PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Can you identify this helicopter? (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/184083-can-you-identify-helicopter.html)

Dave_Jackson 30th Jul 2005 22:45

Can you identify this helicopter?
 
http://www.unicopter.com/Temporary/Excalibur.jpg

ShyTorque 30th Jul 2005 22:56

Something tells me it might be called an Excalibur, can't think what makes me say that though.

joedirt 30th Jul 2005 22:57

Sure, it's the photoshop Excalibur 7.3 version of "hey, look at me, I'm wacko but I don't care" helicopter.........

twinstar_ca 30th Jul 2005 23:05

looks an awful lot like a jazzed up rotorway exec with no skid gear!!! :cool:

Dave_Jackson 30th Jul 2005 23:42

OK ShyTorque fess up. How did your arrive at the answer so quickly? :uhoh:

Here's a question with a slightly higher level of difficulty.
Who is the well-known rotorcraft designer of this craft? :E

Dave :D

ShyTorque 30th Jul 2005 23:50

Dave, a pure guess. I think the pilot pulled it out of a stone.

joedirt 31st Jul 2005 00:07

The same designer of the Alfa Romeo Spider (he/she left no legroom in the backseat for any known human species, and probably used photoshop to conway his/hers absurd designs on innocent human beings).
What's so difficult about that question, since we are in la-la land anyway ?

http://unicopter.com/UniCopter_Fuel.html

1. The fuel should be centered on the rotors, therefore;

Much better reading than Harry Potter :ok:

aeromys 31st Jul 2005 00:47

A split second after the picture was taken, the tail rotor chopped off the horizontal stabiliser....

Galapagos 31st Jul 2005 01:27

Isn't it the Jetson's?

:}

Ian Corrigible 31st Jul 2005 02:15

Word on the street is that the Excalibur has a great cruise speed and excellent fuel economy, but that the landing procedure is a tad tricky. Personally, I'm surprised they ever managed to obtain FAA approval.

http://cts322.com/db5/00416/cts322.c...l206hover1.jpg

:E

I/C

Graviman 31st Jul 2005 20:02

Hehehehehe.
 
Now that's funny! :ok:

Dave,

I take it you are trying to provoke reactions for a new development in the "Unicopter" saga? Mine would be that i like the concept, but would need to know more tech spec intensions. It looks a bit like a composite upgrade to the Lockheed 186, especially with the 4 blade rigid rotor. The cleverest 186 features were the gyro stabilisation (non powered preferred though - cost), and of course the retractable skids.

Oops, just realised it's a 5-blade rotor. I initially thought that fuzzy thing over the hub was "the force". Saves on crane rental... :}

Mart

hemac 31st Jul 2005 21:36

Either that was really fast film or the main rotor is really slooow.

H.

SASless 1st Aug 2005 08:28

Don't know about the helicopter...but that is Taf Wilson's milk barn under the rotorblades!:E

Dave_Jackson 2nd Aug 2005 04:20

and a little more
 
http://www.unicopter.com/Temporary/Excalibur3View.jpg

ShyTorque 2nd Aug 2005 09:11

Rectractable undercarriage... wow!

Must be a trick of the light but it looks like the mainwheel tyres are bigger than the bay!

Graviman 2nd Aug 2005 19:37

Hmmm....
 
Anything to do with these guys?

http://www.excaliburaircraft.com/


Mart

g-mady 3rd Aug 2005 06:37

Ian Corrigible - Now thats funny,

There was me thinking it was a joke or artists idea until I saw Dave's second posting!

RHM

rzender 7th Aug 2005 20:13

That's a concept helicopter by Revolution Helicopters ... the makers of the Mini-500 kit Helicopter.

Dave_Jackson 7th Aug 2005 20:19

rzender;

You've got it. :ok:

They are designing and building two prototype for a manufacture outside the US.

TorqueStripe 7th Aug 2005 20:57

That climb rate of 457 km /minute sure sounds like a lot of fun.


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:39.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.