Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Scatsta IAC

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Scatsta IAC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jul 2020, 08:17
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Down Mexico Way
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bravo73
Ah. I wonder how the matrix will be written this time...
Bullseye, spot on!

Google this: 'Case Nos. 2401203/2016 McFarlane Cole' and see how they go about the matrix process.........

Last edited by WBOne; 9th Jul 2020 at 15:37.
WBOne is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 09:09
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: York
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by PPI Zulu
Which bit are you highlighting as particularly 'dopey'?
I am not actually referring to your post. More to the continual messaging being sent out by Babcock to its own staff, Pilots and Engineers. The statements and continual job threats have generally been inaccurate and poor.

"Could this then disadvantage the ex-BHL pilots in some way??" - No, it couldn't!! You would have to establish a fundamentally level playing field for equally qualified and experienced staff.

"How do you know what advice was given to Babcock management by their lawyers?" - I don't. But I did take the opportunity to read up on the law, and that seemed fairly clear, so it seemed likely that lawyers had also read the same pamphlet. Considering all the 'fact' being posted here on every subject from Covid to TUPE, I assumed that everyone was similarly qualified?


Anyway, I'm not trying to antagonise. But the general messaging seems designed to be negative and reduce morale across all working groups and the industry. Lets not keep adding fuel to these dying embers with clearly unsupported opinion that TUPE doesn't apply, and even if it does, one group or another will be disadvantaged.




SpindleBob is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2020, 10:11
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: amongst the clouds
Age: 53
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WBOne
Bullseye, spot on!

Google this: 'Case Nos. 2401203/2016 McFarlane Cole' and see how they go about the matrix process.........
The one where it is concluded
Looking at all of the matters put forward on behalf of the claimants in their counsel’s closing submissions I find that overall the process followed was a fair one and so the claims of the claimants are dismissed.
vee_why is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2020, 11:26
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Down Mexico Way
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, and also this
Originally Posted by Bravo73
Ah. I wonder how the matrix will be written this time...
to which should perhaps be added 'and when'.

I make no aspersions of course, its all speculation and rumor......I like the job I do.
WBOne is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.