PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Instrument Approach in JAA/EASA Class G Airspace (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/359742-instrument-approach-jaa-easa-class-g-airspace.html)

Vertolot 27th Jan 2009 17:25

Instrument Approach in JAA/EASA Class G Airspace
 
Hi,

Does anybody know if intsrument approaches to aerodromes located in class G airspace (uncontrolled) is allowed JAA/EASA land??

Thanks in advance,

helicopter-redeye 27th Jan 2009 17:28

I'm going to say 'yes' on the basis that I've flown pulished instrument approaches to airports located in class G in JAA/EASA land, but is it a trick question?

(Examples/ Gloucester/ Sheffield/ Doncaster pre Class D/ Coventry/ Humberside/ Cranfield/ Cambridge)

Vertolot 27th Jan 2009 17:59

No trick question, I'm just interested to know if it's allowed and in use in EASA land without the airspace being G+ and with AFIS.

SARBlade 27th Jan 2009 18:31

I believe that if the approach is published and current, and ATC clears you out of uncontrolled airspace for an approach, then you can execute the approach. If it is for training purposes remember to have overshoot instructions to re-enter controlled airspace after the approach.;)

Bladecrack 27th Jan 2009 20:21

Like Redeye says there are quite a few airports in class G with published instrument approaches, whether it is sensible to do IFR approaches on marginal days when there may be low level VFR traffic around, (really bad wx days seem safer cos then there is no VFR traffic about) not talking to anyone, and the airport you are landing at is procedural only cos it has no radar is another matter..! :eek:

Helinut 27th Jan 2009 22:06

Vertolot,

There are many examples of IFR approaches outside controlled airspace. However, in the UK anyway, they seem to require full ATC (i.e. TWR or RAD/APP), not just AFIS

Helinut

SASless 27th Jan 2009 22:56

Can one not fly IMC outside controlled airspace without an ATC clearance?

Goggle Up 28th Jan 2009 01:35

Bladecrack (should get that looked at BTW :eek:),

What you're desrcibing is a normal day in Oz. Not that bad provided everyone talks to one another and you keep up the SA. Not uncommon to be setting up for an instrument approach with a couple of RPT (reg public transport) turbo props also inbound IMC and a few joe punters stoogeing around VFR in the circuit.

We don't have the luxury of so much controlled airspace/radar coverage over here. :ok:

GU

CarryOnCopter 28th Jan 2009 10:38

Simple answer is yes as Helinut said. A lot of flying in helicopters is IMC in class G airspace.

For example you can take off from Southend, go IMC to MSA, flog aroung the Heathrow control zone and do an ILS in to Farnborough, all class G but 100ft below class A.

There are quite a few places that have no radar so you are expected to fly the procedure, usually a nearby radar service can look out for you for a large chunk of the approach but not always.

Pretty sure ATC is a minimum requirment in the UK, probably all over JAA/ EASA land but nobody bothered telling some places on the continent which is a good thing as they leave the ILS on when they go for a three hour lunch, at least you can get down.

SASless 28th Jan 2009 11:35

As Class G airspace is "uncontrolled" there is no requirement/ability for an ATC "Clearance". Thus in theory one would be free to fly without talking to anyone beyond that required for VFR flights into/near airfields in Class G airspace.

Canada requires a Flight Plan be filed.

The USA does not....just requires the aircraft and pilot be legal for IFR flight. Procedural reports to other aircraft are required in addition to normal traffic reports.

Bladecrack 28th Jan 2009 17:10

Goggle & SAS,

The problem with the UK is that we don't have common traffic frequencies for specific areas to achieve the level of situational awareness you probably have in Oz and the US.. There are basically 2 FIR regions that cover the whole of the UK and can give you traffic info, but only the traffic that they are aware of.

For example, imagine you are inbound IFR to an airport in class G for a procedural ILS and you are not high enough to be in controlled airspace before starting the approach. You call up ATC and get cleared for a procedural ILS from overhead a beacon. However there could be traffic crossing through your level, or your approach path that is IMC but still in class G. That traffic could be talking to:

1. The airport you are inbound to (for local traffic info if you are lucky)
2. The FIR controller, who can give flight/traffic info but has no radar.
3. Another airport ATC unit in the vicinity, who may or may not have radar.
4. No one at that particular time, although it would be good airmanship to be in contact with who ever can provide the best service in that area.

So best case scenario is that another ATC unit passes the traffic info to the ATC unit you are working, and worst case scenario is you rely on the trusty old TAS/TCAS, if you have one, and assuming the other guy has his mode C switched on.. :hmm:

BC

SASless 28th Jan 2009 18:10

Are we pointing out yet another problem with the CAA school of thought here?

I always found the lack of CTAF frequencies and Flight Service Station units to be a major shortcoming of the UK system.

How many times on a long cross country trip do you hear....."Pass your details...."

Goggle Up 28th Jan 2009 23:49

Jassus :eek:

Sounds like the CAA are working on "the big sky theory"!! :ugh:

I understand your pain.

GU


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:30.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.