Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Aus Army AW139s

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Aus Army AW139s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Nov 2020, 16:08
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: nowhere special
Posts: 468
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
RREKN, anyone with idle 139s probably.

If you search the web you find plenty for sale with low hours and decent config. Most of Toll's existing fleet are bank financed and their parent company is huge and well capitalized so lots of financing options on the table. Or leasing of course, plenty knocking around if you know the people to call.
nowherespecial is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2020, 21:05
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: beneath the stars
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rrekn
Heard that Toll are the front runner for this... where are they getting machines from?
glad its a rumour network as Toll is always a front runner on every tendered contract in Australia.
What about the other rumours that their parent company isn’t happy with the losses being made on their current contract and want out.

Last edited by driftwood1; 30th Nov 2020 at 21:26.
driftwood1 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 03:37
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Out there
Posts: 362
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Toll Group is currently owned by Japan Post whom I understand are trying to divest their holding. Rumour from the Bankstown refueller was that a Norwegian shipping company were interested in buying but not really interested in keeping the loss leading helicopter arm of the group.
Evil Twin is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 10:58
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 208
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Twin
Toll Group is currently owned by Japan Post whom I understand are trying to divest their holding. Rumour from the Bankstown refueller was that a Norwegian shipping company were interested in buying but not really interested in keeping the loss leading helicopter arm of the group.
oh this is hilarious from the armchair experts... yes, the helicopter part of Toll is running at a loss 😎. Maybe you guys need to talk to the Bankstown Aerodrome lawn mower guy for better info.... my pprune slumber has been awakened by the absolute BS being pushed here. Zzzz
Turkeyslapper is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 19:41
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: beneath the stars
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Turkeyslapper;10938084]oh this is hilarious from the armchair experts... yes, the helicopter part of Toll is running at a loss 😎. Maybe you guys need to talk to the Bankstown Aerodrome lawn mower guy for better info.... my pprune slumber has been awakened by the absolute BS being pushed here. Zzzz[/QUOTE

Oh how scary a big bad Toll monster has been woken up. Best keep our mouths shut or endure it’s wrath. For your info already spoke to lawnmower guy that’s where the info came from. Can’t you read.....
driftwood1 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 19:51
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Out there
Posts: 362
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Turkeyslapper
oh this is hilarious from the armchair experts... yes, the helicopter part of Toll is running at a loss 😎. Maybe you guys need to talk to the Bankstown Aerodrome lawn mower guy for better info.... my pprune slumber has been awakened by the absolute BS being pushed here. Zzzz

Professional Pilots RUMOUR Network. Just sayin......
Evil Twin is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2020, 10:19
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you will find that in Australia, the onshore helicopter contracts held by Toll and Babcock make a dollar whereas the offshore ones held by Babcock lose money.
industry insider is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2021, 02:37
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Underneath the Radar
Posts: 183
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Photos from the repainters facebook page


AW139 VH-YBF in Army Markings
rrekn is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2021, 09:20
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,871
Received 191 Likes on 98 Posts
Originally Posted by rrekn
Photos from the repainters facebook page


AW139 VH-YBF in Army Markings

Gee, no expense spared with the custom Army paint job on that one!
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2021, 10:01
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,837
Received 2,805 Likes on 1,195 Posts
And painting the kangeroo on the door means they can swop it between helicopters
NutLoose is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2021, 15:10
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
Gee, no expense spared with the custom Army paint job on that one!
It's the winter snow-cam paint job, and I bet they paid top dollar for it.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2021, 05:41
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Published in Army News today....and might I say, what an excellent choice for Army aviator's future career outside the Army.

Army's aviation capability has been enhanced with two Leonardo AW139 helicopters joining 5 Avn Regt in Townsville.

The two leased AW139s will be used to support Defence’s major exercises and training, and assist with emergency response activities including during the high-risk weather season.

The helicopters have similar performance to the MRH90 and will be used to support aircrew development and currency requirements when combat aircraft are not available.

The contract with Helicorp Pty Ltd (Toll Helicopters) has met all milestones, with training, aircraft serviceability, and flying hour requirements exceeding expectations.

Commander Army Aviation Command Maj-Gen Stephen Jobson said the AW139 contract would ensure Army aircrew were ready for operational tasking.

“ The Army interim commercial helicopter capability will provide Army aircrew with flying proficiency and currency training on an advanced digital aircraft,” Maj-Gen Jobson said.

“Maintaining these advanced digital cognitive skills is essential for operating complex modern combat helicopters now and into the future.”

The contract for the two leased Leonardo AW139 helicopters covers training, maintenance, logistics and continuing airworthiness support.

The initial contract ends on June 30, 2023, with options for two 12-month extensions.



gulliBell is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2021, 09:48
  #33 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Underneath the Radar
Posts: 183
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Wait, is this a defense acquisition that is actually working?
rrekn is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2021, 10:31
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: nowhere special
Posts: 468
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
rrekn: Yes.

Sensbible ask, available and "cheap" aircraft. Civil register.

Easy.
nowherespecial is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2021, 11:11
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,459
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
Nice to see a sensible paint job for once. Somebody actually looking after tax payer money.
The current paint we use on our 139's is admittedly high spec and costs around $500 a gallon.
A three colour scheme requires you to hold $1500 of paint with a one year shelf life.
Not unusual to see a gallon thrown away with a couple of egg cups full used or unopened.
The one year shelf life is unopened but that gets ignored!!!!

It is one of the hidden costs of maintaining helicopters.
Could go on about Leonardo specifying sealer at $40 a go and requiring you to use enough to cover the end of a paintbrush.
Then specifying a totally different sealer for another job where you could use the same stuff.
Again all with shelf lives and plenty of it goes in the bin.

In addition subject to the lease companies agreement that colour might be acceptable at lease return saving another $20-30000.

You can't knock somebody for saving tax payer dollars.

Last edited by ericferret; 8th Nov 2021 at 13:16. Reason: addition
ericferret is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2021, 19:36
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: On land
Posts: 244
Received 29 Likes on 13 Posts
You can't knock somebody for saving tax payer dollars.
I think that if saving tax payer dollars is the aim, shouldn’t we be looking at why the f*@k the Army is operating leased AW139s at all?
Nescafe is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2021, 00:21
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The Army doesn't have the operational capability they need from the helicopters they bought, so they rented a few helicopters to pick up the slack. In typical convoluted Army speak they came up with a good catch-phrase for that "Army interim commercial helicopter capability". That's why the General's get paid the big bucks to come up with fancy words like that.

gulliBell is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2021, 00:50
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: On land
Posts: 244
Received 29 Likes on 13 Posts
The Army doesn't have the operational capability they need from the helicopters they bought
Isn’t that story getting to be a bit too familiar?
Nescafe is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2021, 02:18
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,934
Received 392 Likes on 207 Posts
The Army doesn't have the operational capability they need from the helicopters they bought, so they rented a few helicopters to pick up the slack
Just as the RAAF contracted out their SAR requirement, in fact I'm wondering when all of the military will be put out to contract, we already have line aircraft maintenance, catering, and who knows what else. I'm sure all the contract agreements have a "no combat please" clause.
megan is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 05:48
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: North Island
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
Just as the RAAF contracted out their SAR requirement, in fact I'm wondering when all of the military will be put out to contract, we already have line aircraft maintenance, catering, and who knows what else. I'm sure all the contract agreements have a "no combat please" clause.
Contracting out SAR is a big money saver if you look at it short term. You don't have to worry about keeping your guy's current whilst still having a crew and aircraft available to cover the standby requirements. You just make that a contractor issue. It also frees the ADF guys up to focus on their primary roles.
When you aren't deploying those guys and the only output they give back is (an often weak attempt) at support to the high risk weather season you may see some benefit to having a SQN or troop who are current and trained in SAR type operations.
Vortexringshark is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.