PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Robinson R66 (merged threads) (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/266788-robinson-r66-merged-threads.html)

120torque 31st December 2007 10:22

Air intake
 
Any idea how enough air gets into the compressors ? i think all other turbine heli's i've seen have air intakes - normally toward the front - and i've always been told if these get blocked it stops! I assume the small vents on the back are possibly the air intake and mean you dont fly forward - just backward?
:confused:

Graviman 31st December 2007 11:03

MJB, increased clearance will help reduce risk of bladestrike, so may also have been a factor.

120, air intakes are at the root of the tail boom. The RR300 may not have been optimised to make use of the dynamic pressure from forward facing inlets in cruise. Normally this would be accomplished with moveable stators at inlet of an axial compressor, but this unit has a centrifugal. I'm planning to read up a lot more on gas turbine design in the future.

helicopter-redeye, is there another name for "chadwickomiter"? I gather this would be some instrumentatiun to measure flapwise movement of blade?

Actually the vertical stabiliser, and blade just above it in photo, appear to have a network of strain guages over them to determine in flight loads. That most likely means this R44 based powertrain prototype is flying R66 rotors and tail fins. Looking at details like the aerofoil section skid struts, this machine is aimed at a good cruise speed.

mickjoebill 31st December 2007 11:47

bystander blast
 
Will jet blast have a distinctive effect to a bystander (it being so close to ground level) or will it mix with down wash?


Also in a typical testing programme (at this stage) would an enlargement of the cabin have to be based on the length of the cabin in the test ship with only way of increasing capacity by width extension, or can the cabin be lengthened?

Could this testing be applied to a completely new cabin?




Mickjoebill

EN48 31st December 2007 13:00

Anyone know how engine power is transmitted to the main rotor? Could it be a similar belt setup to the R44?

EN

helicopter-redeye 31st December 2007 14:40


helicopter-redeye, is there another name for "chadwickomiter"? I gather this would be some instrumentatiun to measure flapwise movement of blade?
Sorry, try Model 2000 Balancer System (Chadwick) part number KI-68. Used in blade tracking/ balancing. The wire attaches to a 'sort of osciliscope' that will be in the cab. I can't see it entering via the door cowls (usual approach) so it may be "permanently fitted" and wired through the roof light.

IF this is what the device and wire/ tape is for then I guess the engineers would be looking for any blade tracking deviations in certain manoeuvers.

h-r (CDT)

Nubian 31st December 2007 14:41

Jetblast
 
If this would be the final design of the R-66 (which I seriously doubt) it would not be the first helicopter with its "smoke-stacks" close to the ground. There are quite a few 500's out there, high or low-skid and there seems not to be of any problems as long as you stay away from the area under the tail-cone (which should be avoided in ANY case, as there are more imminent dangers there!!!) The enstrom 480, and Schweizer 330-series helicopters also has the pipes under the tail and haven't heard of anyone yet, with "jetblast" injuries.

This is most likely only the testbed for the engine that they have desided to go for in the new aircraft.

chuckolamofola 1st January 2008 07:10


IF this is what the device and wire/ tape is for then I guess the engineers would be looking for any blade tracking deviations in certain manoeuvers.
That's the magnetic pickup. It's used for determining rotor azimuth (clock angle), rotor speed and triggering the strobe if used.

Chuck

mickjoebill 1st January 2008 08:46

Crystal balls
 

That's the magnetic pickup. It's used for determining rotor azimuth (clock angle), rotor speed and triggering the strobe if used
Can you draw any conclusions from the use of this type of test equipment re the purpose of the flight?
Some are saying the craft is a test bed for the engine and not necessarily anything to do with final layout for the airframe.


Mickjoebill

Graviman 2nd January 2008 13:49

Thanks, helicopter-redeye - this system looks nicely automated:
http://www.e-equipments.com/vibrex2000.htm
http://www.e-equipments.com/images/v2000plus-title.jpeg
Some interesting discussions going on here about instrumentation techniques. :ok:


MJB, regarding cabin size increase the CG will have been carefully calculated. This machine will have been designed as a prototype using the R66 powertrain, but adapted to an R44 testbed. You will probably find that that the prototype has been massed up to replicated the likely R66 weight (depending on test requirement). This just allows the design engineers to gain confidence in their components/systems, by accumulating some hours before the proper R66 airframe is tested.

I imagine there was a detailed R66 concept evaluation before even starting the powertrain evaluation prototype design. Most likely RHC have done extensive wind tunnel or CFD work and have a very good idea of drag coefficients and cruising speed. I would have though they opted for 3 in the back as a good packaging compromise. From memory a "tadpole" shape with 2.4:1 length:width offers the lowest fuselage Cd. Once the flight testing has proven out the R66 powertrain, you will likely see a prototype with the intended R66 fuselage.

Doing it in small stages is the sign of a well run test/development program...

Ken Wells 8th January 2008 19:08

R66
 
According to Robo mole this will be a 5 seater 3 in the back

chopper2004 17th January 2008 08:27

I guess I'll see it in a few weeks in Heli Expo Houston;)

mickjoebill 29th April 2008 09:56

R66 test flight video
 
Note sure if this has been linked, I assume it is genuine despite not hearing much turbine music...

R66 test flight.. the first?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gMM7jl_smw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO1kx...eature=related


Mickjoebill

Gordy 29th April 2008 12:21

Rumor has it that it crashed yesterday doing H/V testing..Just a rumor though.

Scissorlink 29th April 2008 22:30

A Robinson product crashing, now there is a real surprise

Gaseous 29th April 2008 22:37

They got to test every aspect of its future training role.

On a more serious note, if it did, hope the pilot's OK.

Graviman 30th April 2008 11:39

Are there any precautions taken during HV testing?
I imagine there are at least hand calcs done to estimate the corner points first.

Elan Head 6th June 2008 04:20

R66 photos
 
Does anyone out there own the copyright to some good, high-res photos of the R66? Please PM me if you do.

Elan

Freewheel 6th June 2008 05:10

I'm going to sound like a smartarse here - without really meaning to I might add - but......


The only people likely to have good enough access to an R66 to get good, high res pictures are those within Robinson.

Give 'em a try, you never know.

Otherwise, does it have to happen right now?

Elan Head 6th June 2008 09:17

My understanding is that Robinson is not releasing R66 photos itself, but is not working too hard to prevent others from taking them. Am happy to be corrected on this.

Elan

Runway101 7th June 2008 20:41

Since Torrance is a public airport you can walk to the ramp and take pictures.


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:21.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.