Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

NPAS HR not so great ???

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

NPAS HR not so great ???

Old 25th Apr 2020, 12:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Guernsey
Posts: 17
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
NPAS HR not so great ???

Do NPAS employ a fabulous HR system or are there some serious shortcomings? I was just sent these two emails from an applicant to NPAS, which I think must be made via the West Yorkshire Police site for some strange reason. He believes there is a problem with the recruitment process.
It seems to be a shame, probably preventing a number of suitable candidates being given a chance to advance further in the process. Is this an inherent problem with NPAS recruitment? Or is it so ‘closed-shop’ that its a waste of time actually applying as the positions are already taken? And no, I have no axe to grind, never worked for them. Probably never would as they don’t pay enough, unless you’re lucky enough to be employed on the old Met Police ‘Grandfather’ pay scale T’s and C’s which are considerably better than normal NPAS T’s and C’s. Wink wink.


First Email received :-

Thank you for your application, I regret to advise that on this occasion your application for the position of: XP169 Rotary Line Pilot **External**, has not been successful at the shortlisting stage of the process.

As part of the application you were asked to provide responses to a series of questions, to include competency based questions. During the shortlisting process the shortlister(s) looks for written evidence in your responses to show you possess the skills and experience the Force is looking for.

To assist you should you wish to consider applying any future vacancies with us we have provided some general guidance notes about how we assess the competency based questions at the shortlisting stage. We hope you find these useful.

The shortlister(s) can only use evidence that is contained in your response to each of the questions, they cannot make assumptions. If it is not written down it cannot be assessed. In reviewing the responses the shortlister(s) will look for your contribution in the example you have provided. If it is not clear from the written response who did what, the shortlister(s) cannot attribute that example to you. The examples used to answer the questions can be drawn from your working life, school, domestic or social life, whichever best demonstrates that you possess the competency we are looking for. We do not expect the use of police type situations or your examples to be written using police terminology.

Finally, the shortlister(s) also assess your written communication skills by looking specifically at the conciseness and relevance of your responses, as well as your spelling and grammar.

We would like to thank you for your interest in West Yorkshire Police and hope you consider applying for other vacancies with us in the future.

Responses to this email are not monitored therefore should you require any assistance please email:- xxxxxxxx

Then to receive this not long afterwards???


email #2

Good morning,

Further to the system generated email that you have just received advising you that you have been unsuccessful at the shortlisting stage, please be advised that the content is inaccurate with regard to the competency based questions and evidence.

The shortlisting for line pilots is based upon evidence against the criteria set out in the advert.

We hope this clarifies the situation.



Yours Faithfully,



WYP Resourcing Team
So a system generated email (generic?) is sent but is it just a standard auto response?

Safe flying
Channel Flyer is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2020, 10:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 75
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Hi CF,

You questioned the response coming from the West Yorkshire Police "for some strange reason"? They are in charge of running NPAS, hence from where the e-mail came from! Automated responses for different reasons help out HR reply to the amount of applications they have,
and maybe something is inaccurate in the first e-mail that they need to change in the wording or it didn't all apply in this particular case to this applicant? Not perfect I know, but at least they have the decency to respond unlike nearly all the other operators these days to applicants that may not be quite suitable
Fly safe.
B.
Brutal is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2020, 21:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Nothing wrong with their HR as such. The police have a VERY different system for job applications that any prospective candidate should take note of. My missus is a Detective Constable, she applied for a highly specialised role and was rejected at interview, which she thought had gone well. Luckily the boss offered her feedback that was amazing
The job spec will state certain criteria. The force website will list current policies. At application and interview, you score points for each thing that you mention. If, at the end of the interview, you haven’t mentioned something, they will ask if there is anything you would like to add? If you then rattle off a list of policies, you score a point for each one mentioned, even though you don’t discuss ANY detail. A couple of months later she did just that, mentioning 5 things at the end.
Got the job.
Imagine you are talking to someone with no aviation knowledge whatsoever.......
jayteeto is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2020, 06:28
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Guernsey
Posts: 17
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Then shouldn’t the person doing the interviewing / screening have some aviation knowledge?
So what if there were no policies to speak about? What if you met the criteria but were told you failed because you didn’t meet the criteria? The person applying is, I believe, more than qualified in aviation terms. I think the issue was more that they were turned down and notified by an incorrect email, which then was followed up with a further email basically reinforcing the first but with an apology for the mistakes. When a candidate doesn’t even have a chance to get past a website initial application process, doesn’t this say something about the recruitment system possibly having flaws?

Maybe the person applying would be a perfect candidate but never even had the chance to prove themselves or, as you mention, ‘score points’. Regardless, they didn’t get past stage one.

Channel Flyer is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2020, 07:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 509
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Channel Flyer
Then shouldn’t the person doing the interviewing / screening have some aviation knowledge?
So what if there were no policies to speak about? What if you met the criteria but were told you failed because you didn’t meet the criteria? The person applying is, I believe, more than qualified in aviation terms. I think the issue was more that they were turned down and notified by an incorrect email, which then was followed up with a further email basically reinforcing the first but with an apology for the mistakes. When a candidate doesn’t even have a chance to get past a website initial application process, doesn’t this say something about the recruitment system possibly having flaws?

Maybe the person applying would be a perfect candidate but never even had the chance to prove themselves or, as you mention, ‘score points’. Regardless, they didn’t get past stage one.
thats the old recruitment process, the new process doesn't have any of the essay style questions.
helicrazi is online now  
Old 27th Apr 2020, 10:18
  #6 (permalink)  
gsa
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wensleydale.
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Channel Flyer
Then shouldn’t the person doing the interviewing / screening have some aviation knowledge?
In there eyes it doesn’t matter what job it is the same criteria applies to the first hurdle. Fall at the shortlist and no matter whether you’ve qualifications coming out your arse and are the best in the world at the job you won’t even get an interview as in there eyes if you don’t look into how there system works you won’t be invited to move forward in the process.

Beware the social media things from the past, if you get past the first stage they will be going through that with a fine tooth comb and picking every comment you made and might ask you for it’s context.

gsa is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2020, 11:37
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Guernsey
Posts: 17
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They’d be exceptionally bored with my social media history. I don’t have one. I don’t even use the facebook or the telegram. .
Channel Flyer is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2020, 21:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
HR people in most companies don’t know the job. They ask HR type questions. There is usually a specialist sits on the interview and gets a few questions in. In government organisations, you have to research the system and answer questions EXACTLY. That will get you through a sift by a non specialist
jayteeto is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2020, 09:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Bar to Bar
Posts: 795
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Channel Flyer
They’d be exceptionally bored with my social media history. I don’t have one. I don’t even use the facebook or the telegram. .
.....apart from pprune.....
Sloppy Link is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2020, 09:39
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Guernsey
Posts: 17
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jayteeto
HR people in most companies don’t know the job. They ask HR type questions. There is usually a specialist sits on the interview and gets a few questions in. In government organisations, you have to research the system and answer questions EXACTLY. That will get you through a sift by a non specialist

If someone were to actually get through to the interview stage, or in fact be asked questions. ???
Channel Flyer is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2020, 15:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts
I have 135, IR PBN and 135 TRI/TRE, few thousand plod hours in the past. Never crashed. They did not even respond to my application. Maybe I really am ****!
DOUBLE BOGEY is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2020, 15:13
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 509
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by DOUBLE BOGEY
I have 135, IR PBN and 135 TRI/TRE, few thousand plod hours in the past. Never crashed. They did not even respond to my application. Maybe I really am ****!
In that case, it's your reputation that proceeds you
helicrazi is online now  
Old 28th Apr 2020, 15:32
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by helicrazi
In that case, it's your reputation that proceeds you
Who knows but whatever the reason one might expect some kind of response. Seeing as my plod career was over 25 year ago and I literally know nobody in the current organisation it is odd.
DOUBLE BOGEY is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2020, 15:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Bar to Bar
Posts: 795
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DOUBLE BOGEY
Who knows but whatever the reason one might expect some kind of response. Seeing as my plod career was over 25 year ago and I literally know nobody in the current organisation it is odd.
Aviation, in any branch, has an elephantine memory...but at 57, are you worth the investment? Just sayin’ like.
Sloppy Link is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2020, 16:41
  #15 (permalink)  
hueyracer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by DOUBLE BOGEY
I have 135, IR PBN and 135 TRI/TRE, few thousand plod hours in the past. Never crashed. They did not even respond to my application. Maybe I really am ****!
I assumed you were happy with your current job?!
Or are you already looking at finding a "retirement job"?
 
Old 28th Apr 2020, 19:27
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts
Huey.....just speculating and yes always looking forward.
DOUBLE BOGEY is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2020, 19:27
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Out West
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Aviation, in any branch, has an elephantine memory...but at 57, are you worth the investment? Just sayin’ like.
If the man is already fully qualified what investment would there be?
Same again is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2020, 19:52
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,658
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Double Bogey would be an ideal candidate, ticks the necessary boxes in the advert. He could even be kept on as TRI/TRE once he hits 60? Wouldn’t that be sensible? Does NPAS do sensible? Apparently not if this thread and other comments on other threads are to be believed.
helimutt is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2020, 21:39
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Bar to Bar
Posts: 795
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Same again
If the man is already fully qualified what investment would there be?
25 year break will require induction, line training, uniform to name a few. Let’s be generous, he is an effective member of the workforce at his 58th birthday. In under two years time, the whole process will have to start all over again with the attendant costs on trainers time, administrators time, aircraft hours, more procurement when the original hasn’t had its five year expected life and so on. Type rating and experience from 25 years ago helps but doesn’t mean you can be recruited on Tuesday and be on shift at the weekend. We don’t know what was put on the application, location of applicant, distance to travel, prepared to move, where vacancies were he would accept and so on. Harsh but, business is business.
Sloppy Link is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2020, 05:30
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Sloppy Link
25 year break will require induction, line training, uniform to name a few. Let’s be generous, he is an effective member of the workforce at his 58th birthday. In under two years time, the whole process will have to start all over again with the attendant costs on trainers time, administrators time, aircraft hours, more procurement when the original hasn’t had its five year expected life and so on. Type rating and experience from 25 years ago helps but doesn’t mean you can be recruited on Tuesday and be on shift at the weekend. We don’t know what was put on the application, location of applicant, distance to travel, prepared to move, where vacancies were he would accept and so on. Harsh but, business is business.
All valid points but I really feel it costs nothing to respond to an application with an indication that it at least, was read and assimilated. Hey, I am probably old and have had a full, varied and interesting career flying helicopters. However, I feel really sad for the new guys, trying hard to get on when they are ignored by organisations who place adverts then can’t be bothered to show show respect for all their applicants. There are no excuses really for this.
DOUBLE BOGEY is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.