Bell 505 Maintenance
Anyone have any idea what the scheduled maintenance is on these machines? Major component times? Are there any calendar items?
|
Hi
I can help you with that, send me a dm and I will forward what you need |
Originally Posted by rotorfun
(Post 10921527)
Anyone have any idea what the scheduled maintenance is on these machines? Major component times? Are there any calendar items?
|
Anyone had a problem with the 505 tail rotor control cable pulley? My port aft has just cr@ped out on me. Any advice appreciated.
|
apparently I must send 8 posts before I am allowed to attach an image. So...
|
33333.
|
44444.
|
55555.
|
66666.
|
77777.
|
88888.
|
|
Fit a new pulley and soldier on. |
The 505 wasn't modelled as a progression from the B206 "Jet Ranger".
To me it looks like they used the B47J "Ranger" as a starting point? All steel tube and screws. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....7f8f51eda4.jpg |
505 from 47J
To right regarding the J as the original! That pulley looks very much like what is on the 47. What's the part number?
|
Heh. When I first saw the 505 with its steel tube frame covered by sheet metal, I thought to myself how similar it was to things that Bell had built before. Like the 47J. I laughed and thought, "This thing is just a gussied-up J-model!" Only uglier. Way, waaaaay uglier. And let's not forget, in 1962, Bell built a J-model with a turbine engine! That would be the HUL-1M, powered by the (then) 250 h.p. Allison 250 engine. Okay, but,..but...the 505 is such a great leap forward in "technology." Right. Like, uhhh, what sort of new tech? Oh yeah, it's got FADEC on the French engine. Aaaaaand...hmm...what else? Well, at least it's got a flat floor! Man, when it comes to helicopters, there is really very little "new" under the sun.
|
Originally Posted by FH1100 Pilot
(Post 11619874)
Heh. When I first saw the 505 with its steel tube frame covered by sheet metal, I thought to myself how similar it was to things that Bell had built before. Like the 47J. I laughed and thought, "This thing is just a gussied-up J-model!" Only uglier. Way, waaaaay uglier. And let's not forget, in 1962, Bell built a J-model with a turbine engine! That would be the HUL-1M, powered by the (then) 250 h.p. Allison 250 engine. Okay, but,..but...the 505 is such a great leap forward in "technology." Right. Like, uhhh, what sort of new tech? Oh yeah, it's got FADEC on the French engine. Aaaaaand...hmm...what else? Well, at least it's got a flat floor! Man, when it comes to helicopters, there is really very little "new" under the sun.
|
Originally Posted by FH1100 Pilot
(Post 11619874)
Heh. When I first saw the 505 with its steel tube frame covered by sheet metal, I thought to myself how similar it was to things that Bell had built before. Like the 47J. I laughed and thought, "This thing is just a gussied-up J-model!" Only uglier. Way, waaaaay uglier. And let's not forget, in 1962, Bell built a J-model with a turbine engine! That would be the HUL-1M, powered by the (then) 250 h.p. Allison 250 engine. Okay, but,..but...the 505 is such a great leap forward in "technology." Right. Like, uhhh, what sort of new tech? Oh yeah, it's got FADEC on the French engine. Aaaaaand...hmm...what else? Well, at least it's got a flat floor! Man, when it comes to helicopters, there is really very little "new" under the sun.
|
Originally Posted by FH1100 Pilot
(Post 11619874)
Heh. When I first saw the 505 with its steel tube frame covered by sheet metal, I thought to myself how similar it was to things that Bell had built before. Like the 47J. I laughed and thought, "This thing is just a gussied-up J-model!" Only uglier. Way, waaaaay uglier. And let's not forget, in 1962, Bell built a J-model with a turbine engine! That would be the HUL-1M, powered by the (then) 250 h.p. Allison 250 engine. Okay, but,..but...the 505 is such a great leap forward in "technology." Right. Like, uhhh, what sort of new tech? Oh yeah, it's got FADEC on the French engine. Aaaaaand...hmm...what else? Well, at least it's got a flat floor! Man, when it comes to helicopters, there is really very little "new" under the sun.
|
There's nothing digital about an autorotation (yet). I trust the tubes & wires any day on a 47, a Lama or a 500 to keep me in one piece during an unanticipated landing over an android operated system or some composite. Horses for courses I guess.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:45. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.