:51

When I flew there, no SE/VFR at night.
(Night time was for drinking....)
Have things (Rules) changed?

gulliBell 5th August 2019 09:56

R44. At night. Over water. Single pilot. I'm lost for words.
And mention in the Fiji media that the search/rescue effort on the night was not launched due to approaching bad weather.

gruung 5th August 2019 10:09


Originally Posted by Twist & Shout (Post 10537119)
When I flew there, no SE/VFR at night.
(Night time was for drinking....)
Have things (Rules) changed?

Twist & Shout you are correct there are no night ops unless it is a mercy flight.

[email protected] 5th August 2019 10:19

Gulli - agreed, it beggars belief - we often see comments here that there are no new ways of crashing a helicopter and this guy seems to have proved it.

gulliBell 5th August 2019 11:15


Originally Posted by gruung (Post 10537136)
Twist & Shout you are correct there are no night ops unless it is a mercy flight.

And I guess there would be no training or maintaining of currency at night in anticipation of any mercy flight.


garly1 5th August 2019 23:18

It wasn't a night flight, it was reported overdue that night. There is no night flying in Fiji unless its a mercy flight, this med evac was day VFR.
Bad weather and getting worse and a pilot that unfortunately wasn't experienced enough to say no.

malabo 6th August 2019 01:28

Wasn’t that long ago that a CHC Australia 407 crashed doing the same thing.
Queensland 407 crash

gulliBell 6th August 2019 08:50


Originally Posted by garly1 (Post 10537695)
It wasn't a night flight...

According to this report it crashed at night. Maybe they have miss reported. Or maybe not.

https://fijisun.com.fj/2019/08/05/he...ions-continue/


homonculus 6th August 2019 20:43

I didnt know Frank had brought out a stretched 44.....

How on earth would you put a patient in a 44??

Photonic 6th August 2019 21:38


Originally Posted by homonculus (Post 10538517)
I didnt know Frank had brought out a stretched 44.....

How on earth would you put a patient in a 44??

According to that news link above, the patient was a 2-year old child.

homonculus 7th August 2019 11:35


According to that news link above, the patient was a 2-year old child.
It was a SICK 2 year old child - the article says the pilot 'looked at the weather BUT his heart was for the child and he wanted to help the child get medical attention.'

Sadly this says everything - trying to fly a sick child in a 4 seat aircraft with I assume no medical modification is itself unbelievable - how do you immobilise let alone monitor the patient? And to launch into what appears from the report to be inclement weather just lined up the holes in the cheese.

RIP

Nescafe 7th August 2019 13:25


the article says
It must be true then.

krypton_john 7th August 2019 21:16


Originally Posted by homonculus (Post 10538999)
It was a SICK 2 year old child - the article says the pilot 'looked at the weather BUT his heart was for the child and he wanted to help the child get medical attention.'

Sadly this says everything - trying to fly a sick child in a 4 seat aircraft with I assume no medical modification is itself unbelievable - how do you immobilise let alone monitor the patient? And to launch into what appears from the report to be inclement weather just lined up the holes in the cheese.

RIP

Maybe the child was 100% going to die if not transferred. Tough not to take a calculated risk. There but for the grace of God...



[email protected] 8th August 2019 06:17


Maybe the child was 100% going to die if not transferred. Tough not to take a calculated risk. There but for the grace of God...
but it is exactly that thought process that keeps costing lives instead of preserving them - the mercy mission by someone inappropriately trained or equipped so often ends in disaster.

krypton_john 8th August 2019 06:52


Originally Posted by [email protected] (Post 10539782)
but it is exactly that thought process that keeps costing lives instead of preserving them - the mercy mission by someone inappropriately trained or equipped so often ends in disaster.

Of course. But do the math - if for example 100% child fatality if not transferred, Say for example 10% probability of catastrophic mission failure. Abort the mission 10 times is 10 child deaths. Perform the mission 10 times is 1 child death, one pilot death one carer death. 10 vs 3 who's to say which is worse?




homonculus 8th August 2019 10:04

Sorry KJ I cannot believe you are serious. Even ignoring the risk to people on the ground are you really advocating accepting deaths of pilots and healthcare workers every tenth flight???? Crab is right - this sort of nonsense is what is costing innocent lives in the EMS world and amongst well meaning amateurs. Even in standard land ambulances we do not put healthcare workers at risk even if patients come to harm as a result - your argument would result in hundreds of dead and maimed ambulance workers just attending standard trauma events on our roads. And a helicopter in this respect is just an expensive ambulance

havick 8th August 2019 17:22


Originally Posted by krypton_john (Post 10539790)
Of course. But do the math - if for example 100% child fatality if not transferred, Say for example 10% probability of catastrophic mission failure. Abort the mission 10 times is 10 child deaths. Perform the mission 10 times is 1 child death, one pilot death one carer death. 10 vs 3 who's to say which is worse?

this really is flawed logic.

You can’t make someone else’s problem your problem. You have to take emotion out of it and treat the patient like you were transporting cardboard boxes.

Different story for military ops as far as risk goes. But for civilian operations there’s no need to put your crew at unnecessary risk.

krypton_john 8th August 2019 22:32


Originally Posted by homonculus (Post 10539956)
Sorry KJ I cannot believe you are serious. Even ignoring the risk to people on the ground are you really advocating accepting deaths of pilots and healthcare workers every tenth flight???? Crab is right - this sort of nonsense is what is costing innocent lives in the EMS world and amongst well meaning amateurs. Even in standard land ambulances we do not put healthcare workers at risk even if patients come to harm as a result - your argument would result in hundreds of dead and maimed ambulance workers just attending standard trauma events on our roads. And a helicopter in this respect is just an expensive ambulance

Of course I am not seriously advocating this. Sheesh. Jeez guys, do I have to spell it out for you? Do you all have to treat everything you read literally?

Just pointing out that it's just so easy to be all pious and holier than thou when sitting behind your keyboard.

As to being serious "risk to people on ground"? FFS discussion was re island to island hops in Fiji not a flight across NYC!

I think a lot of you haven't traveled much and have no idea what people in places like Fiji are dealing with.



krypton_john 8th August 2019 22:34


Originally Posted by havick (Post 10540258)


this really is flawed logic.

You can’t make someone else’s problem your problem. You have to take emotion out of it and treat the patient like you were transporting cardboard boxes.

Different story for military ops as far as risk goes. But for civilian operations there’s no need to put your crew at unnecessary risk.

Couldn't agree with you more. I guess this forum isn't the place for devil's advocate argument and abstract discussion. It beggars belief that you lot can't see this or could think I am actually advocating taking 10% fatality risks.

FFS where is that emoji with the head banging against a wall when you need it? :ugh:




All times are GMT. The time now is 14:43.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.