Originally Posted by KiwiNedNZ
(Post 9542234)
.................. again from what I was told was benefits of having one manufacturer when it came to parts and logistics etc
|
Does it have a much better payload than C++? |
The ACs may have to be removed so the payload will match the C++........
|
Truth is Lockheed is trying to get rid of the parked D models by organizing raffles.
At least one of the launch customers has returned them and handed over the keys and are now flying the AW139. |
It's an old tart in a new dress.
|
In terms of the old tart in a new dress, I think the dress on C+ was a major improvement on C, and C++ refined it a little more. I never understood what Sikorsky were trying to achieve with the D, particularly if pitching it to offshore customers. More power is always good, but does the fancy avionics package in D get you around the patch any faster or safer than C++? Just trying to understand why an operator might decide to upgrade a C++ fleet to D, particularly with AW139 being an alternative in the market.
Esso Australia have just upgraded from six S76C to four AW139. Which is an upgrade equation I can understand. And the Macau operation changed from S76C+ to AW139, I can understand that also. But if C++ is your starting point I don't understand why you might want to change those for a D. |
Could be because TAS could not buy new C++īs , The C++īs they are flying now belong to CHC and now TAS will ( do) own there own D models.
Also as stated earlier they preferred to stay with one aircraft manufacturer, Sikorsky ( Lockheed Martin) for there fleet of S92A and S76D models. |
If you look at the ease of maintenance on a 76 to a 139, and the cost of maintenance on a 139 (ask anyone who works on both) then the 76 starts to look like the better option for a very busy offshore operator. I wouldnt be surprised if these become some of the highest time S76D in the world very quickly and i'm sure there'll be feedback soon.
|
Originally Posted by malabo
(Post 9541137)
I guess the days of hanging on to a CHC paintscheme for that offshore cred are gone :rolleyes:
|
Nice pics - March Calendar?
|
Originally Posted by Holy Moly
(Post 9658410)
Lately that old paint scheme just represents, lack of strategic planning and vision, general collapse, and execs absconding with millions. Massive re-branding is in order to 'run away' from the past as soon as possible. :ugh::uhoh::eek: The outfit that made out like a bandit was LENOVO...
Methinx that may be on the cards.... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:54. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.