Excellent post Winfield83, thank you!
|
Excellent observation, but remind me, wasn't this an almost brand new helicopter with a couple of hundred hours total time? In which case most unlikely anything on it was worn out.
|
This was a fairly new machine with less than 300 hours
I am sure the factory would have assembled it properly If it turns out some component in the TR drive was not assembled properly or tightened properly it most likely happened during disassembly & reassembly when it was shipped overseas. That is my guess anyway. |
The tubes and sometimes bush asembly can wear quite a bit and should be inspected closely during routine maintenance, particularly when operating in dusty environments. Add in to that some young hopper (or old...... some just never grow out of it) going from one control stop to the next in their own dust and using a multitude more inputs than necassary, than an already prone bearing surface will have an even rougher ride.
I would think though, that excessive wear to the point a failure of a tube or guide would occur, would more likely lead to jammed pedals rather than a complete control failure/disconnect. Very unlikely also in such a low houred aircraft. Also, a complete control disconnect should have no affect on the teetering of the tail rotor and should not lead to a blade striking the tail. Definitely lead to a few other problems but I wouldn't think that would be one of them. Anyway, I'm teetering on the edge of speculation and that's something I try not to do before the ATSB has done their thing. A sad tragedy whatever the cause. |
ATSB Final Report
|
|
So just a freak accident, that no-one could have anticipated! :ugh:
Obviously surveillance must be improved, with more of these types of operators removed from the airspace ASAP. Before innocent casualties become involved as they were in this case. Very sad. The trust betrayal of the passengers and the young girls parents is disturbing, and potentially speaks volumes regarding the pilots personality. |
I got to thinking...
1) Low-time machine and the tail rotor comes off? ATSB cannot find a definitive cause? 2) You know how we always caution pilots to operate the helicopter within limits so something doesn't break on the next pilot? Maybe this guy was a victim of...well..himself. Maybe he was his own "next pilot." The ATSB cast aspersions on him, noting all the other incidents and accidents his helicopters have been involved in. Add to that the fact that he was technically not legal to fly, which demonstrates a certain casualness with rule-following. We might infer that this casualness carried over into how he operated the ship. Perhaps he was not diligent about observing power limits while at the same time being more rough on the pedals than is necessary? We don't know what he did with that R-44 in the 280 hours he flew it, but I'll bet it was used and abused. Maybe this guy did it to himself? Maybe he was used to horsing those things around? His history certainly hints at this. 3) Here's one amazing tidbit from the investigation: While there was a large shift forward in centre of gravity it is highly likely that VH‑NBY’s centre of gravity remained within limits following the in-flight break-up. I've never been an outright Robbie-hater, and my respect for the R-44 has grown with this accident. |
I've been an R22 hater but have no gripe with the R44 apart from that rotor design.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.