PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Bell 206 retractable gear: info please (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/425189-bell-206-retractable-gear-info-please.html)

oleary 25th Mar 2017 05:06

Inuvik about 1981
 
1 Attachment(s)
C-FAHX (originally Associated Heli) was one of the very first Sperry 212's. She lived in the Beaufort Sea for many years under OKie colours. When this was taken she was on contract to Imperial Oil.

We had switched to skids to sling an OKie 206 from the Firth River to YEV after an engine failure.

Problem was, when we got back to YEV no crane was available, so, .... good old Canadian ingenuity.

We cleverly put a barrel of fuel in the right two man to level her out. What we forgot to do was ground her. Many sparks when the cross tube brackets connected with the saddles.

Crew chief was Guy Murrison and meself was flying.

And yes, I did a (very fast) circuit.

John Eacott 25th Mar 2017 05:13

oleary, that must have taken some co-ordination to get the crosstubes in place: and how fast was 'fast'? ;)

http://www.eacott.com.au/gallery/d/8...ear+change.jpg

oleary 25th Mar 2017 05:21


Originally Posted by John Eacott (Post 9718508)
oleary, that must have taken some co-ordination to get the crosstubes in place: and how fast was 'fast'? ;)

Actually, it was surprisingly easy. Obviously the sling mirror wouldn't do it so we put a guy out front where I could see him to give me directions.

How fast was "fast"? Harold Baba didn't need to know. ;)

Outwest 25th Mar 2017 05:41

I see you say "one of" the very first Sperry 212's. I was always under impression that Bow had THE very first Sperry 212.

oleary 25th Mar 2017 05:57


Originally Posted by Outwest (Post 9718518)
I see you say "one of" the very first Sperry 212's. I was always under impression that Bow had THE very first Sperry 212.

Right you are, mate, C-FBHF.

When Okie bought Bow we inherited 4 x 212's. BHF (full Sperry), BHX (full Sperry), BHJ (Sperry but no FD) and BH(?) wrecked at Naskusp on a power line job before we got her.

Sadly, Fred and Jimmy smoked BHX on a night approach to Imperial Oil's Rig 3 NW of Tuk in about '83.

I have MANY hours in both of the HX's.

dusk2dawn 25th Mar 2017 09:36

Excuse my ignorance: if it wasn't Sperry what else would it be?
And "full" Sperry is with autopilot as opposed to just SAS/SCAS?

albatross 25th Mar 2017 12:26

Have time in both AHX and BHF.
Can't recall- AHX was a single Batt switch - but was BHF also?
Always funny when someone engaged the autopilot without centering the heading bug...LOL

Outwest 25th Mar 2017 14:00


Originally Posted by dusk2dawn (Post 9718683)
Excuse my ignorance: if it wasn't Sperry what else would it be?
And "full" Sperry is with autopilot as opposed to just SAS/SCAS?

It would be a Bell IFR machine.....the one with the big fin on the roof.

oleary 25th Mar 2017 16:56


Originally Posted by albatross (Post 9718814)
Have time in both AHX and BHF.
Can't recall- AHX was a single Batt switch - but was BHF also?
Always funny when someone engaged the autopilot without centering the heading bug...LOL

Yes it was. All the 212s up to SN 724 (I think) were single batt.

The heading function was pretty abrupt all right. That's why we didn't use the VOR/ILS capture function, it would scare the pax. Early FD days for sure.

oleary 25th Mar 2017 17:00


Originally Posted by dusk2dawn (Post 9718683)
Excuse my ignorance: if it wasn't Sperry what else would it be?
And "full" Sperry is with autopilot as opposed to just SAS/SCAS?

The "full" Sperry was Heli 1 & 2 plus Flight Director (autopilot). Some aircraft (BHJ) just had Heli 1 & 2 but no Flight Director.

albatross 25th Mar 2017 20:45


Originally Posted by oleary (Post 9718998)
Yes it was. All the 212s up to SN 724 (I think) were single batt.

The heading function was pretty abrupt all right. That's why we didn't use the VOR/ILS capture function, it would scare the pax. Early FD days for sure.

Once we got the sensitivity adjusted correctly the VOR / ILS function worked very well. You are correct ...if it wasn't the ride was interesting.
Of course with the Bell System we got very good at rolling those little wheels.

oleary 25th Mar 2017 20:54


Originally Posted by albatross (Post 9719146)
Once we got the sensitivity adjusted correctly the VOR / ILS function worked very well. You are correct ...if it wasn't the ride was interesting.
Of course with the Bell System we got very good at rolling those little wheels.

Dear God don't remind me of that setup. :ugh:

For night slinging it was hopeless. We usually just turned off the AFCS and hand bombed it in SCAS.

Blueberry1 14th Mar 2020 21:07

I saw that helicopter at a Helicopter Convention in New Orleans. It did belong to Clint Eastwood. It was a Bell 206 modified to look like a Bell 222. It had a stub wing attached near the cabin floor housing the main retractable landing gear. The retractable nose wheel went up into the former landing/taxi light space. New lights were on the stub wing. Parker Hannefin supplied the landing gear for this helicopter as well as many experimental fixed wing aircraft of the day.
The paint job was kind of dark but the overall appearance was quite beautiful. I believe it had all leather grey interior. Totally executive.

Gordy 15th Mar 2020 02:38

Dis one:

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....949afc19a1.gif


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:12.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.