PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Enstrom Down? (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/155842-enstrom-down.html)

oldbeefer 15th December 2004 21:38

Enstrom Down?
 
Midlands News showed what looked like an Enstrom which had force landed in a field near Shrewsbury. anyone anymore details?

SASless 15th December 2004 21:42

Must be an area of intense gravity near Shrewsbury....a Squirrel and now an Enstrom!

goaround7 16th December 2004 08:08

Same machine ? An Enstrom looks a lot like a Squirrel from a distance...

Bomber ARIS 16th December 2004 08:17

....especially when it's f**ked!!

http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/u...helicopter.jpg

versus

http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/u...elicopter1.jpg

Edited to play spot the difference

helicopter-redeye 16th December 2004 08:36

It has roundels. Do the RAF/ DFTS fly Enstroms ??

quichemech 16th December 2004 08:55

It's a single squirrel by the look of it and it heavy landed according to the local news at an Army barracks in Shropshire.

See the post about the 350 incident.

Phoenix Rising 16th December 2004 09:30

quichemech - Heavy landing - that would be an understatement looking at whats left of it :eek:

:E

Steve76 16th December 2004 09:46

Lick of paint and she'll be right.
I think you would want to have been wearing your helmet in that one.

oldbeefer 16th December 2004 10:15

No, I know about the Squirrel. The item on local news showed what looked like a white/red Enstrom being towed out of a field on the outskirts of Shrewsbury.

Whirlybird 16th December 2004 11:42

I haven't heard anything, but there is a privately owned Enstrom based near Shrewsbury; it drops into Sleap for fuel fairly regularly. I don't know if that's the one though.

rotorboater 16th December 2004 11:58

Enstrom Down

Details on Enstrom crash - light injury only luckilly.

Gaseous 16th December 2004 21:12

If this is Staurts machine and I think it is. it is G-BAAU. From the picture it looks possibly repairable. Thank goodness he's OK.

quichemech 16th December 2004 21:14

V sorry, had only heard of the one accident on local news, can see where similarities exist in looks when they are smacked up.:eek:

Hilico 10th November 2005 17:16

AAIB Report
 
Link to AAIB report issued Nov 2005, here.

Head Turner 17th November 2005 11:37

So he ran out of fuel, a costly mistake. I cant believe that the pilot would have know at the outset what fuel he needed for the flight and refuelled accordingly. Is there a 'low fuel warning light' on this model helicopter, I'm sure there is.

Thomas coupling 17th November 2005 11:55

Sounds to me like an amateur. Running out of fuel:mad:

I love it when the papers say the brave pilot steered the stricken craft away from the women and children playing innocently in the gardens etc etc (some artistic licence there sorry!).

Bottom line in these instances is:

OOooooooooooooh Jesus Chr*st I'm going to die if there isn't a field under me - lower the lever and PRAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY.

All in all he's lucky he's not up on a manslaughter charge.

Gaseous 17th November 2005 19:26

HT.

No, there is no low fuel light. The fuel gauges on aircraft of this age are generally crap. I have drained the tanks dry (on the ground!) and seen 1/4 full still on the gauge. It had been 'calibrated' within the past year to comply with the AD.

The fuel flow gauge is nearly always as bad. I'm not defending running out of fuel. Basic fuel calculations show that this flight was just not on.
However: He was a low hour pilot and likely as not believed what the instruments were telling him. A costly mistake indeed, but in my opinion one that should not be possible.

The regulatory system in this godforsaken country makes it nearly impossible to fit decent instruments. I know. I have tried.

Ok, dipping, a calculator and half a brain works for me, but this is the 21st century. It is not unreasonable to expect instruments that are accurate.

Its time that old aircraft - and not just helicopters, were allowed to be upgraded. Inaccurate instruments are worse than none at all.

The safety regulators should be constructive, not obstructive. They may find that approach actually prevents accidents.

clicker 17th November 2005 21:18

Yes the report is worth reading, first reaction was to say "silly fool" or similar but when you see the facts you can understand why it happened.

Sewing Machine Man 22nd November 2005 09:54

I’m amazed that there are little or no warnings for low fuel. I would have thought there would have been horns, bells and whistles blowing “DANGER DANGER LAND NOW” Also would the pilot not be aware that something was amiss due to excessive aft cyclic to compensate for the loss of fuel weight.

And why wont the authorities allow an upgrade? I would imagine it not making a huge difference to the maximum take off weight or c of g.

Mike.. Not a pilot, but a big, above average enthusiast , hope I’m still welcome after that confession..

NickLappos 22nd November 2005 10:29

Lack of flow information? Poor gauge? Poor warning light? Still no excuse, in the end. Your fuel state is the second most important thing in your helo, after your rotor rpm, and about even with your altitude.

To misjudge is one thing, to run out of gas while fat and happy in cruise is neglegant to the extreme. On one model piston, with notoriously bad gauges, I simply punched the clock. At 1 hr 30 minutes, I would be on the ground, "one way or the other," my instructor said. I listened!


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:23.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.