PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Sikorsky S-76: Ask Nick Lappos (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/190924-sikorsky-s-76-ask-nick-lappos.html)

Joker's Wild 31st Aug 2002 07:04

S76's & Triple Tachs
 
Just when I thought I'd seen it all, another surprise.

Here's the deal:

Both Nr needles go to zero and stay there (on the ground by the way). Take a look around and note that both CB's are popped as well, ESS Bus and PRI bus.

What I don't know is how the Nr pickup on the MGB is wired inside. If the pickup is generating one signal only, and that signal is ultimately split between two independent electrical buses to their respective triple tachs, what might cause both CB's to pop?

Cheers

ShyTorque 31st Aug 2002 20:29

Possibly a short circuit (to earth) in the instrument itself or its wiring?:confused:

almost canadian 1st Sep 2002 00:26

did you use rotorbrake on shutdown?;)

Nick Lappos 1st Sep 2002 12:50

the Nr tach is dual powered, with a single coil in the pulse pickup feeding the indicators (another coil, in the pickup but electrically independant, serves the other ship's needs for Nr, such as DCA or FADEC.) Diodes isolate one power source from another.

Sounds like a short in the instrument to me. What did it turn out to be?

Joker's Wild 3rd Sep 2002 07:18

Problem turned out to be the pilot's triple tach.

Should one be surprised that the copilot triple tach went u/s also?

Seems to me I heard a story a long time ago concerning the way the pilot and copilot triple tachs were wired (linked), or something to that effect, although I can no longer remember what the details were. It's been a while so I might be out in space on this one.

Cheers

Coriolis 5th Sep 2002 20:21

What you need is a 'B' (or a'C'?)

Then you don't need a triple tacho at all 'cos you just know that Nr's gonna be 107 regardless, and P&W's favourite sons are gonna do what it takes to keep it that way while 4 EECs look after them.....now that's class

Shame about the first try with the C30s!

What was all that about the PBA being a no-go item until the 'B' replaced it with a fixed length rod???? ;)

Xnr 25th Sep 2002 02:18

S76 Wheel Brakes
 
Nick

After our chat on the phone the other day I found quite interesting your analysis of the capabilities of the S76 wheel brakes.

You stated that if you were concerned about burning up real estate on a rejected OEI take-off or an OEI landing that placing the aircraft on the ground and applying the wheel brakes would out perform the aerodynamic braking ability of a 20 degree nose up flair.

With over 3000+ hrs on the machine I never believed this to be true. I fact I feel that quite a few other S76 drivers are of the same opinion.

I put this out here so you can share this info with our fellow S76 pilots.

Jump in any time.

Cheers

Xnr

p.s. I am researching a Canadian pub for you regarding VRS vs. SWP

IHL 25th Sep 2002 03:42

Xnr: if you were to touch down at 15 degrees nose UP, there is a great risk of crunching the tail cone. @20 degrees nose up you would most certainly 'DRAG THE TAIL".

Nigel Osborn 25th Sep 2002 06:21

With most wheeled helicopters and certainly with the 76, the shortest stopping distance is obtained by getting the machine on the ground quickly and applying full brakes. Much above 12 degrees nose up will guarantee a tailboom repair job!:D

Xnr 25th Sep 2002 11:47

Boys

I didn't mean to confuse you......but with over 3000 hrs on type I think I know that you can't hold that flare below 30' AGL on a S76.

Cheers

Chris

IHL 25th Sep 2002 22:13

XNR sorry; But one can't assume. I've seen experienced guys do some bizarre things.

GLSNightPilot 26th Sep 2002 00:06

I have to agree that the ground will slow you more quickly than the air. There just isn't that much friction in the air, & the S76 doesn't like to slow down up there. You might need to replace the brakes & the wheels when you're finished, but that's better than the entire machine.

IHL 26th Sep 2002 03:11

GLSNightPilot:

My experience has been that on a dry runway the brakes are not powerful enough to lock up the wheels. One maximum performance brake application won't ruin the brakes either.

The only time you risk grinding down a tire is when the runway is wet. Then its easy to lock up the wheels.

GLSNightPilot 26th Sep 2002 05:56

Perhaps, but we used to have a set of wheels above the door to the pilot's lounge here that were worn through the treads when an unnamed pilot taxied to the fuel pad with the brakes locked. The wheels never even tried to turn, while the pilot was wondering why it took so much power to taxi. I think I'd try to have the brakes locked before I hit the ground, in the above scenario. Fortunately I've never had to try it for real.

Brother 26th Sep 2002 12:41

IHL

My experience is that the brakes ARE good enough to lock the wheels on a dry runway at max run on speed on 40 knots. If yours are not then you should get them checked.

B

Nick Lappos 26th Sep 2002 12:55

Comments on breaks and tires and aerodynamic breaking:

Brakes on helos are not exactly like those on cars, but they are powerful. The friction of a tire is large, about 75% of the weight that it supports. For an S76, this means that the two mains can put about 5000 pounds of deceleration on the aircraft, probably about .4 G

The brakes on an S-76 will certainly lock the wheels with full bottom collective, I have left dark black stripes and blue smoke during Cat A and Cat B landings, and the tires made a thumping feel as they rotated after that!
Tires make the most stopping force when they are at 95% of the ground speed, ie just slipping, not stopped. That is how ABS and "pumping the brakes" works. Skidding tires are quite a bit poorer at stopping.

Aerodynamic breaking is a very poor way to slow a helicopter. With normal attitudes, about .1 g is all that is available. Even with ridiculous nose up attitudes, like 20 degrees, the thrust of the main rotor that is actually decelerating you is about 25%, or about .25G, a lot less than the brakes can provide.

If you are on the ground, nose wheel off, mains on, the rotor is even less effective, because it is producing less thrust, and therefore has less decel capability. This situation, (mains on, nose off) is also bad for aft stick on most helos, because of the possibility of making a blade tailcone contact. The 76 has a control limiter to keep this from happening, but many helos do not(including original 76A's that have not had the control system mod - ask maintenance if the limiter SB has been installed!) , and it could be a bit more expensive to replace the blades then to replace the brakes!

donut king 26th Sep 2002 14:44

to XNR.... a test!!!
 
Picture this situation XNR.....!

Two 76's side by side...
One on the ground...one in the hover..

15-20 kts forward speed( just an arbitrary number)

wheel taxiing 76 JAMS on the brakes while the hovering one flares 20 degrees.

Which one stops first???


While you're at it...... Two trains leaving at the same time...one travelling east, the other west......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!( just joking!!!)

D.K

ShyTorque 26th Sep 2002 21:09

Nick,

I tried today to leave some black lines behind the aircraft. Failed completely. Grass and sheep all dead. Where am I going wrong?

;)

Nick Lappos 27th Sep 2002 00:26

See, ShyTorque, I told you they were powerful........

In the States, dead sheep mean lots of Environmental paperwork, I'd suggest staying off the brakes.;)

IHL 27th Sep 2002 03:48

Brother & Nick:

I guess my little legs ain't strong enough, cause I anin't never seen them wheels locked up when the collectived was full down.

Of course if the brakes were locked before touch down, well thats a different scenario.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:51.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.