Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Families of R116 crew face significant legal bills

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Families of R116 crew face significant legal bills

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Oct 2021, 07:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Galway
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Families of R116 crew face significant legal bills

Families of R116 crew face significant legal bills (rte.ie)
Davey Emcee is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2021, 09:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,251
Received 331 Likes on 184 Posts
Fearful that attempts could be made during the review to attach blame for the accident to any of the deceased crew, the families of Ms Fitzpatrick, Mr Duffy and Mr Smith hired legal counsel to represent the deceased trio at the Review Board hearings.
Were they advised of the purpose of the AAIU investigations?

Foreword
This safety investigation is exclusively of a technical nature and the Final Report reflects the determination of the AAIU regarding the circumstances of this occurrence and its probable and contributory causes. In accordance with the provisions of Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Regulation (EU) No 996/20102 and Statutory Instrument No. 460 of 20093 , safety investigations are in no case concerned with apportioning blame or liability.

They are independent of, separate from and without prejudice to any judicial or administrative proceedings to apportion blame or liability. The sole objective of this safety investigation and Final Report is the prevention of accidents and incidents. Accordingly, it is inappropriate that AAIU Reports should be used to assign fault or blame or determine liability, since neither the safety investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose.

Extracts from this Report may be published providing that the source is acknowledged, the material is accurately reproduced and that it is not used in a derogatory or misleading context.
212man is online now  
Old 20th Oct 2021, 11:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 900
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
212

That's all well and good - and I wholeheartedly support that sentiment.

But in the real world, where these families know that the operator is making significant (unprecedented?) representations to the review process, I think it's understandable that they should wish to be represented in that process - Don't you?

OvertHawk is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.