PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   NPAS News 2018 (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/613682-npas-news-2018-a.html)

MightyGem 28th May 2018 17:42

Some good(?) stuff here on NPAS in May's Police Aviation News:
http://www.policeaviationnews.com/Ac...PANMay2018.pdf

SilsoeSid 30th May 2018 09:56

(page 9)
Actually, WMAO was the first (UK Police) P2 to be purchased :ok:

ShyTorque 20th Jul 2018 09:40

Is there any update on NPAS's Vulcanair P68 fixed wing? The hangar was competed a long time ago, but nothing has been seen operating from Doncaster as yet.

Did they do a landaway and are still looking for AVGAS?

Thomas coupling 20th Jul 2018 19:36

They don't meet the op requirements apparently. Can't put them into service due to their fuel load and endurance.
Millions down the drain.

MightyGem 20th Jul 2018 20:22


They don't meet the op requirements apparently. Can't put them into service due to their fuel load and endurance.
Millions down the drain.
It beggars belief if that is true.

I hear that NPAS have decided that civilian TFOs are no longer a good idea. They get paid more or less the same as a PC and don't "think" like a bobby on the ground does.

Rumour also has it that there is a contingency plan to go down to 5 "priority" bases in the event that serviceability falls below a certain level.

Non-PC Plod 21st Jul 2018 16:46

"I have to point out that the money certainly did not go down the drain!

Obviously it went into someone's pocket, and Air Support got nothing to show for it."


How very......African? Not really how we expect contracts to work in UK!

ShyTorque 21st Jul 2018 17:11


Originally Posted by Thomas coupling (Post 10201821)
They don't meet the op requirements apparently. Can't put them into service due to their fuel load and endurance.
Millions down the drain.

Is that confirmed as true?

Funny old thing...what were some of us saying at the start? :ugh:

PANews 21st Jul 2018 20:29

If it is true that the P68 does not meet requirements there is a conundrum in that it has passed the EASA FIKI.

If it has FIKI I would assume it meets all aspects....and yet the suggestion [well much more than that] is that there is an element of the flight envelope it does not meet.

So a suspicion is emerging that face saving might be the order of the day.

As FIKI is a small part of the mission there is at least a possibility that the aircraft could enter service and do most of the mission and thereby avoid entering the 'missing' parameter. Avoid flying on damp and cold winter days and nights.

That would save face and it is unlikely to emerge for a few years in which time a replacement airframe might be acquired.

I accept this theory is full of holes but on one hand I understood that there was not a snowballs chance of it meeting the spec and yet another source has suggested that it will enter service later in the summer.

Thomas coupling 21st Jul 2018 22:38

They're fitting bigger fuel tanks.

Fly_For_Fun 22nd Jul 2018 10:01


They're fitting bigger fuel tanks.
I take it that there are no issues with maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) and maximum landing weight (MLW)?

PANews 22nd Jul 2018 11:33

They are micromanaging the crew, shorter, leaner......

misterbonkers 22nd Jul 2018 13:00

This thread is like reading the daily mash

Thomas coupling 23rd Jul 2018 09:38

And to make matters worse: The aircraft don't seem to meet the EASA minimum rate of climb requirements for OEI.
They could always use them as temporary portacabins I guess.

ShyTorque 23rd Jul 2018 11:37

What a calamity - and they can't claim they weren't told this couldn't work.

tigerfish 24th Jul 2018 11:49

Its been a total cluster**** from start to finish! They refused to listen to those of us who were saying that they were working from a flawed principle back in 2010, and they continued to work from their flawed plan ever since. The whole concept of the successful years prior to 2010 was to get the asset overhead the scene of the crime or incident, within 10-15 minutes so that there was a good chance of making a difference to the outcome. 33 aircraft operating from 27 bases provided that possibility, and perhaps even more importantly gave the hard pressed guys & gals on the ground additional confidence. The public also, were re assured that the Police were there to protect them, and the helicopter overhead was a symbol of that presence.

Today with the fleet down to just a few aircraft, that almost instantaneous presence overhead almost never happens. The distances to travel are just too great and the deterrent factor has been lost. Any Practical Police Officer with experience of what was needed to produce a good TFO would have told you, that they needed to be an experienced Police Officer with an in depth knowledge of their area. It is true that they needed to be a proven thief catcher and possessed the character to do that from the air. There could never be any real savings from training a civilian to do the job because the skills and abilities required demanded a salary very similar to that of a mid service PC. The loss of flexibility was actually a negative factor.

The NPAS disaster was bound to happen as it has. The report that gave it life was written by someone with no knowledge of what had made UK Police Air Support into the the most effective operational tool that it was. It could have been made better by centralised command and control delivered on a Regional basis to ensure wide cover of the asset. There were huge savings to be made from centralised training, Insurance and maintenance contracts. Standardisation of aircraft too!
But no the only mantra to be followed was that of cutting slashing and burning all that had been achieved. The Concept of air SUPPORT was forgotten. The idea of being able to identify and pinpoint the criminal was no longer important, - just save money.

Sadly today, because the Police Service has been almost withdrawn from our lives the criminal has realised that there is nothing to stop him anymore and he is free to do what he wants! Driving standards have plummeted because there is no one stopping and advising. Violent crime is rapidly increasing, again who is there to stop them? We lost it, - because no one could see the folly of the Mantra "Just save money , nothing else matters". NPAS epitomises that thought process.

airpolice 24th Jul 2018 12:39

Tigerfish, you have summed it up well.

What IMHO also needs said is that as a taxpayer, I am inclined to think that what has been done to Air Support, is not all bad.

Even if you ignore the effects of the Banking Bastards having the country over a barrel, the public purse is not a magic money tree. We need value for money, and through no fault of the troops, the money spent on the ASU was not providing that.

Conviction rates and more importantly, sentencing policy, has undermined the Police Service, and eroded respect for law and order. To use a helicopter, a dozen cops, a dog and damage two Volvo estates, in order to apprehend a scrote who is back out to re offend on the same day, and nine months later gets a suspended sentence or Community Service Order, is piss poor value. When the courts are going to let them straight back out to do it again, instead of locking them up for five years, why bother?

tigerfish 24th Jul 2018 13:44

AirPolice, I understand where you are coming from, and in many ways I too despair at the weak sentencing policies, that have resulted in a situation where crime is encouraged to foster. But there is a deeper picture to bear in mind, if we keep stopping and arresting those blighters that were damaging that Volvo, sooner or later they will get the message or get locked up. The only way of stemming the current crime wave, especially Violent crime, is to increase the arrest and detection rate! The Criminal has cottoned on to the fact that more than ever before, he now has an open Goal, - today there is almost nothing and no-one to stop him, - the criminal currently has the freedom to operate with very little chance of being caught That simply has to change and change quickly.

This situation was brought about by Politicians who thought that as crime was going down a few years ago, they could remove most of the Policing that had achieved that, and that the Criminal would not notice that there was no policing any more!

TF

MightyGem 24th Jul 2018 21:03

In a nutshell, tigerish, in a nutshell.
:D :D

chopper2004 28th Jul 2018 09:18

Cambs happenings
 
As all knows that in Cambridge, the main Police station is closing in 3 years due to the cells are not up to Home Office Standards. No firm plans to where the new station will be relocated, one idea is to make do and share space with East of England Ambulance Service.

Anyhow in another post I mentioned GB Helicopters AS355F-NP with camera mount was up on thursday afternoon then returned to film over Cambridge as late as 2100 hours...which caused concern to local public due to it hovering over Parkside Police station thus automatically assumed it was one of NPAS's finest lol. i saw it fly over one's office space garden and hovering over city center (15 minute walk / 5 minute drive dependent on traffic jams).

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/839/2...8666d583_k.jpg

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/844/2...c2940102_k.jpg

Apparently according to Cambridge Evening News, the police spokeperson said it was pre arranged to hover over our lovely police station with permission and nothing to be alarmed about but no reason given...why it was above most of the day and night.

cheers

airpolice 28th Jul 2018 10:45


Apparently according to Cambridge Evening News, the police spokeperson said it was pre arranged to hover over our lovely police station with permission and nothing to be alarmed about but no reason given...why it was above most of the day and night.
That's serious endurance for an AS355 of any model.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.