Originally Posted by AeroAmigo
(Post 11518192)
I don’t know how to explain it, but I think it looks ugly on the ground but beautiful and graceful in the air. Make of that what you will:O
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....d52d33251d.jpg (Spent way too much time!) |
Originally Posted by Tickle
(Post 11518377)
I know what you mean. They fixed it with the H160C update :)
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....d52d33251d.jpg (Spent way too much time!) |
Originally Posted by AeroAmigo
(Post 11518192)
I don’t know how to explain it, but I think it looks ugly on the ground but beautiful and graceful in the air. Make of that what you will:O
|
Originally Posted by Tickle
(Post 11518377)
I know what you mean. They fixed it with the H160C update :)
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....d52d33251d.jpg (Spent way too much time!) cheers |
Hey regular H160 fans! Still no HOGE charts to share? It'll be just our little secret...
|
Originally Posted by Phoinix
(Post 11541425)
Hey regular H160 fans! Still no HOGE charts to share? It'll be just our little secret...
|
TCCA Certification
|
Any news from the boys n girls flying the machine in warmer climes?
|
Originally Posted by Tatischeff
(Post 11489495)
I hope customers do these kind of calculations without waiting to have 2 finished machines ready to be delivered :rolleyes:
I carried out some “due diligence” in this respect on a particular airframe that came up for sale and discovered that it had apparently been flying with its first owner for two years with the C of G over 4” outside the aft limit! This made no sense whatsoever. I suggested the aircraft was re-weighed and discovered that the factory figures in the tech log were very much incorrect. Having done that and re-calculated, the actual C of G was actually right in the centre of the envelope. No harm done but it just shows that no one else had bothered to actually check the weight and balance, even at the factory. |
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
(Post 11553235)
I carried out some “due diligence” in this respect on a particular airframe that came up for sale and discovered that it had apparently been flying with its first owner for two years with the C of G over 4” outside the aft limit!
This made no sense whatsoever. I suggested the aircraft was re-weighed and discovered that the factory figures in the tech log were very much incorrect. Having done that and re-calculated, the actual C of G was actually right in the centre of the envelope. No harm done but it just shows that no one else had bothered to actually check the weight and balance, even at the factory. |
Swashplate Bearing AD - the fun starts
EASA AD H160B |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:46. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.