PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   UK SAR 2013 privatisation: the new thread (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/511282-uk-sar-2013-privatisation-new-thread.html)

minigundiplomat 19th Apr 2019 06:39

My money would be on Babcock - the company specialises in trousering UK tax receipts.

ShyTorque 19th Apr 2019 08:22


Originally Posted by jimf671 (Post 10450914)
Fascinating. Do you understand that the British military is so short staffed and desperate that they even employ me!

We had no idea things were so bad. :p

jimf671 19th Apr 2019 11:06


Originally Posted by minigundiplomat (Post 10450996)
My money would be on Babcock - the company specialises in trousering UK tax receipts.

The only one in the game that doesn't have an empty wallet?


Edit:

Or ....?

jimf671 19th Apr 2019 11:24

In November 2017, I posted the following elsewhere when the Bristow Group bean counter numbers did not make sense in relation to the proposed rollout on the ground.

"The key related element of the earnings presentation is the order book which for UK SAR shows 4 large rotorcraft delivered in SEPTEMBER 2019. In line with that revelation are statements about a wider deferment of capital expenditure on aircraft and the possibility of not making any money in the North Sea during some of the examined periods. ... ... Their capex deferment plan runs out to 2021 and if they can put four aircraft back two years then I suspect it is simply cheaper to pay a penalty than pay for the aircraft and pay for all the training conversion. These things don't get any cheaper as we move toward 2023, so it just gets worse and worse. The next contract probably considers contractor performance on previous contracts: black mark for not completing the promised aircraft provision."

Here we are in April 2019 and the four aircraft were transferred from Leonardo to Bristow some time ago and fleet deployment is days away from completion. Multiply that discrepancy out across the entire Bristow Group world and it turns into big bucks and big trouble.

Apate 19th Apr 2019 12:32

Does anyone actually know if the UK SAR contract has produced a profit when viewed in isolation, or is it simply a case of good cashflow that greases the wheels of a bankrupt company?

jimf671 19th Apr 2019 17:25


Originally Posted by Apate (Post 10451249)
Does anyone actually know if the UK SAR contract has produced a profit when viewed in isolation, or is it simply a case of good cashflow that greases the wheels of a bankrupt company?

A difficult question when viewing from the outside. Some suggest the AW189 delay may be partly supported by Leonardo but it's still quite likely the latter case is the reality up to this point. In a few months when CG151 is in place and the transition team are gone there should be a chance to make some money. It won't be huge though since a contract estimated at £2bn to £3.3bn for 14 or 15 aircraft that was awarded at £1.6bn after revising to 22 aircraft (incumbent's bid over 20% higher!) :ugh: isn't going to be plain sailing.

[email protected] 19th Apr 2019 18:09


Long stop position: just return SAR to the military and remove the commercial bean counter option that will never provide a viable service without risk.
Pedro 45 in 1968!
The military are so broke and the training system so slow that it would take another 10 years to make it happen.

Wind the clock back to when I was consistently flamed on PPrune for saying privatising UKSAR was a crap idea...............

500e 19th Apr 2019 20:45


Originally Posted by [email protected] (Post 10451432)
The military are so broke and the training system so slow that it would take another 10 years to make it happen.

Wind the clock back to when I was consistently flamed on PPrune for saying privatising UKSAR was a crap idea...............

But as you were told meany times it's a brave new world & will be alright




[email protected] 20th Apr 2019 10:05


But as you were told meany times it's a brave new world & will be alright
yes, that's going really well.....
Fortunately, the boys and girls on the front line are doing what they do best - just constantly let down by poor management.

Ed Winchester 20th Apr 2019 10:09


Originally Posted by [email protected] (Post 10451833)
yes, that's going really well.....
Fortunately, the boys and girls on the front line are doing what they do best - just constantly let down by poor management.

Which in itself bears a striking resemblance to the military :}

[email protected] 20th Apr 2019 11:36


Which in itself bears a striking resemblance to the military https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/badteeth.gif
yes, I almost put that in my previous post - didn't say the military was perfect but we could have achieved the same service if we had just been given new aircraft.

detgnome 20th Apr 2019 12:26

They would probably still be in the initial stages of evaluation at Boscombe....

Apate 20th Apr 2019 12:51


Originally Posted by jimf671 (Post 10451407)
A difficult question when viewing from the outside. Some suggest the AW189 delay may be partly supported by Leonardo but it's still quite likely the latter case is the reality up to this point. In a few months when CG151 is in place and the transition team are gone there should be a chance to make some money. It won't be huge though since a contract estimated at £2bn to £3.3bn for 14 or 15 aircraft that was awarded at £1.6bn after revising to 22 aircraft (incumbent's bid over 20% higher!) :ugh: isn't going to be plain sailing.

Thanks Jim. At least it should be very cash flow positive over the coming few years as the Capex will have all been covered.

jimf671 20th Apr 2019 21:28

With CHC as a recent bankrupt (And are they still holding the Black Spot?), and Babcock's parent worth the same two brass farthings as Bristow group, who you gonna call?

[email protected] 21st Apr 2019 06:09


They would probably still be in the initial stages of evaluation at Boscombe....
Not a process that is required to utilise civil aircraft on the military register.......

Sadly, the 'brave new world' still has donkeys leading the lions............

dingo9 21st Apr 2019 10:42


Originally Posted by Apate (Post 10451249)
Does anyone actually know if the UK SAR contract has produced a profit when viewed in isolation, or is it simply a case of good cashflow that greases the wheels of a bankrupt company?

this is a good point. Almost certainly there is no overall profit yet, still a great contract to have and as you say positive cash flow.
As for Bristow Helicopters Ltd being sold off, I wouldn’t have thought that Ch 11 conditions would allow this. The whole point in being granted Ch11 by a court is that it gives the company a chance to re pay debtors, therefore the judge will look very carefully at what parts of the company make money. The other complication of course is Ch11 is purely an American thing, UK SAR is under Bristow Helicopters Ltd and SAR does not have its own AOC. All makes for interesting viewing!

jimf671 21st Apr 2019 13:00

I still think that as far as UK SAR is concerned there is a good chance it will just blow over. The Americans will do what they have to do. BHL will keep cashing cheques from the DfT. Keep calm and carry on. Same as the CHC Ireland experience.

But that's for THIS contract. What happens when the DfT has to renew the contract (already working on it) and nobody with the technical ability to provide the service can demonstrate the financial competence they expect?

[email protected] 22nd Apr 2019 07:50

It would be interesting to see how a certain individual who was at the forefront of pushing the UKSAR model, and had visions of selling it to other nations, views his business plan now...........

jimf671 26th Apr 2019 01:32

Whatever happens in Houston, people will still get hauled out of the waters of the Minch and off rocky ledges in Kintail. I don't think anyone in an orange suit is worried about their job.

Meanwhile, there are more worries from ex-92 aircrew at Inverness about where to put everything in a 189! I expect airframes will be shuttled around the fleet in the next few days to get a couple of low hours ones up to Inverness. (You would, wouldn't you?) A week from now we'll have a completed roll-out of the original plan. It's taken a while.

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....917d4e8e66.jpg

snakepit 30th Apr 2019 09:45


Originally Posted by [email protected] (Post 10452989)
It would be interesting to see how a certain individual who was at the forefront of pushing the UKSAR model, and had visions of selling it to other nations, views his business plan now...........

In what way? As the total success it appears to be? Delivering the service, arguably better, on budget, despite OEM delays. Or are you suggesting he is in some way responsible for different business unit decisions that occur in Huston? That would be a like suggesting the SARF was actually a failure because of (for example) the total mismanagement of procurement in MOD.

As Jim says, people will keep getting rescued by the service. Nothing changes from military to civi SAR. Troops keep doing the job and continue to be baffled by either 2/3 star officers or SMT decisions. 😬


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:46.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.