PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Helicopters without correlators? (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/417159-helicopters-without-correlators.html)

Stuck_in_an_ATR 4th June 2010 08:35

Helicopters without correlators?
 
Hi

Are/were there any helicopters built without a power correlator? What were they like to fly?

chopjock 4th June 2010 08:48

The Enstrom 280C for one. Flies beautifully.:ok:

RINKER 4th June 2010 09:22

As far as I know Bell 47,so I've been told ,never had the pleasure of flying one but is on my list.
R

Stuck_in_an_ATR 4th June 2010 09:44

@ Chopjock,

Are you talking about corellator or governor? I fly the Enstrom 280FX and it certainly has a correlator. No governor, though...

flighttest-engineer 4th June 2010 09:46

Yes, the Bell 47 did not have a governor to correlate the pitch-setting with the required engine power-setting.
I took my first helicopter hours at the controls of this historical machine decades ago.

Helibloke 4th June 2010 09:55

I'm pretty sure the Bell 47 has a correlator. Have a look at the pilot's side of the aircraft, you will see a thin box with a rod going forward to the cabin.

My memory is shot but I am sure this is a correlator box.

Chopper Doc 4th June 2010 09:58

Both the Enstrom 28A and the 280 and 280C did not have any throttle correlation. The 28F and the 280FX both have a mechanical throttle correlator.

paco 4th June 2010 10:03

The Bell 47 does indeed have a correlator, but the Hiller 12E doesn't

phil

Stuck_in_an_ATR 4th June 2010 10:07

Thanks for answers! Will have to try it out someday :)

rotarywise 4th June 2010 10:29

Next Tuesday it will be exactly 39 years since I first flew a Hiller 12E and, even without a correlator, it was a great machine - 50 hours later I 'progressed' to the Whirlwind 7, which did have a correlator, but wasn't half as much fun.

Graviman 4th June 2010 11:27

Are there any machines, other than Lynx, that have correlators from pedals to throttle/collective (governed or otherwise)?

chopjock 4th June 2010 11:50

I design, build and fly UAVs. The tail rotor is correlated to the throttle. More left pedal, more throttle, less left pedal less throttle. We also correlate pitch and tail rotor, particularly useful when climbing and descending vertically.

RVDT 4th June 2010 11:58


Are there any machines, other than Lynx, that have correlators from pedals to throttle/collective (governed or otherwise)?
Probably all with FADEC!

rick1128 4th June 2010 12:32

To be technically correct every Enstrom prior to the F28F/280F does not have a correlator. It is also the only piston helicopter currently in production that does not have an automatic mixture control, so you can lean the mixture during flight.

wulfman76 4th June 2010 14:54

Of the 4 hiller 12E's i've flown, all had correlators......none had governors....other than the soloy turbine conversions but thats a different story. As mentioned there is a box linked in to the collective and throttle cable. Locations vary by model but it is generally the size of a paperback book. The two both work towards the same goal but function differently and i think that may confuse some that are not familiar.

Governor senses RPM and adjusts automatically. Usually no manual throttle adjustment necessary.

correlator adjusts throttle based on the position of the collective. It gets the rpm in the ball park but manual throttle "fine tuning" is more or less required.

Graviman 4th June 2010 16:07


Originally Posted by chopjock
I design, build and fly UAVs. The tail rotor is correlated to the throttle. More left pedal, more throttle, less left pedal less throttle. We also correlate pitch and tail rotor, particularly useful when climbing and descending vertically.

Interesting activity, Chopjock. I'd like to learn more about this. I'm guessing this is electronic if you account for the TR power-airspeed curve? Which chip/software do you use BTW?

Agreed, RVDT. Talking to some of my colleagues with helicopter control system experience, it gets to the point that mechanical systems get so complicated that you start to wonder whether the FMEAs can account for all the linkages! Of course we all know that software never goes wrong. ;)

chriswhi 4th June 2010 19:51

Real men do not need correlator's !!!!

chopjock 4th June 2010 22:30

Graviman

Interesting activity, Chopjock. I'd like to learn more about this. I'm guessing this is electronic if you account for the TR power-airspeed curve? Which chip/software do you use BTW?
Yes electronic fly by wire servo system. Adjustment and set up by mark one eyeball.:)

brett s 4th June 2010 22:48

All of the Bell 47's & the one Hiller 12E I've flown had one. Some much better than others...

IFMU 5th June 2010 01:29

I learned to fly in an Enstrom F28A. No correlator. It was easy to learn, and I figure if I can learn it anybody can. It became very natural to twist the grip as I pulled or dropped collective, also had to pull in a little more for a left pedal turn and roll a bit out for a right. I do agree there was no automatic mixture control though we always left it rich and stayed low. I have a little time in a Schweizer 300CBi, and that sure looked like a manual mixture control to me. I'll check with one of my buddies and report back if I'm wrong.

-- IFMU


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:43.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.