Just the ticket..... You must have been taking the picture!
Beep beep: |
Just woke up to the dulcet tones of Jim Fergusson on Radio Scotland....ah bless him :cool:
|
You have to admit, he's got a regular gig.
|
Glad everyone is OK, wonder what the cause is this time?
|
Is Jim Fergusson to blame this time ??
|
All three operators have suspended flights of 225s and L2s - time to sell your EADS shares?
|
Mods
Shouldn't this thread be renamed "chc Helicopter ditching 22/10/12" to differentiate from the other 225 ditching threads? I |
Does Jim Ferguson get paid. If so, I may have to learn to spout @£$& too! :E
I haven't seen any crew names yet. Have they been released? Only ask as I used to know some of the guys up there. |
Shouldn't this thread be renamed "chc Helicopter ditching 22/10/12" to differentiate from the other 225 ditching threads? How many ditchings have we had on the North Sea this month? |
It didn't have the month on it when I posted. sasless
But we do seem to have a plethora . |
Well now.....I suppose it is time for HC to jump in here and tell us how superior the 225 is when compared to the 92.
In the past I posed the question re the design of the 225 MGB and whether there exists a design flaw that just does not pass muster. Have EC hung their Shoppo rouge on the wrong peg with this one? |
SASless
Well now.....I suppose it is time for HC to jump in here and tell us how superior the 225 is when compared to the 92. 3 ditchings in 8 years since first introduction in 2004. And Sikorsky will be welcome to join them because when you speak about MGB ...:bored: . |
We may call it now EC225 "Hydrocopter"
|
|
Floats work a treat in flat water don't they!
|
I suppose it is time for HC to jump in here and tell us how superior the 225 is when compared to the 92. We don't yet know what happened, but if it is the same as the last one, that is going to be pretty embarrassing for EC. In the past I posed the question re the design of the 225 MGB and whether there exists a design flaw that just does not pass muster |
a detail problem with the Bond ditching |
Floats work a treat in flat water don't they! |
"the shaft was left unsupported in the MGB". Correct me if I'm wrong (I usually am) but the schematic of the gearbox and bevel gear at the bottom of the shaft to engage with the oil pumps, in no way indicates that the loss of the bevel gear would leave the shaft unsupported. The weld holding the bevel gear to the shaft fractured and the gear dropped off the shaft. Shaft continued turning, fully supported by its bearings.
With any luck the latest ditching isn't due to the same cause, but due to loss of oil from somewhere else like a failed engine input seal. Hope it's nothing worse because I fly these truly delightful machines every working day from Aberdeen. |
What I was driving at was that there was a shaft (bevel gear drive shaft) in the MGB that was no longer connected and the exact position of the bearing supports isn't present on the schematic. It had failed below the bevel gear (the bevel gear was still connected to the shaft above the failure thank goodness) and in dropping, the lower part of the shaft had damaged one of the roller bearings and the gear teeth of the pumps. However, you are quite right that this may not have caused a further failure as all the debris was no longer being circulated by the oil. I just don't like the thought that the shaft that drives the whole thing had even the slightest potential to fail without other cause and we are then in the realms of experimental engineering. EC obviously have used this technique when it comes to the design and test of the Emergency Lube system as it was never fitted to a complete system before entering service.
I fly 'em as well but not every working day... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:11. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.