Sea Kings to Ukraine
Originally not below the sliding door, just beside at the lower left corner ( looking from outside ).
https://www.militaryaircraft.de/pict...2_2838_800.jpg
skadi
https://www.militaryaircraft.de/pict...2_2838_800.jpg
skadi
That is the RAF version.
RN pressure refuel point was/is starboard side below the sliding cargo door. Not sure about the Jungly ones though.
Gravity fuel points are on the port side.
The position below makes it easier for HIFR, but the german MK41 did that method too.
skadi
Crab
Lot's of different parts (Westland Sea King vs Sikorsky H-3 or S-61) including the major assemblies you mentioned.
The MRB difference is down to the folding head nature of the Sea King versus the fixed head of the S-61. Rotor diameter is the same, blade length different. Or at least that's what I remember about the Carson blades (designed originally for the S-61)
Nick
Lot's of different parts (Westland Sea King vs Sikorsky H-3 or S-61) including the major assemblies you mentioned.
The MRB difference is down to the folding head nature of the Sea King versus the fixed head of the S-61. Rotor diameter is the same, blade length different. Or at least that's what I remember about the Carson blades (designed originally for the S-61)
Nick
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,761
Received 2,742 Likes
on
1,168 Posts
It came about because we had a Chief Tech posted onto them when we the RAF were about to get them, he wasn't the brightest of sparks and was sent off to do the Airframe course ( he was an Engine trade ) followed by the Engine course, he was gone for several months on courses and was back awaiting his posting.
We had the visiting Boscombe one come in for fuel and the first time he had stirred for a long time he slid out the door like greased squirrel sh*t to refuel it, naturally we all followed him out as he dragged the hose out then couldn't find the refuelling point... How we all laughed at him, six plus months on courses and he couldn't even refuel it and needed the crew to help him out all i can think is he was looking behind the door for it..
Happy days
We had the visiting Boscombe one come in for fuel and the first time he had stirred for a long time he slid out the door like greased squirrel sh*t to refuel it, naturally we all followed him out as he dragged the hose out then couldn't find the refuelling point... How we all laughed at him, six plus months on courses and he couldn't even refuel it and needed the crew to help him out all i can think is he was looking behind the door for it..
Happy days
Last edited by NutLoose; 29th Nov 2022 at 14:55.
Originally not below the sliding door, just beside at the lower left corner ( looking from outside ).
https://www.militaryaircraft.de/pict...2_2838_800.jpg
skadi
https://www.militaryaircraft.de/pict...2_2838_800.jpg
skadi
AFAIK only the RN had the pressure refuel point below the sliding door. The norwegian, belgian and the german ones, which I used to fly, had it beside the door. On pictures of the commando version I found them there too.
The position below makes it easier for HIFR, but the german MK41 did that method too.
skadi
The position below makes it easier for HIFR, but the german MK41 did that method too.
skadi
They're the ones that I flew, anyway.
The following users liked this post:
Tech points aside those airframes were as cheap as first believed along with spares to start and UK gov has paid now as much as publicly suggested would indicate a lack of due diligence.
The following users liked this post:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,761
Received 2,742 Likes
on
1,168 Posts
That’s par for the course, they did the same with the Jags, sold them off then realised they needed a runner to use as a ground instructional frame, so had to buy one back making a tidy profit for the seller.
First glimpses of the SK in Ukriane colors
https://theaviationist.com/2023/01/2...27kgHWgstPWL3w
cheers
https://theaviationist.com/2023/01/2...27kgHWgstPWL3w
cheers
I’m sure the Boscombe Down Sea King was a US built SH-3 The Westland Sea King was hugely different from the S61 - I remember the SAR boys in FI trying to nick a S61 tail rotor and all went fine till they found the S61 had six blades.
When it comes to incompetance the MOD is in a league of it's own.
Gnome de PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,599
Received 277 Likes
on
153 Posts
Yes, XV370 was an SH-3, apparently Sikorsky built the first four UK airframes, the first was completed and had T-58s fitted by Sikorsky, the other three were completed by Westland with Gnomes.
The following users liked this post:
FOI request returned with the 'National Security Interest' caveat for not disclosing price paid etc. What a load of bo77ocks - it's all over the press - instigated by MOD themselves! Another 'boys club' venture backed / greased by previous slave driving connections?
The following 2 users liked this post by EESDL:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65242823
“A military helicopter donated to Ukraine by the UK government was used in the Falklands conflict more than 40 years ago, the BBC has learned. Despite its age, the Ukrainian military says the aircraft will help in the war against Russia.”
“A military helicopter donated to Ukraine by the UK government was used in the Falklands conflict more than 40 years ago, the BBC has learned. Despite its age, the Ukrainian military says the aircraft will help in the war against Russia.”