AW139 - SPIFR
Looks like the boss would like a little more headroom than our current 76 can offer and a 139 has made the short list.
Wondering, can an N-registered 139 operate SPVFR/SPIFR under Part135 operations? Or under Part 91 ? Assuming FMS Supp 22 is in play... Thanks |
Originally Posted by overtorqued
(Post 11127668)
Looks like the boss would like a little more headroom than our current 76 can offer and a 139 has made the short list.
Wondering, can an N-registered 139 operate SPVFR/SPIFR under Part135 operations? Or under Part 91 ? Assuming FMS Supp 22 is in play... Thanks |
Originally Posted by Sir Korsky
(Post 11127698)
... I don't see any issues flying it single driver...
|
Originally Posted by gulliBell
(Post 11127846)
Exactly. Especially when two pilots are perfectly capable of dropping a perfectly good 139 into the sea....
|
Originally Posted by overtorqued
(Post 11127668)
Looks like the boss would like a little more headroom than our current 76 can offer and a 139 has made the short list.
Wondering, can an N-registered 139 operate SPVFR/SPIFR under Part135 operations? Or under Part 91 ? Assuming FMS Supp 22 is in play... Thanks Check PM's |
Originally Posted by overtorqued
(Post 11127668)
Looks like the boss would like a little more headroom than our current 76 can offer and a 139 has made the short list.
Wondering, can an N-registered 139 operate SPVFR/SPIFR under Part135 operations? Or under Part 91 ? Assuming FMS Supp 22 is in play... Thanks What's your insurance company think? IMHO. |
Originally Posted by donut king
(Post 11137300)
if one is new on type......DO NOT ATTEMPT! Especially SPIFR. I've done SPVFR for maintenance and ferry flights (1500hrs on type). always dual pilot with night/IFR/Offshore/HEMS.
What's your insurance company think? IMHO. |
Originally Posted by overtorqued
(Post 11127668)
Looks like the boss would like a little more headroom than our current 76 can offer and a 139 has made the short list.
Wondering, can an N-registered 139 operate SPVFR/SPIFR under Part135 operations? Or under Part 91 ? Assuming FMS Supp 22 is in play... Thanks Section 1, Limitations. Minimum crew for IFR in FAA land is two. Section 5, Supplement 22, IFR Single Pilot Operations. In nice big letters. NOT FAA APPROVED. Single Pilot VFR in FAA land, yes. But only if Supplement 32 is followed. |
I've always said SPIFR is fine...until something goes wrong. In all the years I did training and checking on the 139 ( and others) when faced with an unexpected emergency/failure of a critical system at a critical flight stage the work load increases to a level that goes beyond what most SP's can deal with.
I'm with the FAA on this one..... |
Originally Posted by Outwest
(Post 11139273)
I've always said SPIFR is fine...until something goes wrong. In all the years I did training and checking on the 139 ( and others) when faced with an unexpected emergency/failure of a critical system at a critical flight stage the work load increases to a level that goes beyond what most SP's can deal with.
I'm with the FAA on this one..... |
FAA licensed pilots are required to demonstrate SP competency to have their licences not have a SIC only restriction on initial endorsement, but I can't say for certain if thats required annually.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:11. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.