PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Bye Bye Bond (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/576224-bye-bye-bond.html)

Heathcliff 31st Mar 2016 13:46

Why would they?

It may be half-baked to you, but it seems to have worked OK for us.

SFIM 31st Mar 2016 13:52


Why would they?
because you were a "team" 🤔

Heathcliff 31st Mar 2016 14:26

You're wilfully misunderstanding what I'm saying, but it doesn't really matter. Those who worked for old Bond will know how it was, as TeeS says. Sadly, the faceless corporate world is the future.

Rigga 31st Mar 2016 22:00

Even in my relatively short time at BAS I could see the movement from the family-run atmosphere and the slow transfer to a new 'corporate' image, to the one-size-fits-all conglomerate...

industry insider 25th Apr 2016 11:21

Well, today is the day in the UK and my early information was close but not quite right so here it is from Helihub:


  • Bond Aviation Group Ltd. to Babcock Mission Critical Services UK Ltd.
  • Bond Air Services Ltd. to Babcock Mission Critical Services Onshore Ltd.
  • Bond Offshore Helicopters Ltd to Babcock Mission Critical Services Offshore Ltd.
  • Bond Helicopters Europe Ltd. to Babcock Mission Critical Services Design and Completions Ltd.
  • International Aviation Leasing Ltd. to Babcock Mission Critical Services Leasing Ltd.

Over the years, there have been lots of corporate re-brand exercises, some more successful than others, this one doesn't have success written all over it.


From an ATC point of view, we understand that the “Bond” callsign and “BND” flight prefix are being retained due to the cost of changing it with ICAO.
I would change it to COC ;)

ScotiaQ 25th Apr 2016 12:45

I suppose it had to come but I have been involved with Bond since the mid 70s, it was NSH then. Through the years since then, I have worked in all areas of the Bond Group and thoroughly enjoyed it. A lot of years now and have subsequently retired.

As has been suggested in earlier posts, a lot of us went the extra mile, not necessarily for money but for the good of the Company, Job Security and yes, job satisfaction.While working for Bond, I never ,ever got up and thought "do I have to go to work today?" It was a good outfit to work for, in all areas and I was always well paid. Sad to see the name disappear along with the red colour scheme.

Also glad that I am retired.

bluesafari 25th Apr 2016 13:00

ScotiaQ, And very often some fun as well, great bunch of people to work with, Sounds like you and I must have joined NSH at the same time. But I've not retired yet.

griffothefog 25th Apr 2016 18:35

Started with NSH in 84, after crop spraying for 3 years and they gave me everything for free, twin rating, Instrument rating, and I repaid with 16 years of service. What a great family to work for and I spent many happy Years flying the first air ambulance in the uk and Trinity house in the late 80's with Geoff Bond who taught me so much.
Loved my time with Bond and a lot of it due to the foresight of Trevor Larman (wolfie) who's bark was worse than his bite 😜

cyclic 25th Apr 2016 21:17

My induction interview with TL probably broke every PC rule in the book - fantastic! Watching him ground run a 105 in his suit because I wasn't there when the engineers asked...

Thud_and_Blunder 26th Apr 2016 20:19


Unless you're ex ACC/RAF/RN don't even bother applying
Interesting opinion, johni - although as the ACC (Army Catering Corps) were subsumed into the RLC (Really Large Corps) (or was it the AGC (All Girls Corps?)) way back in the 1990s I shouldn't think there are many of them still around.

As for sticking with the known products of the military flying training system, I appreciate that this particular buoy has been rounded many times before, but have you considered that it may be down to the company's previous experiences of recruitment? It can take a lot of time and trouble to clear out mistakes made. Not that pilots from military backgrounds are necessarily guaranteed to be good, but their pasts are easier to put under the microscope.

During my always-interesting, professionally-rewarding and downright entertaining days with BAS, I found - as have many of the more-experienced correspondents above - that effort "in" was amply rewarded by loyalty "out". Not many employers would put a 57-year-old through a full IR, let alone do it all over again with another base pilot. Not to mention providing full TRI, IRI and TRE training to enable said 57-year-old to continue gainful employment within the industry. I wish all employees of BMCS(O) the very best of fortune for the future, and look forward to hearing how they continue to thrive in interesting times. With or without military backgrounds.

QTG 27th Apr 2016 11:37

"During my always-interesting, professionally-rewarding and downright entertaining days with BAS..........."

All very well Thud, but you still deserted them in their hour of need..........and to fly round in circles looking at bits of wire, of all things!

Thud_and_Blunder 27th Apr 2016 18:16

:) QTG

...BUT they'll doubtless thrive without me, and it's hard to turn down the opportunity to operate 9-to-5, Mon-Fri. Low-level ops, 700+ hours in the last 12 months - what's not to like?!

Rigga 28th Apr 2016 20:56

Well, I guess the operator formerly known as BAS (TOFKAB) now has a real excuse to buy larger aircraft.
They're going to have a real hard time getting all that name onto a 135!!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:08.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.