AW139 unexpected float deployment
|
If I remember rightly, the 139 floats are immersion activated with manual back up. My money on collective F up.
|
Originally Posted by Sir Korsky
(Post 11369825)
If I remember rightly, the 139 floats are immersion activated with manual back up. My money on collective F up.
|
Originally Posted by Nescafe
(Post 11369933)
Activation from the collective mounted switch requires a three stage action, arm floats, lift the collective switch guard then press the button. If the floats are armed, the ‘float test’ button being pressed inadvertently, (by a flight board or iPad etc) would also make the circuit, which could be more likely.
|
Originally Posted by gwelo shamwari
(Post 11371555)
Pressing the test button with the floats armed does not cause them to inflate.
|
Originally Posted by Non-PC Plod
(Post 11371569)
Yes- hopefully. However there must be a reason for the limitation: "Do not activate the test switch in flight"..............!
A wiring short under the baggage bay floor. There was a mod to increase the clearance around the cylinder firing heads. |
Originally Posted by ericferret
(Post 11371963)
I seem to recall a similar incident with a UK registered aircraft. A wiring short under the baggage bay floor. There was a mod to increase the clearance around the cylinder firing heads.
https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExte...5004BDBCB.0001 |
Always thought the Agusta SOP of flying over water with floats armed was superior and a natural evolution over the old S76 (and others) restriction of limiting arming by airspeed. We blew lots of floats in the 76 at 140 knots with only embarrassment as a consequence. After we got the belly sensors to auto inflate all we really needed was a guard on the manual activation button on the cyclic, that alas never came.
Glad Agusta never backpedaled on SOP after the first few inadvertent float deployments. |
Uncommanded float activation
Not sure how common this is but I overheard that a Middle East Gulf operator has had 4 unexpected activations this year alone. CHC apparently had multiple last year too.
I wonder if MX has anything to do with the number of unexpected activations as the operators I have flown for never had a single one with hundreds of thousands of operating hours? Is there anywhere where this information is available for analysis? |
How pricey would something like this be though? (an inadvertent deployment)
I've seen videos of people inflating these floats for fun, once their useable lifespan is consumed... |
the 'traditional' dropping of the iPad on the unguarded float switch was a $60k FU on the S76 - to give you some idea. Squibs ain't cheap.
|
We blew lots of floats in the 76 at 140 knots with only embarrassment as a consequence 'traditional' dropping of the iPad on the unguarded float switch was a $60k FU on the S76 |
Glad to hear that Megan. You must have been around far smarter folk than I've been used to ! :O
|
Originally Posted by gwelo shamwari
(Post 11424376)
Not sure how common this is but I overheard that a Middle East Gulf operator has had 4 unexpected activations this year alone. CHC apparently had multiple last year too.
I wonder if MX has anything to do with the number of unexpected activations as the operators I have flown for never had a single one with hundreds of thousands of operating hours? Is there anywhere where this information is available for analysis? Records show 2 inflight float deployments in the last 3 years and that includes the recent one in Brazil. That is across all Leonardo aircraft types. 109/119, 139, 169 and 189. I can't find any records for unintentional float operation on the ground in that time frame. Normally the OEM would at least be told and also regulatory authority, IF it was a problem with an aircraft system. |
I am a bit sceptical at the claim of so many unintentional/unexpected deployments.
Where exactly did you check? it would interesting to have a look at what is actually happening to the fleet. |
Originally Posted by gwelo shamwari
(Post 11429539)
I am a bit sceptical at the claim of so many unintentional/unexpected deployments.
Where exactly did you check? it would interesting to have a look at what is actually happening to the fleet. |
Originally Posted by albatross
(Post 11429697)
I have heard of. a lot on 76s over the years. More than one occurred on hand over of controls for a deck landing. One poor fellow was present at 2 in 4 months. Forever after he lived with the nickname “Pops”. One thing we discovered was that the red button on the cyclic, which all thought required a good hard push, would activate at the merest touch.
|
There have been many inadvertent 76 float deployments, probably hundreds over the years. Usually on the deck after one pilot exits with the float switch still on. Many operators failed to install the STC float guard and fumbling on exit, or even getting the cyclic trim PB mixed up with the pop button set them off. Easy to do if you're stupid or tired. If the 139 system works as advertised, you should never have to manually activate the float switch.
|
|
The key lies in selling it as a functional test.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:22. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.