PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   BBC: Air Medics (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/344516-bbc-air-medics.html)

TorqueOfTheDevil 24th Oct 2008 11:59


would the 'drama' experienced by a chap with suspected heart problems getting winched by a helicopter and whizzed off to hospital pose a potential risk?
Possibly - but then so would a protracted carry over difficult terrain.


proof that AA's in the north would benifit from a winch
Could a small aircraft of the types used by the air ambs mount a winch with the same capability (cable length, lifting ability etc) as a Sea King? I very much doubt it, in which case fitting a mini-winch would help on some occasions but cause greater problems on others. Besides, with the credit crunch, I would guess that the GNAAS would be hard pressed to splash out on new equipment and crew training - especially as currently they don't even man all their aircraft 7 days a week.

MightyGem 24th Oct 2008 20:46


Best bit was the throw away comment on the Bolkow bomb bay where they put the stretcher now. Any ex 105 bomb aimers out there
Yes, I think he was referring to the aircraft's former life with the German Army, where it possibly had a HOT(High subsonic, Optically tracked, Tube launched) Antitank missile fit. reloads could have been carried in the back.

Though the programme was well made, but I was getting ready to throw something at the screen everytime they mentioned the golden hour!!

I thought that I recognised one of the pilot's names, Steve Graham, but didn't recognise him until he actually spoke. Hi there Waves. Bit less hair and a few more pounds than when you were at 654 in Detmold!! :ok:

IFHP 25th Oct 2008 09:59

Bombs not missiles were mentioned... and didn't the Bo used to be AZOR in another life.

MightyGem 25th Oct 2008 16:16

Sorry, bombs were mentioned, as was the fact that the 105 in question had started out with the German Army. Of course, that fact could have been an error by the programme makers, but it was said.

Whirlygig 25th Oct 2008 16:38

The narrator did say that they were putting the patient into the old bomb bay. At that point, I looked up from my ironing and saw the Bolkow 105!

Cheers

Whirls

quichemech 27th Oct 2008 15:52

I do believe the Bolkow was G-AZOR in a previous life, the Pilot flying it was also a former Bond man:rolleyes:

MightyGem 28th Oct 2008 10:21

Going through G-INFO brings up this page:
GINFO Registration History | Aircraft Register | Safety Regulation

which subsequently leads to this:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/HistoricalMaterial/G-AZOR.pdf

So, G-WAAN is Ser No 20 built in 71/72. The German Army didn't order 105s until 1977 so the BBC were incorrect about it's history.

peterprobe 28th Oct 2008 10:25

All in all a good advert for which aircraft NOT to use in that role, 109 sinks, 105 excellent in it s day but gone now ( too many fat patients) leaving 902 and 135 (take your pick). Mind you I get all my info on the job from a 902 driver!!

Fargoo 28th Oct 2008 19:06

Anyone know when the 1/2 hour episodes are going to show. Nothing on the listings for this week.

Barshifter 30th Oct 2008 22:42

Early 2009 seems to be the general concensus.No reasons as to why it was pulled.Seems the BBC are suspending quite a few programs at the minute :}

500 Fan 30th Oct 2008 23:51

Quote "Best bit was the throw away comment on the Bolkow bomb bay where they put the stretcher now. Any ex 105 bomb aimers out there ?"

There is one actually. Rose Dugdale is her name and thankfully she was a crap bomb-aimer! She was one of two people to hijack an Irish Helicopters BO-105 in Donegal back in the early seventies and take it across the border on a bombing mission, targetting Strabane police station. The 'bombs' were made from milk churns filled with explosives. They were a little too big to fit out through the side doors and when they did manage to get them out, they missed the target. Maybe if they had used the 'bomb bay' down the back they might have been 'successful!?!' Ironically, another Irish Helicopters BO-105 went on a bombing mission in 1980 in the film 'North Sea Hijack', this time using the rear bomb bay. Don't know who the bombers were that day, though!

500 Fan.

Farmer 1 31st Oct 2008 12:42


So, G-WAAN is Ser No 20 built in 71/72. The German Army didn't order 105s until 1977 so the BBC were incorrect about it's history.
G-AZOR is/was a 105D. The German army operated 105C's, I believe, well before 1977. The D spec. was for British CAA requirements.

I believe the aircraft used in the film North Sea Hijack was G-AZTI. These two aircraft were, I think, the first 105s operated by Management Aviation. The bomb in question was collected from the platform's stores department. It is a little-known fact that all offshore oil/gas installations keep a selection of bombs for such purposes.:rolleyes:

WylieCoyote 14th Apr 2009 13:31

Friday, 20:30 on BBC One (except Scotland)

Second episode this Friday, those of us North of the border will have to resort to Iplayer.

g-mady 14th Apr 2009 17:26

I just looked... it says episode 1 of 8??? Are they re-running the first episode?

The new North sea program of Virgin1 is worth a mention too!

MADY

WylieCoyote 14th Apr 2009 19:16

I don't think it's a repeat, the first episode was 'The Golden Hour' and was a pilot episode, this is the first of the series. That's how the bbc description reads on the website to me anyway.

Barshifter 17th Apr 2009 09:17

Looks like the BBC are just running odd episodes again.My recorder wont let me put it on series link.

vortexadminman 17th Apr 2009 13:07

"I would guess that the GNAAS would be hard pressed to splash out on new equipment and crew training - especially as currently they don't even man all their aircraft 7 days a week." err yes they do!!!

TorqueOfTheDevil 17th Apr 2009 13:51


err yes they do!!!
When I wrote that comment last October, the Otterburn site was only manned Mon-Fri, and having just checked their website, there's no newsflash of "Otterburn aircraft now flying 7 days per week" or similar to suggest it's changed.

Clever Richard 17th Apr 2009 20:33

Is the commentary accurate?
 
I have just watched tonight's episode and would be grateful if someone in the know could say whether the commentary is blowing the risks and hazards faced by the crews out of all proportion. If so, the BBC is doing the GNAA a great dis-service. The following is what I deduced from the commentary:

The job in the Lake District apparently involved a helo landing in a precarious position and, in order to vacate the area, the crew was almost blocked in by weather they must surely have been briefed about. What was the fallback plan if they had been socked in at a remote location?

The Coast Guard chap was in a location dangerous to the helo from the risk of being hit by an unexpected wave. However, the pilot elected to land there and 'hotload' the casualty. There were vehicles parked about 50 yds from the incident so why didn't a land ambulance attend?

The crews involved must be shaking their heads in disbelief at the commentary. Nice air-to-air shots though!

CD

stringfellow 17th Apr 2009 21:04

bear in mind richard the programme has to have mass appeal in order to support ratings and if that means exaggerating perceived risks then thats just good viewing... i for one enjoyed every minute of it.

1. the conditions in the lakes can change in a heart beat, if it clouded in then simply land the mountain rescue team were on hand...the laborious exit from the hills did seem over played, most lakeland valleys do open out into low lands fairly promptly.

2. the sea rescue seemed fine to me the risk was not the landing area but the number of bye standers present.

great viewing and a great promotion.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.