PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Sea King too old and putting Lives at risk. (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/299347-sea-king-too-old-putting-lives-risk.html)

Justintime80 7th Nov 2007 08:16

Sea King too old and putting Lives at risk.
 
cats out of the bag:)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/humber/7082053.stm

Just suprised it's taken so long to come out.

Bravo73 7th Nov 2007 08:26

Well, it's a good thing then that they are all going to be replaced by S-92s, eh? :E

Alloa Akbar 7th Nov 2007 08:28

lets all hold our breath for that one.. on the count of 3,

1,2.......3!:oh:

leopold bloom 7th Nov 2007 10:08

Ancient Aircraft
 
Check out the thread in Mil Aircrew, SAR Privatisation.

chcoffshore 7th Nov 2007 12:33

Just did............Some people getting their knickers in a twist. We all know SAR H is happening and the S92/AW139 are upto date excellent a/c. So whats the problem?

3D CAM 7th Nov 2007 13:01

"S92/AW139 are up to date and excellent aircraft"
Just what do you base that statement on?? The publicity brochure or your companies spin on the new contract?
One type is only just into SAR, last month and not yet proven, and the other one is still just a dream!:confused:
I would love to see both types become first class replacements for the type/s they are due to replace, and that will take some doing, but to say they are excellent is jumping the gun somewhat!

chcoffshore 7th Nov 2007 13:12

Really:eek:? Been in a S61 lately. But like i said they are both excellent a/c. Have a look at their world wide useage not just the UK.

MOSTAFA 7th Nov 2007 13:19

How long before ...................................?

oldbeefer 7th Nov 2007 13:55

............Crab comes along?

Bravo73 7th Nov 2007 13:58


Originally Posted by chcoffshore (Post 3687072)
Have a look at their world wide useage not just the UK.

They are. And as it stands, neither aircraft is a proven SAR platform.

Just because they are new and shiny doesn't mean to say that they are currently 'fit for purpose'. Only time will tell.

chcoffshore 7th Nov 2007 14:12

Ok point taken............Lets wait and see!

3D CAM 7th Nov 2007 14:28

"Been in an S61 lately"
Well, actually, yes!! More than one come to that. Have you?? An SAR one that is!:ugh:

ericferret 7th Nov 2007 14:29

I doubt that the age of the aircraft is the issue.

Spares parts availability and maintenance are the areas of concern.

Current hours for S61s, some over 40,000, for Super Pumas approaching 30,000+.

Well maintained helicopters go on for ever.

MOSTAFA 7th Nov 2007 14:40

Should change your name to "Old Spoilsport"

before landing check list 12th Nov 2007 03:41

I fly a S61 with Carson Blades and typed (CAA/FAA) in the aircraft. Any questions?

[email protected] 12th Nov 2007 05:49

Oh ...........did someone say something about SAR aircraft......I'd hate to disappoint by not showing up on the thread:)

MOSTAFA 12th Nov 2007 08:37

Cracking Jon

oldbeefer 12th Nov 2007 09:48

Took longer than I expected!

MOSTAFA 12th Nov 2007 10:03

Ditto!!!!!

bolkow 12th Nov 2007 14:44

Thats kind of the same view I have about the sea king, also were not the seakings a few years back replaced with mark 8's? I am sure the ones at Chivenor were, and if that is the case they would still be very young airframes in terms of hours etc? Correct me if I am wrong.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:48.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.