Ned,

Not true: Lindsay's AW169 is going strong and actually has the 4.8 tonne upgrade along with RNAV approaches. The undercarriage problems are also fixed.

The sale to UK was another Australian VIP AW169 about 5 months ago :ok:

Thanks John, I think the confusion was Lindsay's friend had his 169 painted the same colours :)

Hi all,
Please someone could let me know what could be the max. payload for AW169 O&G configuration?
Thanks

John, do you know what sort of speed Linfox are getting out of their 169?? How slow are these things?

Is it just slow for an Agusta, or is it actually slow?

Hello all,
Are there any AW169's in the US?

AW169
 

Anyone been through the aw169 course here? Pm if so.

Hey guys! I was wondering,... looking through the AW169 manual and not finding any charts, can anyone share a practical crusing speed for MCP at lower altitudes and fuel burn at that setting?

Also, can somebody confirm a clean airframe with external hoist would be around 3000kg?

Thanks!

Not sure if you are comparing a T2 or not, but quick glance of your number does not seem right. And after the 5 blade mod kicks in, 169 may not has a lot meaningful load advantage either.

Big News!!!
 

Leonardo Helicopters announced at HAI a significant increase in performance for the AW169...
Take a look at the article from AINonline:
---------------

Performance Packages Increase Power, Payload for AW169

by Mark Humber - January 28, 2020, 12:01 AM

Leonardo is developing two performance packages for the AW169 medium twin that will increase engine shaft horsepower (shp), transmission rating, and available payload. The "Enhanced" and “Superior” performance packs rely on software updates and minor aerodynamic modifications to deliver increased performance. Leonardo expects EASA approval for the packages by the end of 2020 and will make them available on new deliveries and as a retrofit to existing helicopters beginning in 2021.

Retrofit pricing was not disclosed, but a company spokesman said he expected the retrofits to require 16 man-hours of labor. Available payload would increase from 440 to 770 pounds, depending on phase of flight and external conditions; more than 770 pounds for hovering, over 660 pounds for CAT. A-PC1 operations, and 440 pounds for one-engine-inoperative (OEI) hover. Shortly after initial EASA certification approval for the helicopter, Leonardo certified the AW169 for a maximum gross weight increase from 4.6 to 4.8 tons in 2016. That increased-gross-weight kit upped the aircraft’s maximum takeoff weight from 10,141 to 10,582 pounds, a capability that could add up to 100 nm of additional range from the original ferry range of 431 nm (no reserve).

Leonardo’s Samuele Tosi, head of product marketing for dual-use helicopters, said the performance packs produce an increase of approximately 144 shp on the 1,000-shp Pratt & Whitney PW210A Fadec-controlled engines, and an increased transmission rating of approximately 150 shp. He said the differences between the packages is price and the amount of shp increase—with the Enhanced pack delivering approximately two-thirds the power increase of the Superior pack. He said the power increases would give the AW169 “the highest power-to-weight ratio in its class.

“The AW169 is designed to surpass customers’ expectations and set a new market standard within its category,” Tosi said, adding that it appeals to a wide variety of customers, including those upgrading from Part 27 helicopters (up to 7,000 pounds MTOW) and those switching from older, larger twins, including the BK117 and Bell 412. “Those designs are now showing their age,” he said.

Customers not only appreciate the AW169 and its newer design standards; more are attracted to it because of its flexible, multi-mission capabilities and quick-change configurations, a Leonardo spokesman told AIN. As an example, he pointed out the fleet of three AW169s acquired by Travis County, Texas, that will be used for a combination of firefighting, EMS, and law-enforcement missions. He also noted that the AW169 received military certification last year. “The market is showing increased interest in a range of missions. This upgrade provides a wide variety of applications spanning from civil to parapublic to military in all weather conditions.” The spokesman said that the helicopter had seen “very interesting success in more niche applications” such as wind farm support and electronic newsgathering in Japan.

Since the AW169 was first certified by EASA in 2015, more than 100 of these helicopters have been delivered and over 220 have been ordered. The in-service fleet has logged 45,000 flight hours with the fleet leader surpassing 2,000 hours. The aircraft features Collins glass-panel touchscreen avionics with capabilities that include a four-axis digital automatic flight control system and a dual flight-management system.

Top cruising speed is 155 knots, and the 222-cu-ft cabin can accommodate seven to 10 passengers. The aircraft is manufactured at Leonardo’s plant in Vergiate, Italy.

Just out of curiosity, what helicopter is currently overpowering the 169 “in it’s class”? H160 is underpowered, 412 had gained weight, AS365/EC155 is underpowered,... which one?

AW169 Sim
 

With Leonardo temporarily closing its training facility at Sesto Calende, due to the lockdown over Corona, are there any other AW169 Sims being developed? Coptersafety are close to sorting theirs in Helsinki but are there any others?

Nope!
The one in Coptersafety is nowhere near to be ready, and the second Leonardo should go to Philadelphia sometime later this September.

Are you sure about this ? H160 power to weight ratio is quite the same as AW169 one (maybe better at the MTOW of 5670kg).

lets go for the best in arrano power range,...

H160
1300hp/5670kg = 0,23

AW169 (before the announced power boost)
1180hp/4800kg = 0,25
after power boost 1324hp/4800 = 0,28
after expected mtom increase
1324hp/5000 = 0,26

Using the increased GW for H160 calcs makes it a 412 “killer” material.

H145 Arriel 2e

1072bhp/3700kg = 0.29

It is only a '412 killer' if it can match or exceed the 412 in all other areas. I would be interested to see if it could fly 8 hours per day water bombing for weeks on end with minimal maintenance and few unserviceability issues. Very pretty though....

That we shall see, but I doubt in the first years. We have 212, 412, 169,... whenever the 100hrs check comes, it’s not exactly “minimum maintenance”, unless under some “non-easa” regs.

If weight and power to weight ratio is the only parameter you take into account to determine a "412 killer" you are missing out on 40 years of technological and avionics advances.