Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopter One Stick Control

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopter One Stick Control

Old 14th Apr 2021, 10:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 1,996
Helicopter One Stick Control

Didn't they do a trial on an H53, where the pilot had a FBW joystick which worked in 4 axes as a cyclic; with an up-down range for collective and a twist grip for yaw? Clearly went nowhere. I can find no record...

Did I dream this? I'm confident I didn't! Can I patent it!

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2021, 13:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 869
I don't know about the 53, but they definitely did that on the Sikorsky SHADOW. The concept didn't work all that great. The Comanche had no pedals, just a sidearm controller and collective. All of Sikorsky's later FBW efforts had separate controls like a traditional helicopter. I assume they covered the 4 axis control with patents.

Last edited by IFMU; 14th Apr 2021 at 17:08.
IFMU is online now  
Old 14th Apr 2021, 14:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,080
I saw an experimental one fitted to a Bell 205 at the Canadian aeronautical establishment (National Research Council ) in Ottawa years ago. up-down for collective, twist left-right for TR control and stir it around for cyclic control. Oh it had no stab bar. I have sent a request to them for more information.
albatross is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2021, 15:33
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 1,996
Originally Posted by albatross View Post
I saw an experimental one fitted to a Bell 205 at the Canadian aeronautical establishment (National Research Council ) in Ottawa years ago. up-down for collective, twist left-right for TR control and stir it around for cyclic control. Oh it had no stab bar. I have sent a request to them for more information.
At least I didn't make it up!

Cheers Albatross and IFMU.

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2021, 16:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Nigeria
Age: 54
Posts: 4,894
Comanche had no pedals, just a sidearm controller and pedals
I'm guessing that one of those references to 'pedals' should say 'collective'?
212man is online now  
Old 14th Apr 2021, 17:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 869
Originally Posted by 212man View Post
I'm guessing that one of those references to 'pedals' should say 'collective'?
Fixed, thanks.
IFMU is online now  
Old 14th Apr 2021, 19:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 3,299
It wasn't a success because of the limitations of the human arm - raising the "collective" induced movement in other axes, and it was hard to get a pure movement in one axis without disturbing the others. Of course with the natural secondary effects of controls, moving one requires corrections in the others, but the induced movements weren't necessarily in the right direction.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2021, 20:13
  #8 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 13,149
Trying to control a vertical bounce would have been interesting.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2021, 20:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 944
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie View Post
It wasn't a success because of the limitations of the human arm - raising the "collective" induced movement in other axes, and it was hard to get a pure movement in one axis without disturbing the others. Of course with the natural secondary effects of controls, moving one requires corrections in the others, but the induced movements weren't necessarily in the right direction.
Only half of a FBW solution - rather than just directly controlling the flight surfaces it should have been directing a stabilised flight controller. In other words, an up command needed to also know about increasing anti torque, compensating side drift etc.
krypton_john is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2021, 23:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 869
I played around with the 4 axis controller in the sim at Sikorsky a bunch. From what I remember it was very hard to not cross couple even with all the fancy control laws. Some of the Sikorsky pilots got decent at it but it was a high workload. We had an old Comanche sidearm for the X2 but we didn't use the yaw axis. We had pedals instead.
IFMU is online now  
Old 15th Apr 2021, 02:40
  #11 (permalink)  
CTR
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 171
ARTI

Bell and McDonnell Helicopter were experimenting with 4 axis controllers under the ARTI program in the 80ís.

Bell/McDonnell-Douglas LHX helicopter - development history, photos, technical data
CTR is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2021, 13:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 1,493
It would be interesting trying to operate a one-stick control if a hydraulic system failed. Fwd, aft, left, right wouldn't be too much of a problem on a lightie but up, down, twist could be quite challenging. If however it's all FBW then maybe a Playstation control would be better.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2021, 13:21
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Durham, NC USA
Posts: 360
MH-53E Hoist Controller

The MH-53E incorporated a limited 2 axis (FWD/AFT Left/Right) control on the hoist controller. This allowed the crew chief to position the aircraft over the load to be hoisted.
Jack Carson is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2021, 13:46
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,080
Doesn’t the S-64 Skycrane have a hand controller in the rear facing cockpit to aid in precision placing of long-line controls?
albatross is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2021, 10:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: unsteady
Posts: 351
What was the reasoning behind these trials? Having the left hand available at all times might be an advantage in a complex single pilot cockpit. But why get rid of the pedals?

I know two people that are dreaming of such a setup due to physical disabilities.
whoknows idont is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2021, 11:18
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 786
Folks who did back seat flying in the CH-54 where the electric sidearm controller did pitch/roll and yaw would certainly concur with Ascend Charlie and IFMU. Still, the RAH-66 had those three on the sidearm, but you'll also note that the MHP S-92 FBW has electric pedals.

Last edited by JohnDixson; 16th Apr 2021 at 11:22. Reason: Additional thought
JohnDixson is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.